When Hypocrites Place Party Above Country

Good question.

What "current and massive" evidence?

Blind Justice Not Blind Partisanship

So, we just pretend Trump's lawsuits weren't thrown out for lack of evidence?

It is good that they were thrown out as this will fast-track them to the Supreme Court, John.

Man, you're delusional! I'd hate to be you on January 20th.

The evidence of which you speak was ultimately ignored, too, correct? Last time I checked, Brett Kavanaugh was confirmed to the Supreme Court.

C’mon, man! :::laughs in Bidenese:::

It was not ignored...it was investigated and proven to be unsubstantiated. In other words, Blasey Ford lied her head off! It along with the Russia investigation were nothing short of ridiculous circuses.

35 of 50 lawsuits thrown out of court or dropped. Only fifteen more BS lawsuits to go!

https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-donald-trump-lawsuits-elections-e1297d874f45d2b14bc99c403abd0457

Hypocrisy defines the Demorats and their party leaders.

Oh sure some are, but it defines Democrats who claim they weren’t aware of the chop zone, there were no riots in Portland and Antifa is an idea.

To me it does. You support the blatant lies then you are complicit.

during an Antifa incited riot

repubs maybe but actual conservatives? No.

I know a lot of people who only claim to be conservative then.

thats what it looks like, from what I've read.

what?

Without looking at what they are actually saying, judging by the number of comments you have on here, I'd say you've attracted some pretty rabid leftists.

And you would be right, Captain. They gravitate to my memes so they can tell me how wrong I am which just makes me more determined to post the next meme. Oh, I totally laughed out loud (quite loud actually) at your "Wonder if plagiarizing Joe can figure out who to vote for on his own" meme! You are very funny and definitely a conservative! I added myself as a follower so you are now up to 196....

That'll make me 31 for you!

I have a bit of a trek to catch up with you, Captain, but thanks!

lol, no problem!

Same here when it happens. I also think all the comments help it get front page ;)

Thanks! I was very proud of that one XD

You might be unaware but there is an attempt to overthrow the election. And it’s not Democrats that are doing it. When you openly state the election is rigged, do nothing, and then claim the courts will decide this election; before the election? That isn’t going to fly no matter how much you think the ends justify the means of putting Trump there. All reliable sources have concluded this election was legitimate. Only those with a political agenda are saying otherwise.

If you referring to mainstream media declaring the winner, then that's not a "reliable" source, according to the dictionary meaning of 'reliable'. But even mainstream media isn't saying the election was legitimate, they're just declaring "Biden won". There's 1000s of testimonies of poll watchers, with evidence and video of election law violations, which by definition make the election illegitimate.

Talking about the various state and federal departments for overseeing election fraud. No widespread fraud has been found to overturn the election. As for MSM, where exactly are we suppose to get our sources? Only media with a very strong conservative bias? No media at all? Seems counterproductive to me.

All good points. Voter fraud is fraud. It doesn't have to be "widespread" to be against the law. Admittedly, the Republican side is claiming voter fraud, but I find it curious, why the Democrat side keeps using the phrase "widespread fraud", when the Republican side isn't using that term. The whole Presidential election is not a "widespread" election, it is all at the state level, which is then broken down to the county level. I think the Democrat side is, perhaps unintentionally, fueling the fire, of voter fraud claims by ignoring them or deceitfully handling them, (like PA judges judging universal mail-in ballots OK, when it is in direct violation of PA state constitution that specifically prohibits universal mail-in ballots). I think most Republicans would accept Biden winning, if they could be reassured the ballots didn't have fraud or at least not enough fraudulent votes that could overturn the outcome in the particular key states. There shouldn't be voter fraud at all at any level, not just if it affects the outcome.

I am not a Democrat and I use the term. Our political biases do not prevent the use of terms commonly used. If anything, I believe it’s far spread use succinctly differentiates the term “no fraud” which is infactual. Fraud has been found. And “widespread fraud” shortening that fraud occurring on a national scale that successfully affect the outcome. Given how often people must repeat themselves on social media, or this site, it is likely we’ll shorten our terms to get our point across. The overuse of these terms do not rise red flags, but I imagine they are triggering to people who don’t want to believe it.

It is my understanding that universal mail-in ballots were lawfully accepted and the charges of it being unconstitutional came weeks after the law went into affect. Making the claims it was unconstitutional weeks before the election highly suspect. It would be just as unconstitutional to have denied an entire type of vote to those who had already chose to do so. They would not be able to vote again, and thus it would deny their constitutional right to vote. Essentially this is a loss. The best they could do is rule the law unconstitutional for future elections but it was too late to challenge it for this one. To do otherwise is highly suspect.

