That's the outcome for "bad luck Brianna"?

Story time I guess so when I was little I would play games with my friends at church and if I didn’t win you cheated and I would get very mad one time I got so mad that I started beating on my chest like a flipin gorilla

Moral of the story I was a sore loser

[Donkey Kong theme intensifies]

LOL!

Bad Luck Brianna

Let me settle the wage gap controversy with a question of my own. If men make more money than women who do the same job, putting in the same amount of effort for the same amount of time, then why bother hiring men in the first place?

Exactly. And what tells me this game, probably designed by feminist women, failed to garner decent sales? Altho I wouldn't put it past simping cucks trying to score with their frigid wives either.

But you're right. Any good boss would only hire women and save a bundle.

I wouldn’t call that boss good. Hiring only women, but still paying them less than what they would pay a man is a completely screwed up economy.

The point being is there is no gender wage gap. Women tend not to work as long hours, take more time of to deal with family, not be as forceful as men in asking for wage increases and other factors. The wage gap is a feminist myth.

I do see your point, but you have to agree that the economy would become pretty bad if not only men didn't work, but women still got underpaid.

The entire world would collapse in 4 days!!!!!

What you get paid all depends on how much effort you put in. If you put in minimum effort you get paid minimum wage, if you put in a lot of effort you get paid a lot, see how this goes everyone.

Though sometimes women don’t get paid what they should because their boss is sexist

If you ever see that happen, call the police, because it's f**king illegal, has been since 1963.

Okay

True, but I am just saying in general

I saw this documentary that does all the mathematical equations and said that women actually get paid the same but prefer to work home or not work to take care of children so the earning average is different

Yeah

unless your a high ranking manager then the hard works over

But then you have to put in more work to show that you’re worth something

Like senators

Hey if it gets them paid who cares

No. Women are very capable of working hard and being just like men. The wage gap is that women get paid less PER HOUR than men. Men can deal with family too, believe it or not. Women should not ever be paid less than men.

Yes, because reasons. If they don't put in the effort, damn right they should be paid less.

But, they do. :)

Then they will be paid appropriately.

:D

So they do that in nursing?

And since you all love your links so much:
https://www.wgu.edu/blog/improving-gender-wage-gap-medicine1809.html

There are many theories behind it, none of them either proven or debunked. One of them being men being taken seriously more, so they'd rather have a man than a woman, so let's pay more to men to lure them in... Sexist reason, yet (unfortunately) plausible.

Another theory seems to be that men are better bluffers than women, and that women are too honest at times. Not sure, but a possibility.

And another one is also that men are the longer they work somewhere more willing to negotiate with the boss about a pay raise than women, and men therefore also willing to brag more to the boss to the importance they've been to the company. This one can be combined with the buff theory...

There are a lot more theories, I've heard about this matter. Some theories really blaming the women themselves for not standing up for themselves like males do, and others blaming the employers for sexism. In the end it's likely a combination of factors. Please note, it's only something of the last few decades that women are getting more equal to men than inferior to men. My own bother quit working because I was born, like women were expected to do back then. And I'm not even that old, and my mother is even still alive. It would not be realistic to think that all the traces of the old situation would be gone by now.

Of course, favoring women over men, is as much sexist as the other way around. Although the difference between man and woman being more than just men having something between their legs women have not (scientific fact), I've never understood why that should be reason to see them as inferiors. But for the past thousand of years this was the public view. My own grandmother, a woman herself, for crying out loud, was heavily against the emancipation of women. She really held tight to the old man works for money and woman does the cleaning, cooking and taking care of kids, role pattern.

I don't think this game will make much of a difference (it's because we're in August now, but I'd almost take it for an April fools, joke), but time is needed, and we all need to accept the idea of woman and man being 100% equal.. Still different, but still equal... Much has been achieved already, but we're simply not there yet.

I write lots of essays based on anything.

I agree I’m a female and I hate how people still treat males as a higher status. It’s 2020 shouldn’t equality for everyone be a thing by now. I used to live in Mexico when I was five and the school I went to was very sexist. I two best friends were both boys. The playground was split into two parts. One had a small road to ride tricycles and scooters on and the other half was the actual playground. We usually hung out were the tricycles were. One day the teacher separated the genders and said the boys had to be were the tricycles and scooters are which is were I hung out and the girls had to go to the playground. I was separated from my only friend for no reason. I tried to ask to go over were the boys were but she said no. Having very low self esteem which I still have I didn’t stand up for myself and went to were the girls are. I absolutely hate sexist and believe boys and girls should be treated the same. We may be different genders but we are all still humans and deserve to be payed the same and treated the same. I hope overtime it gets better and hopefully males and females will all be treated the same but i also hate how now there making girls get more points in this game is just wrong. The should get the same amount of points none should get the advantage.

Like I said... Women have been treated as inferiors for centuries, if not millennia, and the emancipation is a pretty new thing, only a few decades old. We can't expect full equality in such a short term, compared to the long term that came before that... That would have been beyond a miracle....

