Change Your Mind

Patrick Moore - The Power of Truth:

https://youtu.be/UWahKIG4BE4

There's none so blind as those who won't see...

Yawn...

That's Right kids, right after the Earth cooled from a hot ball of magma, it had the same climate of paradise until man came along.

scientists arent worried about the climate changing at all, theyre worried about the pace at which it's changing. the increased emissions of carbon dioxide since the 1800s has made the climate change mucher quicker than natural occurrences would, and life on this planet cant cope with quick, drastic changes to their environment

Too bad there is not 1 shred of proof proving a direct link to man's activities and any aspect of climate change. That's why all their reports are "experts believe" or "scientific consensus is" and not "the facts show"

thats what scientists say about literally everything they do, it's merely an acknowledgement that they could somehow be wrong

No, this is different, you're too close to your propaganda source, you're not seeing it.

prove it's different then :|

I already explained how there is zero proof showing it's true. That's what's different.

zero proof is called not looking up 'climate change proof' please i beg of you stop making idiotic sentences

conservatives will complain about liberals calling anyone they disagree with racist and then turn around and ignore blatant evidence because they disagree with it

There is NO EVIDENCE. Only models which always turn out to be wrong and projections, which are also wrong.

looked up your claim about the little ice age rebound
the problem it ended 'coincidentally' right when the industrial revolution was happening, when all the heat trapping gases were being released into the atmosphere at unprecedented rates. the argument you present also implies the existence of a 'normal' earth temperature that the earth naturally returns to, like the planet is a warm-blooded mammal. it's not

ill cite my source im not a PIRATE
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11645-climate-myths-we-are-simply-recovering-from-the-little-ice-age/

and a second source that talks about the little ice age thats more up-to-date than the first article
https://www.carbonbrief.org/is-climate-change-all-just-a-recovery-from-the-little-ice-age

ever heard of historical data which shows that the ice caps are melting very quickly and that sea levels are rising and getting warmer and less saline as a result, which is damaging animal life and coral reefs, or that natural disasters like hurricanes are getting progressively more severe, or how each month is hitting record high temperatures relatively consistently, or maybe that the australian forests and the amazon rainforest are on fire, regardless of whether the fires were started by arsonists the increasingly arid climate produced by carbon emissions is keeping the fires strong

Ever heard of rebound from the little ice age?

Here's proof: https://youtu.be/M1VJtER2IUE

Check out all the other links I posted here as well.

im like 2 minutes in and hes making claims like 'within 5 years it has shown to be the opposite' 'carbon dioxide increases after temperature' 'co2 going up and temperature going up has never occurred at any point in history, in fact it's the opposite' and he has not cited any of them, he just says them with a graph that shows correlation between temperature and co2 right behind him

i also really like how he complains about how the 4 inch book spanning 400,000 years doesnt show enough detail like detail f**king matters when youre talking about general trends spanning thousands of years

Gotta love how the narrative shifts from "climate change is a hoax" to "climate change is real but not caused human activity" long after the evidence has become too hard to ignore.

there are some who believe that climate change is real, caused by humans, and a good thing because plants use carbon dioxide

That makes sense until you take into account there not being enough plants to absorb said carbon dioxide. Not helped at all by the fact that the Amazon Rainforest is on f**king fire.

yeah but i think what they ignore the most is that the rising temperatures will also cause the ice caps to melt, flooding coastal and low-lying areas, as well as making the salt-water mixture unbalanced and killing off a lot of animals used to the ocean' current consistency

Having been around awhile, I've seen this movie before. It was fiction then, and it's fiction now. If science is on your side, you don't need to change past temperature readings to make them fit your predictions. It's a scam to add to government power, and if you can't see that, no amount of evidence will change your mind.

mans implying that we're the ones ignoring evidence :| point and laugh

The evidence against man-made climate change is too hard to ignore! How do people manage it? By succumbing to the fallacy of assertion & argumentum ad infinitum that 'the time for debate is over', & not realising that the debate is still very much ongoing...

"Is Carbon Dioxide Endangering the Planet? Craig Idso vs. Jeffrey Bennett. A Debate" - https://youtu.be/6wBDR-5ltVI

The United States has the best and most temperature data in the world. When you see the bottom chart in KylieFans post remember that Africa has very few stations and the temp shown there are mostly approximated. Top chart shows temperature readings following the CO2 rise AFTER the changes to the temperature readings- very conveniently how that works. Second shows maximum daily temps in US. Third shows how manipulated data changes the records- the past is changed to show lower temps thus making any warming seem more significant. Fourth shows how hot days have actually decreased. By changing data the government can use that data to buoy their fraud. Why would a government want to frighten it's citizens? It probably has nothing to do with increased power does it.

Oh look, it's the one guy on ImgFlip who actually makes a solid, (mostly) intellectually honest attempt to rebut the consensus theory of global warming with real-world observation and evidence.

Hi! Always a pleasure.

Where did you get these charts from if you don't mind my asking?

https://www.giss.nasa.gov, https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov,

Giss.nasa.gov — this link takes me to a homepage where all of the current content is decided pro-global warming consensus theory. So how exactly is the agency getting this so wrong, based on your graphs?

Ncdc.noaa.gov — Again this goes to a homepage. I’m not able to easily find these charts or the context of them.

I’m also not following what exactly you mean by “adjustment” of temperatures. You claim the United States has the “best and most temperature data in the world,” but in the next breath you claim that the government changes that data? When and how does that work? And if that were happening: why wouldn’t the scientists say something?

@sharps45 - "Why would a government want to frighten its citizens?"

Answer: "The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." - H. L. Mencken.

An Inconsistent Truth - https://youtu.be/1FdItN4mr7Q

The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change - http://climatechangereconsidered.org

The Greening of Planet Earth (1992) => https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ep5ptrPN6ns

Regardless of how one views this issue, it seems unwise to pump billions of tons of a gas into our atmosphere, that is known to retain heat.

However, to those who say "the science is settled" on the matter, you apparently don't know much about the scientific method.

Yeah, that's right, I'm talking to you, Chuck Todd, you potted plant.

If anyone is genuinely interested in exploring the other side of the story, & not just the mainstream left-leaning media version, watch some lectures from these guys on YouTube: Dr Patrick Moore, Tim Ball, & Craig Idso. If you type them guys in, you'll get links to many others speaking out as well.

Forty-seven comments & counting, yet the left keeps on telling us "THE TIME FOR DEBATE IS OVER!"

LOL!

Not to play liberal's advocate, but can you prove that consciousness doesn't create reality, thereby making humans responsible for everything?

Whoa... that's a seriously head exploding concept you are laying down!

Or, as I like to think of it, consciousness does create reality, thereby making humans responsible for nothing.

Where do I start? Do you have one?