Fraud is always going to occur, and it is usually caught. Humans are sinful creatures, are they not? Saying fraud should never occur is like saying crime should never occur. Fraud is crime, ergo, crime will always occur. Catching fraud is another matter. Being slack on voting rules can lead to fraud but it isn’t fraud if it is handled within the legal parameters. Can laws be wrong? Absolutely. But expecting to use this as an excuse to reverse an election when there were weeks or months to do this before is either the type of gross incompetence one might expect from government or a very dirty trick to undermine our election by pretending to be constitutional white knights. Either way, it’s not going to work.

Specifically in PA, their state legislature introduced a new proposed law for universal mail-in ballots on this year's ballot, which was mailed out unsolicited (aka universally mailed ballots), subsequent suits were filed against this about the election ballot, which a PA judge ruled that it was allowable, when in the PA state constitution (not all states) mail-in ballots must be requested with an acceptable reason from the allowable reasons, like military service, too sick to vote in person, etc. In PA, 100s of thousands of mail-in ballots were submitted unsolicited, which by PA's own law makes them illegitimate and cannot be counted. This creates a giant legal mess for PA, because they already had many other problems with their election laws which invites fraud and this just added a huge pile on top of that.
Given fraud can always occur, but simple procedures can prevent or at least minimize opportunities for fraud. These problems have been around, but since this election is such a high importance, they really get magnified.

You are mistaken.

The law was changed on October 29th of last year. It was constitutionally challenged on November 21st of this year. Why wait a year and a month to challenge it? Why wait AFTER the election to challenge it? Universal mail-in ballots were legally viable as the public understood and thus ruling that way of voting unconstitutional after the fact is in and of itself unconstitutional as it would deny everyone who did so the right to vote.

Again, the best they can do is change the law for future elections but without any effect on the 2020 election.

It was challenged when it first was introduced, but ruled against because it was before the election and no fraudulent ballot had occurred yet. The same law was challenged after the election and is still ruled against, because it was after the occurrence. In PA, they have the legal predicament like a "catch 22" situation, where they gave opposite judgement opinions for the same violation, where 2 different cases before and after were both ruled against.

That's not catch 22 because they ruled the same way with two different cases, that's called consistency. I'm unfamiliar with any challenge before Mike Flynn, and it's been like pulling teeth getting those challenges and on what grounds they were on or what the ruling was.

It IS catch 22, if they rule the votes unconstitutional AFTER the election, robbing the legitimate votes of the people because of the alleged (and still unproven) illegitimate votes.

Do you have some reference to the original challenge of the Act 77 law? I'd love to read more about this. Anything more I would have to say would just be repeating above.

It doesn't suite their agenda.

Evidence = ZERO.

Are you a bot? That is all you say even when it has nothing to do with the meme. You can't answer the question posed...

I believe Blasey-Ford because of her character and because of the nefarious nature of Kavanaugh's past. First person accounts of what he was like when younger are very accurate. Plus the way he talked to the Senators was a disgrace. He is a rapist.
And this election was the most safe and secure election in history. Biden received 81 Million legal votes and DESTROYED tRUMPf. And tRUMPf is lying about fraud because he has not been able to prove it. ZERO EVIDENCE. Oh sure, the right-wing media keeps coming up with stuff, but it never materializes. The courts and judges never get to see this evidence. tRUMPf says "MASSIVE FRAUD." Well if it was massive, you'd think that we'd see a little. Well 33 days later we've seen nothing.
tRUMPf has ulterior motives for claiming fraud but there are his brain dead foot soldiers peddling his unfounded lies. He is a traitor and deserves a traitor's fate. And so do you.
You are a fake news peddler. ALL FAKE NEWS ALL THE TIME. You have LITERALLY never posted one meme of truth. Its all lies created with the intent of creating a divide.

Then why are leftists saying that there is no proof? Dems have violated the law in their attempt to steal this election . Trump had this in the bag ... just compare his rallies to Biden's handful of folks showing up. No way would Mr Excitement (Biden) garner these numbers without cheating.

There is a difference between “widespread voter fraud” and “fraud”. I’m willing to concede with an election this big, and with enough people who were already in doubt of the validity of the election system, that fraud probably did occur. However, when it is said that there is “no proof of widespread voter fraud” then it is meant that there wasn’t a coordinated effort to overturn the election. Nor is there enough proof to overturn the election in Trump’s favor. We’re not talking about millions of votes, or even tens of thousands. We’re taking dozens of dozens may have been wrongfully cast.

