Tucker laughs at libs

I wonder why he wasn’t welcomed and lauded as the messiah he thought he would be. Lol hilarious that the Dems don’t get that those guys hate them too.

Sort of like the limp wristed Mayor of Minneapolis getting his ass handed to him by the black feral mob when he didn't want to disband the police department. Another proud moment in Progressive Pandering history.

Walks out there like the "White Savior" for all those poor down trodden, leaves like the Cuck he is.

Y'all are turned around in the head.

For YEARS AND YEARS, y'all kept going on about the Supremcy of States Rights and how the Federal Government was overreaching into peoples lives.

And now. When the Federal Government is trying to usurp law enforcement with no oversight- a clear violation of the 10th Amendment and the Posse Comitatus Act - you're cheering it on.

Either admit it was never about states rights or resisting tyranny or remember what you said was important and stand up for it!

Well you are wrong. Posse Comitatus covers the Army not Homeland Security. The federal government is within its jurisdiction to protect federal property and arrest anyone actively engaged or planning in attacking any Of said property.

As you are such a grand supporter of the 10th amendment then you agree that immigration clearly falls under the federal governments Jurisdiction and that makes sanctuary cities illegal. Funny how you ignore your hypocrisy.

He said he's sending troops to Chicago, Kansas City, and Albuquerque to handle "crime". That has nothing to do with federal property.

They’re not troops so quit saying they are. They are law enforcement and homeland security. Fully legal to dispatch to areas of the country to assist local law enforcement in handling increased crime and mayhem or to defend federal property in the absence of local control or cooperation. He could invoke the insurrection act and send troops to those cities if they are out of control. F**k you and all backers of criminal rule and Antifa BLM mobs.

😂😂😂war crimes, you are daffy. Protestors who shield provocateurs and criminals lose their protected status as protestors. Just because you support criminals and anti American Marxists doesn’t mean everybody has to go along with it.

Here you go

Bwahahaha, ya cause typing ahh mediocre on a stupid picture is genius.

says the chowderhead

Wow repeating the same simplistic meme three times. You are a creative genius aren’t you. Did mom tell you you were really good at memes? Well, she’s your mom not a critic.

🤣 Portland mayor still got gassed and run off the streets by the people he expected to laud him as their savior.

Your inability to think or make a clear argument is not hidden by your elementary school level memes. You probably believe graffiti is high art.

Don’t even mess with this turd. He’s justo liberal troll.

And the anarchist cries.

The anarchist, I mean.

I see ya' skipped right over that part where the Prez said he will only send in Fed troops to handle the citie's crisis if asked. The only thing these clown mayors have asked for is millions and millions of our tax dollars to rebuild what they let these anarchist/fascists destroyed. Fed Courthouse=Fed property which the Feds can defend and have been doing while the cuck Gov lets Portland burn and it's helpless law abiding citizens be terrorized under mob rule.

That's funny. I don't recall any official from Portland or Oregon stating they asked for the President to send in Federal troops.

Oh, I see.. as long as federal property is in jeopardy the President /can/ do whatever he wants. Okay. Still unconstitutional, though.

Actually defending federal property is the only thing that's constitutional. He can also send troops out to protect the highways and the post offices. Anywhere you see the law say "United States" that's talking about federal government property.

And it’s also constitutional to rise up against a tyrannical federal government.

Actually its not. In fact the citizens themselves can replace a tyrannical federal government any time they choose.

He was not asked. The Governor of Oregon received a call from the DHS Secretary AFTER operations had begun. She was told that troops were operating in her state. When she asked that they be withdrawn, they declined to do so and stated they would continue their "mission"

They have been asked to withdraw and have refused.

Trump

The word tyranny is just a cover for "whatever it is we want to do that the government won't let us." Telling people to wear masks is tyranny but sending militant feds in to abduct protesters off the streets and shooting them in the head is not? Repugs are f*cking dumb.

You going to use guns to take away our guns, then? If you think Trump’s recent actions are unconstitutional, read the second amendment and then your meme.

If guns get outlawed for the average Joe, they will use guns to take away your guns. That's how it works. The protesters are saying that a lot of people's civil rights are getting violated by law enforcement and the government is pushing back with lethal force. The second amendment doesn't say specifically that you get to own an AR-15. So if those get outlawed and you disagree, what are you going to do about it? Huh? Anyone?

I thought “guns kill people”. Hypocrite. The first amendment doesn’t specify that you can be a Christian or a Muslim either, just freedom of religion. If they get outlawed, I wouldn’t want to be the gun collector

Why wouldn't you want to be the gun collector... hm? What would you do if someone came to get your guns?

