Democrats will look for any fairy tale in the quest for impeachment

I still think someone who got 'information' second hand is a gossipmonger more than a whistleblower.

Third and fourth hand.

Agreed.

I too whish to agree even tho I do not agree.

How do you know the so called "Whistleblower" got second hand info?

It is in his confession.

Can you link me to it. I cant find it anywhere

Read the Whistle-Blower Complaint

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/09/26/us/politics/whistle-blower-complaint.html

In the course of my official duties, I have received information from multiple U.S. Government officials that the President of the United States is using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election.

Yes, it's a collection of 2nd hand information. That was investigated by the IG for the intelligence agencies.

Who confirmed the complaint.

then the White House released a summary of the phone call.

Which also confirmed much of the whistleblower's compliant.

So. To sum that up.

The whistleblower heard some shit around the water cooler.

They went and talked to everyone. Everyone said "yeah, I was in that room and heard that shit."

Then the whistleblower reported it.

The Investigator General investigated it. The IG discovered that yeah, that shit happened.

Then the White House released a thing to assure everyone that the shit hadn't happened. EXCEPT that summary outlined exactly the shit that the whistleblower said happened.

Sec Pompeo was on the call. He had three chances when being questions directly about that call to correct the record. He had 3 chances to say exactly what happened and how it was all legit.

He didn't. He dodged the questions.

Trump denied it.

Then said he did it.

Then he did it again on LIVE TV but this time he added China and the Ukraine.

And now there's a rumor of a 2nd whistleblower who was in the room and confirms the details.

Pompeo denied nothing, because there was nothing to deny.

Try again. Try harder.

He was asked directly- what do you know about that call?
he dodged the question by saying "you have read me a report of the claims about that call..."

We know he was listening in on that call. We know that.

If was truly nothing he could have said, "I was on that call. That didn't happen."

But he didn't.

And that happened 2 other times.

What do you Know about arithmetic?

Would I need to ask you a more pointed question.

I am just going by what you say they asked him.

Nancy didn't even take time to read the statements or transcripts (not sure if she is literate , given she made the same excuse about Obama Care) before announcing that she was starting inquiries.

Why would I watch the idiots question (read, Try to entrap) good people.

Here's exactly when he dodged it.

https://youtu.be/5mA0liqWRyo?t=458

She asks what he knows about that call. He responds with "well, you've read me a report about a complaint..."

He could have said, "Oh, Martha, I was on that call. I heard the whole thing. That wasn't what happened. Here's what happened. I have first hand knowledge."

But he didn't.

He dodged with a non-answer.

When the first whistleblower doesn't work...

Funny how the dems just changed the rule that says a whistleblower needs to hear first hand information, not mere gossip, almost like they have a agenda or something...

Yeah, small problem of facts with that.

The rules were changed AFTER the whistleblower turned in their complaint.

The rules were changed after the complaint was filed by the IG.

A Trump appointee.

A Trump Appointee changed the rules to further clarify them.

A Trump Appointee.

Maybe I heard fake news. I'll check into it.

[image deleted]

Thanks

It might help if you had the internet.

Agree, annnnd it all leads back to the Democrats! I would rather be a deplorable than a despicable Democrat any day!

Nailed it

Left or right, I dont like how that cat is looking at those children, regardless of caption