Then again, there may be proof that there was widespread voter fraud but it hasn’t been found. If the proof does exist, then produce it in court. If it is valid, then more may join in the outrage. However, if you think there will be a deeper investigation or a hold in any way on the certification and submission of the results, then you are mistaken. There isn’t even enough proof to open an investigation of that magnitude. That’s how hundreds of suspect affidavits of people making claims that are easily explained if not made up, likely all Trump Supporters conveniently, don’t amount to anything. And flooding the courts with all these minor grievances doesn't buy time. It wastes it. The US justice department has looked into this and has already concluded there isn’t widespread voter fraud. It seems to me, that you’re only willing to believe the government if it helps Trump. That

All this is just an attempt to seed further doubt into the common voter to not trust election results. Trump said it himself back in 2016 and all throughout this election before the day of. “It’s rigged.” If that were true, then he basically did nothing to stop it and counted on the courts to save his ass. That isn’t going to happen, either. And I’ve seen plenty of posts now of these conspiracy theorists, or trolls echoing them, that because this election is such a fraud that Republicans need not participate at all. That is where this conjured mentality goes logically to those who mindlessly follow baseless claims and ludicrous sources.

You are conveniently forgetting about DOMINION. Look at the numbers. Numbers don't lie.

Mathematician Shows That in Arizona the Dominion Machines Counted Biden Votes as 1.3 Votes and Trump Votes as 0.7 Votes
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2020/12/01/mathematician-shows-that-in-arizona-the-dominion-machines-counted-biden-votes-as-1-3-votes-and-trump-votes-as-0-7-votes/

Video... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwHa1pfyJjc

Dr. Shiva’s conclusions are still questionable. He even admits that he doesn’t have access to the full data and is running his estimations by the registered voters by precinct. All he’s proven is that at least 30% of registered Republicans voted for Biden or did not vote at all and less than 30% of unregistered independent voters voted for Trump. That accounts for the error of his curve. Again, he admits that.

Dr. Strange, you are not an uneducated man and I respect the fact that you said that fraud probably did occur. That is more than I have heard from ANY other left-leaning Democrat or liberal on imgflip. So, kudos on that accomplishment.

Mark Levin did a fantastic job tonight of explaining the unconstitutionality of PA legislative and judicial actions since 2019. His logical analysis should be heard by every concerned citizen and every Supreme Court Justice in America. This SHOULD flip PA to Trump...it is that good. Please watch and let me know if you agree with this brilliant lawyer and author. We have to unite on the principles of common sense, the Constitution, and honest/fair elections or our Republic is doomed.

Levin: The Supreme Court needs to intercede in 2020 election fraud investigations

https://www.foxnews.com/shows/life-liberty-levin

I was hoping for a transcript so I had to wait for a time to listen to 15 minutes. I could’ve read dozens of pages of information instead.

But from what I can tell, Mark Levin is calling Democrat legislation that occurred months ago if not little over than a year, which was constitutionally done, unconstitutional. That is false. State legislators and judiciaries did not violate any law of the constitution as states retain the right to decide federal election procedures to keep the federal government in check.

Because there is no proof. And tRUMPf didn't have it in the bag. He lost. He lost BIG TIME. Deal with it you f**king fake news peddler.

"Trump had this in the bag ... just compare his rallies to Biden's handful of folks showing up." well I mean there is a pandemic and most trump supporters don't really believe in the pandemic.....

We are talking about a pandemic where over 99% of people recover! Some don't even know they had it but test positive for antibodies later. Trump vs Biden is a no-brainer...Trump on top and I genuinely feel a bit sorry for Biden. Americans don't want a Socialist country with a POTUS who clearly has dementia.

but we have 200k deaths...

You can slip in the bathtub and die and you are still dead. If you had the virus you are counted as a covid death. The media has you guys in a whirlwind....you don't know what to believe. There are only 17,000 people who have died FROM the virus and the rest died WITH the virus. HUGE difference.

Really? then why weren't hospitals filled with people. why are there people literally dying in the hospital every day? 17,000? this must be a joke, right? where are you getting this information?

Less than 99%, actually. And it should be mentioned that Democrats had many Socialists to choose from and chose the most moderate candidate put forward. Biden.

They nominated a candidate on his deathbed with ties to China and put the most liberal US senator on the ticket in place to succeed him. Kamela's father is a Marxist economics professor. Sounds real 'moderate' to this conservative...

I was specifically referring to Biden as a moderate. And the people, both at the primaries and general election, chose him.

I’m older than Biden. So forgive me if I do not see him on his deathbed. I’m sure I’ll outlive him, tho’.

It would be accurate to call Kamala the most partisan rather than liberal. I haven’t taken a look at all the things she approved but I’ve given to understand she frequently voted for Democratic legislation and against Republican legislation more than her peers. Partisan politics is hardly anything new to Republicans.