Let the investigations into the criminal behavior begin! Oh, and if you complain, that's obstruction!

Actually it IS proven that Hillary mishandled classified information. Why she is not being prosecuted is just beyond me.

The DOJ instructed the FBI not in indict Hillary for gross negligence and struck
a deal to hold evidence. In other words obstruction of justice.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/peter-strzok-clinton-doj-struck-deal-that-blocked-fbi-access-to-clinton-foundation-emails-on-her-private-server

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/lisa-page-said-fbi-discussed-charging-hillary-clinton-with-gross-negligence-in-2016-and-doj-told-them-no

lol exactly. Obstruction of justice in favor of democrats.

Why is this so complicated? If Mueller could have proven collusion, he would have.

He didn't, so in the absence of proof, there is no proof of collusion.

He couldn't even get the civil burden of "preponderance of evidence" let alone the criminal burden of " beyond a reasonable doubt." If he could have, he would have.

He said something along the lines of "If we had full confidence that the prez did not commit obstruction, we would so state" You will find that that isn't the same thing

The meme addressed "liberals" not Mueller.

And it also adressed Muller Man

No, it didn't.

Well then. Okay

... and Mueller's boss said Mueller could have reached a decision if he wanted to. You will find that to be the final word. You know... because Barr is the boss.

"Mueller's boss said Mueller could have reached a decision if he wanted to"

If he did, Barr would have to fire him. I mean if he had found Trump guilty he would have to fire Mueller. Because charging a sitting president is against DoJ policy. That means going into this there never was a chance Trump was gonna get a guilty verdict from Mueller. But instead, Mueller said something along the lines of "If we had full confidence that the prez did not commit obstruction, we would so state". Which means that he can't reach a conclusion because there is enough evidence of obstruction that he can't in good conscious give trump a <"Full Exoneration"> (<==> is when I speak with an exaggerated Trump accent, because sometimes when he talks he does those funny things with his hands and I am trying to imitate that with the (<>)) The Senate needs to decide as it is the only constitutional organ that can charge a sitting president. Mueller said that he found the prez being charged by the DOJ to be unconstitutional

Coulda, woulda, shoulda... liberals can't deal with reality. They always have to invent delusions to insulate against reality.

By the way, dumbass...

only the HOUSE can charge a President. Only the SENATE can remove a President from office. If you are going to pretend to be smart, you might want to actually read up on the subject matter. Else, your intellectual superiors will come along and rhetorically kick your stupid ass all up and down the block.

"liberals can't deal with reality. They always have to invent delusions to insulate against reality."

So I am wrong for explaining why I think Mueller has done what he has done and why I think Barr's statement is bs? Am I to shut up and just nod? Yeah right. Also, I am a Social Democrat

"only the HOUSE can charge a President. Only the SENATE can remove a President from office. If you are going to pretend to be smart"

So I never did claim to be smarter than you, atleast I cant remember doing so. But i might have as a n insult, though if I did so you can rest easy knowing that I didn't mean it really and just said so, if I even did so, as an insult. And I Was unaware of that fact! Thank you! Though I coyld do without insult

It's not my fault that you are a stranger to logic and math. Once again, maybe you should have Mommy help you.

"It's not my fault that you are a stranger to logic and math"

How is it logical for one liberal to represent all liberals? And how does one even calculate that?

One Liberal + Hypocrisy = All liberals Hypocrite?

I think we just cracked Einsteins Theory of Relativity