Imgflip Logo Icon

Read you like a book.

Read you like a book. | '; ' | image tagged in we knew,obama | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
453 views 7 upvotes Made by WandstrasseHurensohn 5 years ago in politics
22 Comments
3 ups, 5y
What would your reaction be? Nevermind, we know.
1 up, 5y,
2 replies
Doctor Strangelove says... | YEAH, YOU KNOW WHAT OUR REACTION WOULD BE SAME AS IT IS FOR TRUMP
IMPEACH HIM | image tagged in doctor strangelove says | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
2 ups, 5y,
3 replies
Cool!

Did Obama ask Medvedev to get Putin to investigate Mitt Romney? No.

Did Obama withhold his support to Medvedev if Medvedev didn't do something? No.

Did Obama receive any criticism for this brief exchange? Yes.

Did House Republicans draw up articles of impeachment? No.

Hardly the liberals or Democrats fault that nothing happened to Obama here.

But please, do try again.
[deleted]
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
0 ups, 5y
Your point?
2 ups, 5y
Right you are. The two situations are nowhere near the same.
1 up, 5y
Did Obama have secret meetings with Putin accompanied solely by a translator?

Did Obama lock away in a vault and/or possibly destroy the transcripts to meetings?

Did Obama ever leave a meeting with Putin gaining anything that would benefit him personally?

Did Obama ever leave a meeting with Putin offering unprecendented and highly irregular concessions such as Trump did in Helsinki, and also with Kim Jung-un and Erdogan?

Did anyone associated with Obama end up in prison while working on his behalf?
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Fanaticism doesn’t justify fanaticism.
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
No, but history speaks for itself. One man's hot mic moment is another man's impeachable offense lol
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Except one the is an example of a President excluding himself from a diplomatic position because of an election, the other is an example of a President using the diplomatic position to effect an election. Similar, yes, but not equally damning.
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I mean, how low does your IQ need to be to think a senile child-molester who talks about his run-in with "Corn Pop" ever had a chance in hell of being nominated, let alone elected? My guess is about the same single-digit number that considers a classified request for a criminal investigation of a crime the suspect is confessing to commiting on tape, per the diplomatic treaty with said nation," to be "effecting" an election.
In fact, how does the "Muh Russian hackers" bullshit not fall into this same category? Haven't the left been using lawfare to "effect" the election since 2016? Or is that more "fanaticism" that didn't count because reasons?
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Amusing.

You're using the excuse that Biden's chances of being nominated, despite his well-received poll numbers at the time, somehow absolves Trump of trying to use a foreign leader to directly interfere in the election. Very clever. Though, your poor use of an ad hominem directed at me is a nice deflection but also irrelevant.

It was well documented before the so-called confession that Biden used his political pull to dismiss the Ukraine prosecutor. Though, he was not acting in personal interest, he was there at the request of the United States government as it was a bipartisan effort to pull that prosecutor for mutual interest across aisle of both Republicans and Democrats. Donald Trump failed to consider it criminal until Biden's poll numbers began to rise. So what exactly changed between 2016 and 2019 that prompted Trump to do this? Surely he wasn't stupid enough to think that the "confession" was somehow not public knowledge already?

I wouldn't sink so low as to insult you, however. Not unless you find facts insulting. Perhaps Trump would've found himself in less hot water if he had more experience in the political realm. Say what you will of Biden and the left. It offends me none at all.
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Hurr durr muh polls! If Biden actually had a chance, the CIA wouldn't have sacrificed him for this sad power play. Furthermore, you wouldn't know a single thing about an investigation into Biden if the left hadn't brought it into the light. If Biden's election chances were really hurt, he has Democrats to thank, not Trump. Otherwise, the investigation would have only damaged Biden if he was guilty, which he obviously is.
1 up, 5y,
3 replies
3 ups, 5y
Right, sure it is. Lol pathetic. As usual, your bullshit devolves into DNC propaganda when logic comes to play. Congrats on being a mindless drone, you drooling peasant.
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
My proof? Show me one article about the Ukrainian investigation of Biden not related to the whistle-leaker. Protip: it doesn't exist.
1 up, 5y
Of course it doesn't exist. The Ukrainian government was never investigating Hunter Biden.
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Right, no investigation, and the request was a government secret. So explain how Biden's poll numbers (lol) were hurt by Trump and not by this ultragay impeachment attempt.
2 ups, 5y
I don’t have to. This isn’t about poll numbers or quid pro quo. This is about Donald Trump attempting to undermine our election process, diluting the facts with pointless trivia as a defense, and potentially selling America to the highest bidder while pretending to stand against that very thing.
1 up, 5y
suddenly psychic powers
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
'; '