I am a male myself, and I've never understood why females would be inferior to me just because of their gender. Yes, I like to see beautiful women, and I feel sexually attracted to them, and I love having sex with them, etc. etc. etc. I'm a healthy heterosexual man, so that all comes with the territory. But I never forget that despite all that females are in the first place human beings, with feelings, and dignity... and most of all rights.... Of course, I guess it should go without saying that women feeling sexually attracted to me, should also see me as a human being with feelings and dignity, and rights...

Thank you for being so open about your own personal experiences regarding this topic...
It has been quite illuminating... At least for me. ;)

Yes, but if you bring this up to someone who believes in this vengeance-for-equality nonsense, they will not acknowledge your point. They will immediately go to their emotions and will give the same sap story about an unfair playing field...it's pathetic.

Trump 2020...please dear God let him avert the destruction of this country from within one more time!

booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

The answer is: the wage gap is mostly a lie. The reason why man men make more money is that they are more likely to do longer hours, and take on more risky jobs.

It’s really not a lie. Don’t put females down like that plenty are doing doing the same amount of hours as males and plenty are standing up for there rights. Males are getting payed better even if there doing the same amount of hours. It’s dumb and should be solved by now

I didn't put females down, I am stating a fact.

All numbers investigators base themselves on are always based on how much money you get for one hour of work. That alone voids the entire relevance whether or not males make more hours than females or not, but regardless of that, people keep bringing it up.... Convenient, eh?

Unfortunately, it's not... Investigators have been sorting this out. The numbers are based on the the hour salary, and not the total salary... Indeed since a lot of females work part-time (more than males according to the numbers the same investigators came up with) may make you easily think that, but salary is in most countries where they put this in number based on how much money you earn an hour. Of course, there are women around who get more for the same work, everything is to be taken in average, but overall, and since this is just a simple math one of the few things where the numbers give the proper image, women earn less money an hour, in most western countries (I'm not yet even talking about countries where women are not even allowed to work, just the ones where woman are officially equal to the law). Some countries do better than others. Denying a problem is not the same as solving it... Unfortunately.

Well, there must be more investigation of these things before we know that the wage back is as bad as liberals say it is.

Actually a TRUE liberal wouldn't care, as TRUE liberalism is rather about the right of the strongest, than about equal rights. Liberalism is NOT a leftist philosophy, despite popular belief. However liberalism is not about exaggerating things either.

The numbers are not even new. They've been investigated for decades. Things are slowly getting better, but yet overall women make less money for one hour of work than males do (for the same kind of work). Of course, judging on numbers alone is never adequate. Finding out the reason why this is, is more prudent. And then the situation gets more complex.

Now if I'd speak from true liberal perspective, I'd say women should improve their skills in negotiating with their boss. Investigations do show a part of the issue is indeed in there. When I speak as obsessive SJW-wannabe, I'd say loads of employers are just sexist. And the investigations also show truth in this. So most likely it's a combination of these factors, and very likely some more... And thus the solution will lie in addressing these factors accordingly.

Whatever the truth is, one fact remains. In average speaking, female workers DO get less for the same work per hour. No matter how much this is being investigated and calculated, that outcome is always clear. Like I said, the difference differs per country. But even the countries doing best, have males earning more... The difference is only smaller, but still more.

You really think that these people around the world who support abortion and other evil things are "true" liberals? That doesn't make sense. What you say a "true liberal" does not fit the description of modern-day liberalism.

Liberalism has nothing to do with the abortion topic, as that is a progressive topic. And modern-day liberalism has nothing to do with the context you put to it. Not as single soul in the U.S. I spoke so far did, by the way, not even those who call themselves liberals. Liberalism is one of the most far right directions in politics. You know what it stands for? Leaving everything to the market, everybody should take responsibility for themselves, and the authorities should interfere as little as possible. That is core essence of liberalism. "Being free"... of course abortion can fit in liberalism as it gives women freedom to decide what happens inside their own womb, but in reality it's rather a progressive statement... To tell a joke, in my own country there are two right wing parties, pretty much based on liberalism. One of them not against abortion and the other condemning the existence of it with passion, also using the Bible as their reasoning. Liberalism is purely an economical philosophy, just like socialism, which directly opposes nearly everything liberalism stands for. Abortion is a medical ethic issue, and does therefore fit in neither Liberalism (right) nor communism (left)... Actually Liberalism in its purest form is the extreme of right as well as communism in its purest form is the extreme of left. There's a lot in between. And conservatism is by the way neither left nor right. My country even has a leftist conservative party. Can you imagine it. They oppose abortion an euthanasia, but on the economic views they have a moderate leftist view in which sharing fairly and equally is a bit of the core... the essence of leftist politics...

My description of true liberalism does fit the official description. But I guess that in a country with only two parties... Right-progressive and right-conservative... your views are a bit narrowed. Liberalism is only one of the MANY political philosophies out there...

But fact remains, by bringing up abortion, you disqualified yourself from showing to know what liberalism is. Abortion is not economic after all...

Again, this idea of liberalism that you speak of is not what is in America. Liberalism in America is partly begging of left-wing and tad bits of right-wing (but mostly left). I don't know where you live, but it sure sounds like liberals are much better humans in general.

