Free Starbucks

Free Starbucks  | AND IT WAS AT THAT MOMENT THAT JACOB UNDERSTOOD WHY THE ALT RIGHT IS GROWING | image tagged in memes | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
11,433 views, 195 upvotes, Made by Natalie_vance 3 months ago memes
Add Meme
Post Comment
reply
24 ups, 3 replies
. | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
20 ups
THE POINTS DON'T MATTER JUST LIKE LOITERING IF YOU'RE BLACK | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
18 ups, 2 replies
. | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
At least Starbucks is trying to make it right
reply
15 ups
I'M HERE FOR THE... FREEDOM COFFEE | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
10 ups
lol!
reply
11 ups, 1 reply
. | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
My neighborhood Starbucks. Hehe
reply
5 ups
Spread the photo, it will be fun to get Starbucks into more trouble.
reply
21 ups, 2 replies
:)
reply
16 ups
reply
12 ups
reply
20 ups, 1 reply
reply
18 ups
reply
15 ups
reply
13 ups, 1 reply
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
YOU GET AN UPVOTE
reply
9 ups, 1 reply
Stop shouting
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
NO AND YOU GET AN UPVOTE
reply
9 ups, 1 reply
BE QUIET!!!
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
NO AND YOU GET AN UPVOTE
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
U P V O T E
reply
5 ups
U
P
V
O
T
E
reply
13 ups, 1 reply
reply
14 ups, 1 reply
Lol!!!
reply
5 ups
reply
12 ups
reply
10 ups, 2 replies
reply
10 ups
Thank you kind sir
reply
5 ups
YOU GET AN UPVOTE
reply
8 ups, 1 reply
Poor guy. I bet he's just imagining sticking that megaphone up that guys ass but is also aware he needs to pay rent for the week.
reply
11 ups
Lol. Right
reply
8 ups, 2 replies
Why are they pestering that guy? Wouldn't give them extra ketchup packets?
reply
11 ups, 1 reply
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2018/04/18/starbucks-incident-is-a-reminder-that-liberal-companies-with-woke-leaders-also-have-racism-issues/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.5d57a4540820
reply
10 ups, 3 replies
This pic is from demonstrators about that?

I don't get it, they weren't buying anything, told to leave, and loitered. Maybe some folks get treated differently in that situ based on skin tone, but bottom line, the law is the law, and store policy is store policy. Don't do bad things, and you won't get caught.
reply
16 ups
Exactly.
reply
13 ups, 3 replies
Normally I would agree with you but this is different, Starbucks has a policy of allowing people to come in, sit use the wifi. What I haven't heard was were they being disruptive to staff or other customers, in which case the manager would have been well within her bounds. Its not like the press would hold back on information that didn't meet its narrative. coughcoughfergusoncoughcough.
reply
21 ups, 4 replies
The bottom line is we don't know the whole story. We never know the whole story. All we hear is, "these guys were innocent black men who were arrested for sitting quietly at a table, waiting for their friend." It's the same bullshit we hear all the time these days when it comes to black people being arrested, shot at, or killed by cops. "They weren't doing anything wrong, so racism...."

I'm getting sick and tired of hearing this kind of crap. White privilege is only a thing because black people won't take responsibility for their own mistakes. Everything is the white man's fault because of "white privilege." I'm white and I want some of this white privilege I keep hearing about.
reply
16 ups, 1 reply
Lol. X D
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up, 1 reply
If Americans don't like getting treated like Jews, they should have gotten Christian founders.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up
Stuka my dick, you know i'm right.
reply
15 ups
You never know any more. The press has done a brilliant job the last 10 years of teaching me to trust nothing.
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
From all accounts - theirs, staff, police, witnessses, video - they were sitting quietly.

The issue isn't getting arrested or shot in general but that such was done BECAUSE of race. Basic, "Shoot at color first, ask the corpse questions later"

The meme concerns reaction to an incident where racism was alleged.
Bringing 'white priviledge' into it automatically raises the question why would you brinng up the issue in the first place, and why should it bother you if you have no such priviledge nor guilt regarding such.

I'm 'white' (allbeit on the olive toned side), yet that aspect is not an issue to me. I've been on both (positive and negative) ends of that gig due to appearance and ethnicity. To me it's just a reality that won't go away because of denial. I haven't forgotten what my mother's ancestors (pops was a recent import) have been guilty of and have been victimized by. I choose to learn from that history and try not repeat such mistakes.
reply
11 ups, 1 reply
I'm not saying they were in the wrong and I'm not saying they were in the right. I'm saying these stories of supposed racism and hatred toward people of color and "here's video proof of it" knee-jerk reactions are getting old. We truly don't know the whole story and therefore we're reacting based on a short video clip posted online.
reply
4 ups
Yes, they are getting old. THAT'S the problem. It's 2018. People don't like being called racist? Then maybe they should STOP acting racist.
reply
7 ups, 5 replies
You make it sound like there aren't actual instances of white police officers mistreating black people.

