Haha. "Real science". That's cute.

And true too!

Where do you get this from? Name a source. And not "just trust me, dude".

I honestly doubt that.

What Kitchens said

It's either correct or it isn't.

To be even more precise: The *methodology* is either correct or it isn't. Because the cutting-edge boundaries of science are by definition unclear, and experiments at the frontier can still be worthwhile without necessarily always yielding the correct answer.

What is "the Left's science"?

https://imgflip.com/i/3u7ryx

Begone, paid troll.

Money was a moron

Yet influential today.

That still doesn't change the fact that he was a moron.

Ooooooookay.

What?

Well, his views are being taught and you think he's a moron. Think you might have issue with that.

I do. I just learned to ignore idiocy being idiocy.

And yeah, Lucy may be 5 bones, but hey, it's still evidence.

This nonsense again.

He didn't 'invent gender', he first used the term 'gender role'; several cultures recognised more than two genders long before he did that.

Someone should tell Trump about this John Money guy

I’m sure it’ll change his mind

Nice try, shill.

Indeed, when it came to the “T” of LGBT, he accepted their support in ‘16 but didn’t return the favor.

And he’s losing support from longtime Republicans for it.

So feel free to follow him off that cliff

Oh wow! A California tranny is mad at Trump. GAME OVER MAN!!!!!!

Tranny issues are REAL big on conservative minds lolololol

I actually feel kinda bad for Jenner. Marrying that skank would mentally screw up anyone.

This guy used to be a hero. Then he became 'famous' for being Kim Kardashian's stepdad, and it was downhill from there.
Glad I never watched the Olympics, except one time the Winter one on account of Lindsey Vonn Downhill Skiing for obvious reasons.

haha, I love the templates that turn up here when you type em in.

I think he should have his gold medals taken away as he was competing as a woman. But seriously, he was a great athlete. Altho a crappy driver.

Yes, there's alot of hidden gems in there.

Take away his kids and wives too.
Oh, and lobotomize both his heads, because if it took him 70 plus years and a flock of annoying offspring to realize he ain't into getting his 'thang on' with the womenfolk, then getting his Adam's Apple shaved and bad makeup is hardly a priority at this point when it comes to fixing his confusion.

That's amazing, btw.

Thx, it was one of those moments I asked if it was too stupid to post but I laughed for some arbitrary reason so i said f**k it.

You should submit that one.

I've had a real drought coming up with decent submitted memes lately. I just had the meme included denied in the politics stream, probably for good reason.

Oh my gosh, sheeeeeet.
Dank Memes stream then?

I've been distracted lately, so a bit slack with activity.

LGB"T" are still voters... some of them have political sense in spite of their poor lifestyle choices.

what do you mean, "poor lifestyle"? first you are denying that COVID-19 is serious, now you're a homophobe?

Why are you being bigoted to Kitchen, ya hetrophobe?

I just really disagree with him. and I'm not a hetrophobe I am straight myself

Fair enough but just because someone doesn't approve of a gay lifestyle doesn't mean they have an irrational fear of homosexuals.

"klkitchens_memer

LGB"T" .... in spite of their poor lifestyle choices."

I missed that. Should be LG"B""T". And L is redundant when G is there. Strike the L.

Yeah, but now "Gay" is used to refer to "stoopit,' or even worse, in reference to Green Gay, which is truly insulting to the Gays

You lost me with green gays.

That stupid annoying loathsome puke-city misbegotten putrid septic tank of a band.

Ah, yeah. The tryhardness of those frauds is truly repugnant. I used to buy guitar mags when they had decent transcriptions back in the 90's, so I've read a few interviews. Those wannabes were insufferable back then and got worse. The only song halfway decent was When I Come Around and that was a simplistic 4 chord song, though catchy. They should have stuck to songs about jerking off rather than overwrought politics. But at least they are somewhat honest about selling out unlike the rich millionaire commies in RATM.

That anyone would dare call that pile of Bubblegum Pop offal the "P_ _ k" word (I can't even say it in the same sentence with them, just makes me want to hurl din din) is beyond irksome.

Where does approval come into it? What makes a consensual relationship that someone isn't in, any of that person's business?

ok then should I say an anti homosexual

No, you should say nothing and let people have their opinions instead of labelling them, imo. But I know, that's what leftists do. About all they do...

I just find it unreasonable to be against something that doesn't harm anybody. Being gay never did anything bad to anyone. I respect people's religion, but I don't think that people should dislike or disagree with harmless things just because their religion said to. I think of it the same way vice versa. Just because you are straight doesn't mean you are bad. That is my opinion.

Junk science like global warming, gender changeability, abortion, evolution... etc... All the things they claim science supports when the reality is, it does not. Science and truth get in the way of liberal narratives.

Listen man. I'm right sided but going warning is real. The rest however it's accurate.

Sorry, that is supposed to say, global warming. A

I got what you meant. And no, it’s not real at all.

Evidence?

nah!

Buddy, look at the science, Global warming is real. We live in an ice house world that is slowly turning into a hot house world. Our atmosphere have over 400 parts per million of carbon dioxide. Which is a greenhouse gas. The last time this happened was a few million years ago.

I have. There is no science to support it at all. Just wild guesses and suppositions not rooted in any facts or evidence. Who measured the CO2 a few million years ago? Show me those actual records. Oh yeah. No one did. They guess and assume a lot of variables and ignore the true factors that get in their way. You’ve bought their religion. But you’ll mature out of it.

Wow you are way off Karen. There have been multiple studies thatsay that climate change is real. Yes, while climate change can be natural, this time, it is due to human activities. Now, why don't you get on your computer, dedicate an hour or so studying 7th grade science. And tell me what you have learned. I shall see you then Karen

Hope the Kool Aid at least tasted good. You drank so much of it.

