Liberal logic

2hsnp9.jpg (click to show) Upvoted!

Boom baby.

>:)

Wasn't Fusion GPS (the company behind Christopher Steele), originally hired by Repubs during their primaries?

3 years ago when I found out the Steele report was misinformation from ex Russian spys, bought by the democratic party as an excuse to spy on the trump campaign, I was informed by the far left it was a 'conspiracy theory.' And the Steele report was 'REAL.'
Fast forward to 2019 and the everyone else found out that the whole thing was fake and paid for by Hillary's campaign (which if you're keeping score at home, is actual Russia collusion & attempted election fraud.) Hell, in the Trump impeachment trial, the Steele report was brought up and the Democrats BRAGGED about paying millions for the fake research, because in their minds that ment it was a legal business transaction & not election interference.
So don't bother. I'm 44,000 steps ahead of you.

"...paid for by Hillary's campaign (which....is actual Russia collusion & attempted election fraud)."

Hillary's campaign hired a law firm... who hired Fusion GPS (after Republicans did).....who hired Christopher Steele... who had Russian contacts... which he used to produce the dossier... which he also provided to the FBI... who had already begun investigating Russian interference months prior to that because of Papadopoulos. And as far as I know none of this was made public until months after the 2016 election.

Having the people accused of cheating recount their own ballots again under cover of the liberal media and magically finding no discrepancies isn't a recount or audit. It would have to done by federal personnel. State Democrats would of course not count since they are the ones the stuffed the ballots to begin with. Try to keep up.

Congratulations.. you did it! the only one here (maybe anywhere) to claim there were no discrepancies in the recount!

Keep up with what? Your horsesh*t?
Lol

4qw4qr.jpg (click to show) kind of like this

As long as it scares us into doing whatever we're told... good enough!

The "more votes than voters" is BS, but ignoring that, I enjoyed your meme.

Hey at least it's funny.
It's not BS actually, you just have to use a search engine other than than Google to look up the evidence. There are many proven incidents of double voting and 120% voter turn out. Liberals don't care if you send in 3 mail in votes and aren't a US citizen. They only get choked up over voter fraud if they think it hurts them...

No, in each county or state where it's claimed there are "more votes than voters", a simple search will confirm that the turnout was less than 100%.

Who am I gonna believe, the news reports I heard about rampant voter fraud or the news reports you heard on CNN (communist news network) about how all fraud is fake and they know it because www.faqcheck/chinagovt/democratnationalconvetion.cum/orangemanbad told them so?
The problem is, the same people telling you there's nothing to see here TODAY, lied to you yesterday about Hunter Biden, the Steele report, Russian collusion, etc. Fool me once, shame in you. Fool me 10,000 times, shame on me. 😬

He’s not wrong. Check the government stats yourself. Voter turnout was less than 100%.

You’re mixing up your references on voter turn out being 120%. I believe you’re referring to a statistician who calculated that at least 120% of voters voted for Biden and -30% for Trump. His data was based on incomplete information and he was going by voter registered with a certain political party. Obvious -30% of people can’t vote just as more than 100% can’t vote. But 20% of Republicans voters could’ve voted for Biden, not unheard of, and that would explain the error of 120%.

In other words, your information is false.

Check the 'Gov't stats?' Reread my original meme. Do you think I'm gonna ever believe the mainstream media again?

So, I guess you’re done debating then.

Bye!

Dude, I don't watch CNN. It's not that hard to check voter turnout.

Re read my comment. I just said: why the F would I believe your evidence over my evidence after 4 years of media lies. Read the original meme. Why the F would I believe the main stream media? Google search counts.

So you won't accept reality (such as voter turnout, which is NOT a matter of opinion)?

When 'Voter turnout' exceeds voter registration in a specific county and then magically after 2 weeks doesn't, there are no [legal] explanations. The version I heard was that the early tallies didn't include same-day registration. Of course this would still be illegal because you can't mail in vote with same day registration.
So yes, media, Google, news broadcasting numbers are totally up for interpretation because if everyone's 'facts' are different: what you believe is entirely up for debate based on the legitimacy of the sources.
The message of my original meme was: I've been lied to so many times by the media, why the hell would I believe these same people telling me to ignore voter fraud?
The argument: 'but you're wrong,' doesn't address the meme.
The argument: 'no voter fraud,' doesn't address the meme.
Address the meme: why the hell would I believe the media THIS TIME...

You imagined your opening sentence. Claiming that there are more votes than voters is to simply lie, and to excuse yourself from intelligent conversation.
You still can't provide any examples.

I just did: the news reported mail in voting numbers far in excess of voter registration numbers. The fact that it was fox news just means you didn't hear it. It doesn't mean it didn't happen. It being later 'proven false' is meaningless. The people who 'proved' it false were the same liberals in Michigan that were accused of cheating.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.freep.com/amp/3829654001

FAKE: North Muskegon had a 78.1% turnout, NOT 781.91%. There were 2648 votes, out of 3390 registered voters.
Your source is a liar.

Zeeland similarly had a voter turnout of 80.11%, NOT 460.51%.

You ask for evidence. You got it and you cry 'lies.' I started this conversation saying 'faqcheck.cum isn't on the table.' So we're at an impasse. Since you called me a liar without evidence, I'm done talking to ya. Don't comment on any of my other memes.

You presented lies, so you get called a liar.

*sigh* why is it sooo hard to get people to research the real facts for themselves...

don't forget biden's popularity with the dead.

To be fair, my dead grandparent's were huge FDR fans, so it's possible, if incredibly unlikely, that they did ACTUALLY vote Democrat in this election. Assuming you believe in zombies & zombie voter rights... 🧟‍♂️🧟‍♀️

LOL

Agreed. However dead people don’t vote.

Errors in the voting system occur all the time and two people often have the same first and family name. Especially relatives.

Proven that dead voters ain't a thing.

I mean, there are a few, but if twenty dead people swing a national election then that would be a seriously close-cut affair.

It would need to be over 10-80,000 dead people to swing any of the states Trump needed.

It is very unlikely.

Agreed.

If they admit to 20, that means there's 20,000. They went into the election claiming there was no evidence of [democrat] voter fraud, ever, in the history of the universe. They went outta the election claiming it was only a few thousand votes here and there and couldn't possibly sway an election. Wake up and smell the bullpoopy.

Only in your mind.

If we had 10% of the provable irregularities going the other way the far left would be demanding audits and recounts. So again, the far left is only concerned with fraud if they think it hurts them.

I don't care what the far left thinks. You've gotten your audits and recounts and your day in court. It's been proven repeatedly that you've got nothing.

Nope. The courts ignored the challenges and wouldn't hear them. Refusing to listen to evidence isn't a day in court. There were no recounts or audits. The states just certified the votes without addressing anything. Try to keep up.

Trump may have called the recounts a "scam" but at least he acknowledged their existence.

Liar. Not a matter of opinion - this is absolute fact of reality. You really have no place in intelligent discussion.

So stop lying that the left blocks checking the votes.

Ikr