See the difference?

It did. Please look it up.

I have. Substantially. i have spent about 500 hours researching and investigating. Its the main reason I will never vote for anyone with an (R) next to their name ever again even though I voted GoP in 6 of the last 7 Presidential elections. Even tRUMPf's own Dept of Labor and Statistics reported less than 5% ever trickled down.
It was the greatest scam in US history and the individual stories about the abuse and stock buybacks is nauseating. Worst of all, they pulled the wool right over the eyes of all the Republican supporters who were either trying to save face, or literally too stupid to understand. Even Paul Ryan and Lyndsay Graham said it themselves (probably without knowing they were being quoted.)
So you need to look it up yourself.

Sources please.
https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/trump-tax-cuts-and-the-middle-class-here-are-the-facts

500 hours? No job huh 🤔

I can tell you from personal experience that this middle class person benefited from Trump's tax cuts. My net pay went up, and two years in a row, my company paid bonuses to us little people, aka the employees. They had *never* done that before.

Try checking with the people affected before you make your high and mighty claims to actually know what's going on.

“ Its the main reason I will never vote for anyone with an (R) next to their name ever again even though I voted GoP in 6 of the last 7 Presidential elections.”

Any other obvious lies you’d care to tell us?

Like you're even 500 hours old!

Higher risk for numerous illnesses, can't reproduce, sends you to Hell if not repented of.

What about bi people

The lying left, who has countless times fabricated elaborate falsehoods in failed attempts to impeach our President, is accusing conservatives of, "making things up?" That is just rich.

nope not debunked audio proof.

I'm going to trust Trump to know how to handle negotiations with terrorists, better than you.

You are saying you know better, right?

He also never called our generals that. Its been debunked 9 times over with actual witnesses.

Don’t upset him with truth. He’s like a sleepwalker who is startled he might flip out.

Never been debunked. Thats your Fox news propaganda. And "9 times"??? where did you get that number.
So I will trust the 5-star Marine General with 35+ years of service with combat who also served as JCoS.
But you go ahead and trust the failed reality TV star with an exhaustive trail of lying and a lifetime of shady business dealings.
You are pathetic Jason.

So, where's your proof?

I hate to break it to you, but until something is proven, it doesn't have to be debunked.

Try having it "bunked" first.

I heard that The Atlantic editor, Jeffrey Goldberg, has admitted his sources for that bat shit crazy story just might be a bit less than reliable. So I did a search and depending on which search engine you use, you won't find much about that. Hint: don't use Google.

Don't use Google? Why? Because YOU say to not use Google? Oh wait...I am sure you have a search engine that is more favorable to your agenda. That must be the one you want me to use.

Basically is boils down to this:
I know about General Mattis' history, his work history, his service record, the things he has said, and the positions he has taken throughout his career. In essence, we know what type of man he is.
Then there is tRUMPf. We all know his history of lying, cheating, bullying, and sexual misconduct. The media has been making fun of him for those things for nearly 40 years. You have to be really stupid to not have known this. He has been a laughing stock for decades.
When comparing the two men, I believe Mattis. As far as I am concerned it is 100% accurate and tRUMPf and his team are 100% lying losers attempting damage control...in other words, tRUMPf's standard procedure.

Its so true and so obvious that your response and upcoming responses are obviously for trying to save face.
How embarrassing for you.

But he said it was debunked "9 times". So what are those 9?

Gawd, you are dense, aren't you?

I suggested not using Google, because it would help your overall enlightenment to not use a search engine that is the tool of leftist media and tech, both of which hate Trump.

As far as the "9 ti mes" that you've got such a raging hard-on for, that wasn't me who posted it, so shut your filthy pie hole about that when you're addressing me.

I only wish that snowflakes like you were consistent in how you apply your standards for "proof", because when it's in your favor, you'll take hearsay. When it's not, then it's just hearsay.

I guess systematic hypocrisy is a way of life for brain melted snowflakes like you, isn't it?

Your explanation for why you suggested a search engine other than Google is for the exact reason I accused you of telling me not to use Google. DUH!!! You want me to get a "rightist" search result. And calling Google a leftist search engine is probably the stupidest thing I have ever heard and proves you are nothing more than a regurgitator of tRUMPf and Fox propaganda.

I know you are not the one who said "9 times". I was explaining what my complaint was because you decided to chime in. Is that ok your exhaulted highness?