You know what, I'm a Caprisun kinda guy. I am also more of a right-sided person. But I am not dumb enough to think that our planet isn't dying. I agree that hugging trees does nothing, but I don't ignore the facts. The world is getting hotter. And I also noticed that you also ignore the fact that evolution is fake! So why don't you go to Whole Foods on your Chrysler Pacifica, and buy some Vegekids for Jackson, your unvaccinated child, your 3-year-old boy. Of course, by the time you get home, Jason, your husband who works at Comcast comes home. Then you guys had a three-hour-long chat about "how you are sticking it to the man". Of course, you didn't realize that your housekeeper who is trying to raise money to save her child who has measles carried it into your house. Ergo, your family gets sick.

This is the reply for your latest comment about micro evolution. So you do not believe in the fact that homo neanderthalis and homo sapiens for that matter came from the homanian ansestor. Technically the first human. Which then became the chimpanzee and then went on to create the homo genus. Do you think that is hogwash? Do you think Lucy is hogwash? Do explain that my good man.

Lucy is like 5 bones.

Wow... that was a lot of babbling nonsense... I also don't ignore the fact that evolution is fake. I agree that evolution is fake. It's not science at all, but ever changing theory. Just like "climate change".

As for vaccinations, remember, I'm the one who is PRO-science, unlike you liberal sheep.

This is the reply for your latest comment about studying. If you studied evolution for a long time. Then explain why in different years, all 13 species of Darwin's finches have different beaks depending on if there is a dry or wet year.

Microevolution is not in dispute (changes within a kind), that IS science. Macro evolution, from one kind to another is hogwash as science has proven. The existence of one in no way supports the imagination of the other.

Uhh you just went against the most popular scientific theory, which is different than a regular theory. I suggest you dedicate one hour of study on evolution.

Already studied it a long time... nothing science about it. Science confounds the evolutionary myth constantly, so they keep changing it to fit science. Amazingly bad religion is evolution.

Another sheeple ensnared. I'm sure your tax dollars will solve the problem.

I don't want to sound dumb but, who is the sheeple in this scenario?

No offense but the person who thinks giving money to government will fix the environment.

The global warming nutters like you.

Well no, that won't really solve much.

Believe it or not, when you throw tax dollars at problems, they sometimes get solved!

Or at least alleviated

That’s why we have taxation, governments, and social programs

If not through collective action: What will solve this problem?

Everyone not littering like Timber says?

What do you seriously 'think' - and I use that term very loosely - they had some caveman with a gauge taking measurements?

deep sea mud* cores

Last time CO2 levels rose to great heights (modern man wasn't driving their cars around so ya' can't blame the levels on humans) the flora and fauna on earth enjoyed a long period of massive growth. And when you check the "climate" records and go further back than the 1960's you clearly see the earth has been much warmer and we are actually in a "cool" period. It's called factual science, you should try it.

I want blaming the humans in the last time this happened. Also, of course the 1960s was a cooler period, there were hippies at that time. Also, this ice house world of melting, and that had happened before. This time it's people. Also, one decade isn't a change of climate. That's multiple decades.

I was talking more about the early Cenozoic Era (Paleogene Period).

Ok, i reread your comment and yes, there were hot house worlds. This is an ice house world.

"Junk science"

eyyy the person who said this...

" I also don't ignore the fact that evolution is fake. I agree that evolution is fake. It's not science at all, but ever changing theory. Just like "climate change"."

...thinks he has the intellectual high-ground to call out what things are scientifically based and what things aren't.

Well, Saying that some magical holy God just created everything isn't exactly scientific either.

Yep, I do. Since I am pro-science and zero I’ve posted contradicts that.

aight. where do you think humans came from then?

The birds and the bees.

oh yeah. lol.

When a mommy loves daddy and they share a special moment...

You're an idiot

.

.

.

.

.

oh, and proof that evolution is a thing because in cases like yours, the gods forgot to let you take a bite out of the Tree of Knowledge or just got stingy with distributing brain cells because you're a few points shy of borderline, IQ-wise.

So just the science that the right-wing mediaverse has politicized and taught you to hate then

Gotcha

I hate no one. Not even you trolls

Good to hear

These charts don’t care about your hatred or lack thereof

I like this chart

Your charts are backed by openly fraudulent science.

Well, We're not the ones denying that we're killing the earth just to get more oil money.

No, your the ones perpetrating fraud and then passing it off as fact. See climategate 1, 2, 3, 4, etc...etc...

Listen bucko, the iceburgs are smaller, the oceans are higher, and so is the global average temperature. Besides, climate change denier a don't all exactly say true things either. Remember James Inhofe, who brought a snowball to "prove" that global warming is fake?

It's not fraudulent -- but if you don't like climate scientists, then just talk to some farmers, ranchers, foresters, wine-growers, fishermen, or others in professions whose livelihoods depend upon staying closely in touch with the natural world, and predicting what actions they will need to take next year to secure a good harvest, and plan and project 5-10+ years down the road.

They'll tell you what's up.

Example: Here's an article from a trade magazine where wine-producers discuss experimenting with grape varieties in Italy as a response to climate change. There are dozens more articles just like it.

https://www.thedrinksbusiness.com/2020/04/tuscan-winery-experiments-with-georgian-grape-to-fight-climate-change/

Not a science journal. Not a "liberal media" outlet. A trade magazine.

Because if they plant the wrong kind of grape and their wine suffers as a result, then they will go out of business and they'll be unable to pay their bills and feed their families.

Don't like climate scientists? Talk to vintners.

Temperature fluctuations from year to year is not climate change. It's normal and they've had to plan for hundreds of years like this.

it is not