why have food stamps then?

You keep missing the point "They dont have to" they dont need to, they want to..
HUD, SEC 8, Liheep(bad spelling) etc etc...

My Cuz is on all of them she makes more in free shit from the gov that a person making 20$ an hr

The only reason she is poor is because she spends most of her money on drugs since her wife left her.
Her wife left her because she was on drugs..

Its 100% her fault

I did all her paper work for her b4, she gets 798$ a months from SSI even though she never really worked in her life. She gets food stamps, 2/3 rent paid by hud, She is supposed to pay 1/3 but the landlord raises it more than they wanted so she dont pay the 1/3, she gets free medical, almost free utilities, free phone, free net, free bus tokens, free rides to medical appointments(unlimited) and shopping 2 xs a month by welfare worker. LiHeap gave her new appliances.
Last week she purchased London Broil while I am eating PBJ at lunch at work.
she wastes everything, opens a can of soup, doesnt like it and dumps it in the trash.. wtf..

The Government keeps wiping her ass (and others like her) for her/them, they will be doing it forever..

There is a reason she is poor and its 100% her fault.She can get a free education if she wants at the local community college but she doesnt go..Its 2 blocks away. She can get some free classes at Temple, its a mile away..

theoretically.. what do you think would happen if her benefits were removed?

she would have to take one of the hundreds of jobs her dads side of the family offered to her.They have many political ties and politicians in the city of Phila.

Yeah? Funny how no one is looting the grocery stores.

Pathetic. Your laziness is absolutely pathetic.

So is your excuse making. You know this is wrong, but refuse to hold anyone accountable because it might cause a problem for your political agenda. Your justification of criminal acts is one of the weakest arguments of the left. Read up on neutralization techniques.

Oh, and I'm sure they waited until there was no more bread on the shelves at the bakeries before stealing tv's. Wanna buy a bridge?

Almost as pathetic as the laziness of the looters.

If they took that energy and channeled it into improving their lives, they wouldn't have to loot.

You just don't get it.
- America isn't about stealing.
- America isn't about destroying others' property
- America isn't about being lazy
- America isn't about entitlement

The reason Marxism has never caught on in America is because we don't need it. Anyone who understands what America is about knows that Marxism is not just un-needed, but contrary to what makes this country great.

When Marxism was conceived, in another country btw, class structure in most other countries prevented people from moving up in class. So an entirely new system would seem to be the only way to give people the opportunity to be in a better class, or more accurately, lower everyone to the same class.

In America, with hard work and persistence, you can move up in class as high as you want. That's the American Dream. Lazy looters and those like you who enable them are about as unAmerican as it gets.

Being wealthy doesn't mean those who are lazy, who won't work, who would loot and destroy others' property should be given anything they want materially, or even food.

You really have no clue what being an American means.

Oh! I see the problem. You're talking about Luxembourg, the wealthiest country on earth by GDP. Or you might be talking about Qatar, the richest country by GNI. I'm not sure which, but either way, the rest of us are talking about the United States which is 7th by GDP and 9th by GNI.