And as far as proof goes, don't make it sound like the righties are any different. 99% of everything you all say are exaggerations or completely made up. And when you get called on it you argue...even when there is video, audio, or photographic proof. Its all about saving face. Its hypocritical. In other words.....tRUMPfism.

Deny it all you want. tRUMPtards already do. True Americans know the truth. The day of reckoning is at hand.

“Is that ok your exhaulted highness?“

This is not how a grown man speaks.

He said "shut your filthy pie hole about that when you're addressing me"

Oh I forgot....tRUMPies don't read everything and comment based on emotion.

So, you admit that google is a stooge of the left and big tech. Thanks!

Maybe you're not quite as dim as you seem...

Okay, genius, back up your 99% claim, since you're obviously so concerned with proof and integrity.

And btw, it would not be wise of you to lump me in with anyone, which you've clearly done. Normally I don't offer libtards any advice, because they're too ignorant and stupid to take it, but heck, you've shown some promise by recognizing Google for what it is.. .so what the heck, I'll take a chance on you.

The day of reckoning? Good one! False consensus effect much?

I admitted it? Are you establishing other people's intentions again?
You must have an enormous ego if you think that people conform to your way of thinking.
And I'll lump you in anywhere with anyone, at anytime that I choose. Sound good to you Lumpy????

So you are a lumpy tRUMPtard who believes in the integrity of a lifetime liar, self-centered, racist sexual predator, and also believes that in the past 4 years, thousands of news sources, media sources, and even search engines are all lefty and therefore fake. You am smart. You am douche.

So, on Nov 3rd. If tRUMPf wins, he will chastise and bully the liberals/Democrats and they will push back. There will be a civil war as I guarantee you, the 55% who hate tRUMPf will NOT allow him to be President again. And if he loses, he will claim a rigged election, try to use his power as President to circumvent the Constitution and nullify the election, and also call his base to radical arms and there will be bloodshed as Liberals and Americans take to the streets to defend their nation against an invading MAGA force armed to the teeth with assault rifles and fake military-wannabe uniforms.
My family are preparing for November 4th. The day America ends.

But yeah...none of it is tRUMPf's fault. I get it.

“So you are a lumpy tRUMPtard...”.

This is not how a grown man speaks.

No, I'm making a statement of what I believe is accurate about what you said.

Sweet blessed Elvis, I feel like I'm walking a grade school child though how to learn critical thinking. Oh well, here goes.

- I posted, "I heard that The Atlantic editor, Jeffrey Goldberg, has admitted his sources for that bat shit crazy story just might be a bit less than reliable.So I did a search and depending on which search engine you use, you won't find much about that.Hint: don't use Google."

Before I get to your reply, are you so utterly incapable of rationality when it comes to Trump that you cant comprehend what I'm saying there? Because what I said is that I've done searches on Google and other search engines, and (hold the presses) Google has nothing about this possibility, which is a very real possibility. The point being that non-Google search engines return a broader range of information. Whoa, if you cannot understand that, I should just call you a melted snowflake and end this right now. But I won't, because unlike many who think like you, I actually believe in free inquiry, and open discourse. I don't believe in the AntiFA / BLM brown shirt tactic of beating my opponents when they disagree with me. I believe you have a right to believe what you believe, no matter how wrong you may be, imo.

Anyway...

- You: "Don't use Google? Why? Because YOU say to not use Google?"

- Me: "I suggested not using Google, because it would help your overall enlightenment to not use a search engine that is the tool of leftist media and tech, both of which hate Trump."

- You: "Your explanation for why you suggested a search engine other than Google is for the exact reason I accused you of telling me not to use Google. DUH!!!"

- Me: "So, you admit that google is a stooge of the left and big tech.Thanks!"

btw; You don't have to accuse me of telling you not to use Google. I told you not to use Google.

Grammar issues aside, what you said is entirely circular, meaning you came back to my original point. Here's how I would re-write what you wrote: Your reason for suggesting a search engine other than Google is the exact reason you said not to use Google. DUH!!!"

How else could that be interpreted? Maybe you just don't write clearly?

Note that I replaced:

"why you suggested" with "for suggesting"

"for the" with "the"

and "I accused you of telling me" with "you said"

In other words, I simply cleaned up your poor grammar, so it's understandable. No need to thank me.