Let's just say we decided to be like Israel who has strict gun laws where only the military, law enforcement and armed security are allowed to carry them. My point is, I've seen a lot of comments on this board hyping a lot of violence if guns ever get banned on the premise that said violence would be committed against a tyrannical government who banned guns. What's the difference between that and what's going on in Portland and Seattle right now?

People are fighting a tyrannical government as we speak. Sending militant police out into the streets to shoot, maim, and abduct US citizens is the very definition of tyranny. Whether you agree or not about the systemic racism in this country, whether you believe African-Americans are disproportionately treated worse by law enforcement, there are a lot of people who feel very strongly about those things. All bad actors and agitators aside, at the core of this movement is a firm belief that big changes need to be made in this country to ensure everyone's constitutional rights are protected. Trump is doing nothing but reaffirming to the world right now that our government is tyrannical.

Nice argument, so props there. I think law enforcement, etc. is necessary when there is harmful unrest. Do you not see that? Anyway, you said you wanted constitutional rights protected, but in your comment, you said, “once guns get banned and yours get confiscated.” Double standard?

I brought up the second amendment as an example because there have been numerous posts here commenting that all hell would break loose if someone tried to take their guns. But now those same people are complaining about people who feel just as strongly about what they're protesting over as if they don't get it at all. Or maybe they were just idle threats...

All hell would indeed break loose, but you won’t admit it. The difference is the issue they’re “protesting” has already been solved.

Thanks. The constitution isn't black and white. One of the jobs of the supreme court is to interpret it. And not too long ago, back in 2008, they interpreted the 2nd amendment by including gun ownership for the purpose of protecting one's home. There is no obvious verbiage in the 2nd amendment giving people this right, just provisions for a "well-regulated militia" or army. Nothing about owning high powered assault rifles for recreational use.
In April, SCOTUS refused to hear a 2nd amendment case out of NY. So there is room for debate about many aspects of our constitutional rights regarding guns. I, personally, definitely think we need to get a handle on the mass shootings and the domestic violence involving guns.

As far as the civil unrest, I think there has to be other ways to quell the violence when societal / racial tensions boil over other than shooting protesters in the head.

The “well-regulates militia” is all the gun owners protecting their homes against the enemy, whether that be the government, murderers, other militaries, etc. It doesn’t specify any type of gun that cannot be owned and operated, so, for instance, Bobby has an AR-15. That is his armory. It doesn’t matter what type of gun it is. Also, so you know, there’s no such thing as an assault rifle until you use it to assault someone. Here’s something, too: hunting is recreation, and, for many, a way of life, so if you want to take that away, you’re going to upset many people. Citizens who legally own firearms are not the problem.

Yes, there may be better ways, but it is still better than sitting there and watching it happen.

It's also been called the great American melting pot but we know how that turned out. I wonder what Francis Scott Key would think now 200 years later after writing those words "the land of the free" if he would still feel the same. I doubt it.

Probably not because of people like you, who want to strip rights.

I guess it's only okay to deny rights from people with dark skin...? The government strips rights all the time under the guise of "law enforcement." That's what this whole thing is about. But it's easy to forget that when white supremacists are trying to muddy the issue so much that it becomes unrecognizable.

No. That’s not what this is about. I literally never said anything about stripping rights from blacks, and I’m not a white supremacist. Stripping the second amendment right from the people is a different issue than the “protestors”. You are the one that brought that up. The rights of the protestors/blacks aren’t being stripped. It seems that you are the one muddying two separate issues into one.

When our founding fathers wrote the constitution, they had muskets and crap. Nothing like what they have now. I don't think they had any idea of what was headed the country's way 200 years later.

I don’t think they would’ve cared because this is the land of the free.

2/3 House, 2/3 Senate, 3/4 of states. I suggest you get cracking, buttercup. Until then I will continue to build and keep those scary black guns that freak out so many weak-minded libs.

So what if 2/3 House, 2/3 Senate, and the President signs off on a country-wide gun ban. What are you going to do? Huh, musicman88240? What are you going to do about it?

Well, IF is a pretty big word. IF a frog had wings he wouldn’t bump his ass hopping. IF I had been born rich I wouldn’t have to work for a living.

So what would I do IF our entire government decided to circumvent that pesky Constitution and make all guns illegal overnight? Why, I would be a model citizen.

“No sir, there isn’t a single gun in my house. Yes sir, you’re welcome to look. The gun safe? I just keep my super soaker in there since all of my guns were lost in a tragic boating accident. Yes sir, a rogue wave sent them all to the bottom of the lake, never to be seen again. Would you like some coffee?”

And then they find them in the secret compartment in your garage and take them...? Then what?

Please, I was born at night but it wasn’t last night. No secret compartments so you can’t steal what you can’t find. I can in all honesty say there isn’t one single gun anywhere in my home.

Try not violently looting.