Imgflip Logo Icon

This why we need to MAGA

This why we need to MAGA | . | image tagged in maga | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1,345 views 65 upvotes Made by anonymous 5 years ago in politics
52 Comments
[deleted]
6 ups, 5y,
2 replies
bacon | KEEP YOUR HEAD ON YOUR SHOULDERS! EAT BACON!  STAY FREE! | image tagged in bacon | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
3 ups, 5y
Y'all Got Any More Of That Meme | IF YOU RAN ON THAT PLATFORM IN 2020 I WOULD VOTE FOR YOU. | image tagged in memes,y'all got any more of that | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
3 ups, 5y,
2 replies
LOL - Shouldn't at least 2 of those women be in hijabs?
0 ups, 5y
Not if they don't want to. And I thought you opposed other religo- I meant Hijabs?
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y
Yes. Your meme nails it.. https://imgflip.com/i/2vcbmy
[deleted]
5 ups, 5y,
3 replies
You mean you need more mysogony and racism? Got it.
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
More than enough misogyny and racism coming from the left, don't need any more, tyvm.
2 ups, 5y
You didn't answer the questions yet.
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
So is that Poe showing an example, or a serious miss?
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
No, but it sure as hell suggests it if nothing else
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Except they're not even all black. Also I recognize two as bad, but do not know the two on the left.
3 ups, 5y,
3 replies
Non of them are Black but two of them are Muslim and the third maybe Native American, or somethin' point is their darker than usual and so an enemy. Atleast thats how the meme paints it, or atleast how the message is received
7 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Why don't you look at their actions rather than their skin color?
[deleted]
5 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Exactly!!
5 ups, 5y
And they say the right is obsessed with race, geez.
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Because those are the only Democrats to hit the Republican hate list?

That those particular women are singled out meme after meme and as somehow not being legit Americans because of being identified as an 'other' is not a designation given to them by their constituency that voted for them in the first place.
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I don't know who the 2nd woman is but the three others buddy around together, get pictured together for major publication front pages and share alot of, what many consider, anti American extreme views. They seem to share a certain distain for the country they became rich and politically powerful in, especially for being total noobs. They also seem to play fast and loose with ethics. AOC with the campaign fraud and Omar and her possible immigration marriage fraud. But i can see AOC being unaware of misdeeds done under her.

Those three are fair game to call out together imo.
2 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Other than Ilhan Omar's "something happened on 9/11" callousness, what have the others said that is anti American? Even AOC's cauliflower claptrap, while racist and ignorant, was not anti American.

Then again, given the anti Americanisms that's been spewing out of the Oval Office, that climate seems to be the thing now, so maybe I've missed something.
5 ups, 5y
No, there's been alot. I mean, I get it's subjective but there's been a constant strain that's been there since the beginning. Talib doesn't seem so bad but I'm going to look into it because my memory has been trash lately and I tend to lose track as the boundaries get pushed further and further. They all want the end of the 2nd amendment and wide open borders. And that's their mainstream views. They're part of the crowd like Newsom and Cuomo that want illegal aliens to benefit more from the government than citizens. Omar downplaying violence from the 9-11 terrorists is just par for the course.

I don't like to make a claim without backing it up so I'll compile a few things and get back to you.
4 ups, 5y
OM will confirm that I congratulated AOC for working with Ted Cruz to reduce credit card rates but then she said something dumb a day later lol
1 up, 5y
One is so-called African American, another is an actual African, Somali to be precise.
Ocasio-Cortez has some native blood but those people as a culture are extinct.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
"point is their darker than usual and so an enemy ....... or atleast how the message is received"

Speak for yourself. I thought the meme had to do with communists and general anti-freedom / anti-American. I know at least one of them presented a plan that is essentially a Trojan horse for communism. So I assumed the others did something similar. But I guess, if one has a racist mentality, they look at skin color before they look at actions.
1 up, 5y
Naw, man thats bs, but your entitled to zour opinion
[deleted]
5 ups, 5y,
3 replies
6 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Yes, only straight white males may be criticised.
[deleted]
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
2 ups, 5y
[deleted]
5 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I fear for you guys, it's too late for us, but you still have time. Fight these women, take it to the streets!
[deleted]
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
[deleted]
6 ups, 5y
Bring purity back to the Americas
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y
These three certainly are trying.. https://imgflip.com/i/2vcbmy
3 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Did the Native Americans have a similar meme in 1640, with pictures of four white women?
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
They were defeated in battle. The settlers didn't join the 'Native' society.
2 ups, 5y,
2 replies
So basically if you win the race war, then that is ok. Not sure that is the sort of planet I want to live on, where if you kill enough of the other people you can take whatever you want. It works out fine when you are the big bully on the block but things change and maybe later you become the prey.
5 ups, 5y
I didn't invent history.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
The Eastern Romans also had a similar picture in 1453, with pictures of four Turks.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Pretty sure the Ottomans Conquered The East Roman Empre(Byzantium) with a big friggen army
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Pretty sure we conquered the Natives with a big friggen army too. But people act like it was something horrible.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
A) I don't get the similarities and B) One was a Political entity the other a Cultural and Ethnic group. a Slight diffrence
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Mozai is always saying how the Natives were massacred and the Americans / Europeans stole their lands. I also take it that he thinks America should be given back to them or we should be conquered for restitution for conquering America. If not I fail to see why he is always talking about it.

Because the Native conquest is the only conquest he mentions I thought I would mention another conquest / annihilation of a civilization.

What do you mean by part B, who is the political entity and who is the ethnic group?
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Ah

"What do you mean by part B, who is the political entity and who is the ethnic group?"

Political Entity: Byzantine
Ethnic group: Native Americans
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I had to Google the definition of a political entity.
And I didn't exactly know the definition of ethnicity. I guess I tend to get it mixed up with race.

Although Byzantine was mostly Romans / Greeks it was also pretty diverse from my understanding. Constantinople welcomed people from across the world. Although the Turks conquered them, Venice did a lot to cripple them before the Turks conquered them. So perhaps I should have said three Turks and one Venetian.
0 ups, 5y
Hmm
[deleted]
1 up, 5y
Lol
[deleted]
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
So, banning slavery makes you a socialist?
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
No. Abraham Lincoln was a Marxist (he was actually pen pals with Karl Marx) in favor of Jim Crow Laws while Robert E Lee was an abolitionist. Abraham Lincoln only freed the slaves so he could devastate the southern economy, and so he could get the plantation owners angrier so they'd want to impose Jim Crow Laws. Slavery could've ended much more peacefully if everyone waited for the right technology to replace slavery, because it was on the rise. Meanwhile, everyone is okay with enslaving innocent nonhuman animals so they can eat their carcasses and reproductive fluids!
[deleted]
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
First, an economy built on slavery should get abolished ASAP.
Second, I don't the technology on the rise would stop the slavery going on.
Third, how did he support Jim Crow Laws?
And what do you have to support your claims?
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
During his famous debates with Sen. Stephen Douglas, Lincoln explained to the crowd: “I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races … I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races from living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be a position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”

Lincoln was no different than most white males, North and South, at the time. He was a white supremacist.

SOURCE: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/did-lincoln-racism-equality-oppose/
[deleted]
1 up, 5y
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
.