Wrong. In America it's the same thing, it's just that most Americans use the term in an incorrect way. Brings us also to the topic that the Democrat party is not even a leftist party... They are a more progressive party, where the Republicans are more conservative, but neither progression nor conservatism have anything to do with liberalism... Liberalism has room for both... This because, I said it before, liberalism is merely an economic philosophy, and neither conservatism nor progressive are economical.
And actually where I live the liberals are the most extreme right-wing party on the country... Well that's liberalism is rightist everywhere around the globe (yes, including the U.S. the fact the term is used incorrectly there does not change the philosophy and what it stands for itself). Real leftist politics doesn't exist in the U.S. If you wonder why your boss can fire you just because he doesn't like your face, it's because of the lack of leftist politics, as well as health care not being regulated at all an being run as a commercial business. Now the U.S. has tried a few leftist ideas, but only very moderate. ObamaCare was a good example of that, but it doesn't come anywhere near the true leftist version of healthcare... Please note, this is only about how healthcare in financed... Not about what doctors may ethically do and not do. When it comes to euthanasia and abortion, I know two conservative parties who are both against that, but when it comes to health care finances, one of the them being moderate left wants to get it properly taken care of in a public system, and the other is for the more liberal approach, thus leaving it more to the people's own responsibilities. Both parties are conservative, yet one left and one right... See the difference here? And aside from left and right, and progressive and conservative, there's also green politics, which is neither left nor right nor progressive nor conservative, but merely based on keeping the environment in order and to protect nature. Now most green parties in the world are overall also leftist, but that does not necessarily have to be so. Green politics can be combined with rightist politics by basing a good commercial model on nature protection, meaning you protect nature, clean the environment and get rich in the process.

That's the problem in the U.S. eh... Black-white thinking in politics. One two parties. Only two choices, eh?

Supplement: Point is still though, the political spectrum is, and has always been, and will always be more complex than that. Since I grew up in Europe where most countries have more political parties, and most of them having a combination of multiple political philosophies, the differences are often much clearer... that is to a person who really dug in the deep of politics, as people who think black-white in left and right, putting both words in the wrong context are also legio here. So it's not strictly a problem exclusive to the U.S.A. But due to the 2 party system (a side effect of the electoral college if you ask me), and the way the supporters of both parties try to make a profile with propaganda against the other (the Democrats and the Republicans are EQUALLY GUILTY in that crap), it gets harder and harder to tell how politics really works.. or rather how it SHOULD work...

No. The democratic party is very far left. Stop trying to argue for something you don't live in.

Hah! You've never seen a a "very far left" party... Perhaps you shouldn't argue about things you don't know anything about, and politics in general is clearly beyond your scope of knowledge. The fact that you say the Democrat party is far left shows how much you know.....

The Democrat party is a right-progressive party. What only goes for progressive politics is that progressive thinking is something thinking outside the box and sometimes accept that some ideas, either left when you are right or viice versa, are sometimes required to make progression. But overall, the Democrat party is on the far right side of the political spectrum. They only dare to sniff a few leftist things, but that doesn't make them left. I'm a moderate left voter myself, and trust me, the parties I vote for are by far more on the left than the Democrat party as ever been, and then those parties are even moderate... You haven't heard what the true far left parties have for their agenda.... And if you deem the Democrat party far leftist... I don't think I should tell you, as I don't think you have the stomach to take it. And then to think they even those parties have not yet gone as far as Marx and Engels. You know nothing, Jon Snow... Don't pretend you do... You live in a country with two right parties... One so conservative they'd never let their ideas go, and the other still right, but willing to accept left options if they think there are no good alternatives on the right. How can such a situation give you a proper view, when the political spectrum is really beyond any form of complexity? You only deem the democrats far left, as they are the closest to left the U.S. has ever been... Or at least in recent years. But they still have a long way to go to be a true leftist party. There is a reason why they didn't want Saunders for president.... He was too left for them... And then to think that Saunders wasn't even an extreme case..... He's actually quite moderate.... It's because of that strange system that you believe that liberalism is a leftist philosophy, while the opposite is true... Sorry pal... don't tell me anything about politics... I've been studying this subject of a long time... A very long time... You have no clue about left politics... You've never seen it... You've never experienced it... Politics isn't a matter of extremes... But with only two parties doing nothing but having negative propaganda about each other, it's only logical the U.S. people can't know....

Why?

Here, I will take your ideology (look it up) and apply it elsewhere.

If a man rapes a boy, should women just stay out of it? It is a man's issue, right?

Let's continue.

Just because something may happen to a woman or a man does not necessarily mean that it is only meant to be dealt with by that sex. If Hitler killed only men, wouldn't that mean only men would have the right to bring him to justice or to deal with him how they would like? NO, men and women should deal with problems together.

Do you understand the meaning of the word ideology?

yes

Why pay men more in the first place, genius? People who do that think men are better than women somehow. Humans can be illogical, delusional, close-minded, and dumb. I think humans can manage being a little sexist. :)

Well then, why pay men more in the first place? BECAUSE PEOPLE WHO DO THAT BELIEVE MEN ARE SOMEHOW BETTER. pOlyTiKs