oh yes, i remember now. the supplies were clearly promptly sent and she cussed out her thank yous for them. i remember how much sense it made at the time (lol).
one warehouse of stashed supplies does not implicate the mayor, but you say it 'substantiates what was already known' about her'. this is called jumping to conclusions.
when you say 'both sides' are guilty of infractions, or when other trumpies demand 'fair and balanced' treatment (for the dark side), you should ask yourself where the balance of infractions truly lies. but you can't do that because you have an inaccurate view of the number and size of the infractions. your assumptions in these arguments are messed up, my dear friend.
i think it's nice that Manhattan and whistlelock and others try to help you get to a saner, more factual place, but i just don't have that kind of time or patience, and i don't enjoy the process. i'm exiting these discussions now so i can work on things that matter to me. i wish you luck, health, and improved vision in the coming year. non-sarcastically. you're not a bad person ( :