Here are two examples. The cop in the first incident was charged with murder, I believe. The two cops in the second incident were fired. Both incidents were caught on film, so no one can say "that's not what happened".
reply
9 ups, 1 reply
That's how you are interpreting it. Not what I'm saying at all.
reply
3 ups
That's just how it sounded to me, that's all
reply
8 ups, 1 reply
There's also the problem that these occur after several incidences with narratives that were proven false (i.e. "gentle giant" and then proof of a strong arm robbery) that when they occurred, most people who weren't pushing innocent blacks vs evil cop narratives were no longer paying attention.
Also there are incidents of police on white violence/shootings, but those don't get the press coverage.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
I think you're referring to the Michael Brown shooting in Ferguson, and I agree that the whole "hands up, don't shoot" thing never happened, from all available evidence
reply
7 ups
Then there was one black guy who was shot because he did, properly, inform the officer when asked that he had a concealed carry permit, so yes there was a gun in his vehicle. He wasn't making a move for it or a threat, just a proper disclosure. The media pretty much buried that one because they are anti 2nd amendment. We can't have people enraged when someone is shot for exercising thier 2nd amendment rights.
reply
9 ups, 1 reply
There definitely are instances i sure.
But the Constant protesting and rioting even when the blacks are in the wrong makes instances like yours seem less polarizing.
Nowadays theres si much chimping out over everything it's just not important to us anymore.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
6 ups
Lol. It's not veryPC, but these riots and protests do resemble.
reply
8 ups, 1 reply
So I'm agreeing with you.
It's just that everytime a gangbanger get justifiably shot it's the exact same reaction.
From the protesters, media and community.
A black person got killed, better burn down black owned businesses and my neighborhood!
reply
1 up
I agree that rioting is really stupid and hurts their own community, and I also agree that there are instances of black people getting shot justifiably, and the media spreads the narrative that it was unjustified.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
That happens to white people too, but you never hear about it because it doesn't fit the narrative. Some people simply have no business wearing a badge.

It would be a better idea if people could assume that race is coincidental until actual evidence is presented that it isn't. I suspect we'd find that race IS coincidental 95% of the time.

I am also very disconcerted that the severity of a crime and it's commensurate punishment is considered different, depending of what ethnic or social class the victim belongs to. That's not a road we should be going down.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
I definitely agree that police harassment and misconduct happen to quite people as well. I believe it's very likely that in cases where police brutality happens because of the suspect's race, that it probably happens to black people more than white people. That's just a guess, though, based on the history in this country of how black people have historically been treated (and mistreated).
reply
1 up, 4 replies
This is the train of thought people end up boarding when it's pointed out that the ratio of black to white convicts are flip-flopped when compared to the ratio of the citizenry as a whole.

A more objective conclusion would be that the reason the ratio of blacks to whites in prison is so skewed, is because they commit a greater ratio of the crime. Perhaps it would be more productive to analyze and determine why THAT is true, and suggest proactive solutions to THAT problem. But I digress...

This skewed ratio of convicts leads to the drawing of an erroneous conclusion that blacks are unfairly prosecuted (or persecuted) by the justice system, which in turn brings on righteous indignation against law enforcement which further evolves into violent resistance. This has the ironic effect of skewing the ratio even further. Is it possible that police "brutality" statistically occurs more with black suspects (assuming it does), might be because they tend to be more likely to resist authority, because they've been told all their lives that law enforcement is unfair to them? Worth examination, anyway...

People are always looking for cookie cutter solutions to everything, and most of these problems have multi-tiered and multi-layered causes that go far deeper than people realize. There's not one easy answer. But historically speaking, playing the race card at every opportunity whether is applies or not, hasn't helped the situation, it's only served to alienate people, erode away sympathy, and give up the high ground.

I agree that most of the issues in minority communities have their root causes in the actions of rich white people, but I suspect they aren't the same actions, or the same rich white people, that most entertainment-educated Americans think they are.

Leftist policies have driven fathers out of homes, made excuse after excuse for delinquent behavior, incentivized women to produce larger families that they are capable of providing for, forcing children into an indifferent education system that doesn't teach practical or useful knowledge, and inadvertently creating a clan-based culture that feeds on fear and lawlessness. But all of this is because... racism. Mhmm. Sure.

Leftists have had generations to create this dumpster fire, and no conservative living or dead is going to fix it in a mere decade. But as long as people think throwing blame around is going to fix anything, let's at least make an effort to throw it where it belongs.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
"I have yet to be shown that there is any validity to this assertion."

Racial injustice can be hard to verify sometimes. Imagine that someone fires a black employee just because they're black, but says they're being fired because they're late for work too often. Even though their race is the real reason they're being fired, if you suspect that's the case, how could you possibly prove it?

"You make excuses for violence and lawlessness, then you're justifying and validating it."

I never made excuses for violence, nor did I validate it. I simply explained why I think some people do it. I didn't say it's right that they do it.

Large urban areas in this country tend to be run by Democrats. Off the top of my head, I don't know of any that are run by Republicans. Pretty much any large urban area will have areas of poverty. To focus only on those areas while ignoring the prosperous parts of the city is dishonest. California is run by Democrats, and has some of the wealthiest citizens and most prosperous businesses in the country. I'm not saying it's *because* of Democrats, but the fact remains.

Detroit is in the shape that it's in because automakers left the city and went to the suburbs. Did that happen because of liberal policies? I don't know. Chicago and Philadelphia have areas of poverty, but they also have well-off areas as well.

Mississippi is a deep red state, and it ranks among the lowest in the nation in terms of health, education, employment and annual income. Easily one of the most conservative states in the US, and it's a mess.

"It's all on the left..."

Really? All of it? That sounds absurdly hyperbolic. I'm trying to find middle ground on which to agree with you, but when you paint "all" of the left with this overly broad brush, it makes it difficult.

"I'd be willing to bet real money that if a culture of individualism, responsibility, ownership, merit-based advancement, practical and vocational education, and free-market economics were encouraged in one of these areas, you'd see measurable improvement within a couple of generations."

I agree with that statement. And the question then becomes: what happens to people who need assistance (employment, financial, etc) because they can't do it on their own?
2 ups
"...someone fires a black employee just because they're black, but says they're being fired because they're late for work..."

Don't be late for work? I don't know what to tell you, other than "presumption of innocence". In other words, if you can't prove it objectively then it is irrelevant.

"...never made excuses for violence, nor did I validate it. I simply explained why I think some people..."

And you don't see how that is the same thing? I remember a psychological evaluation I had to take for a job a long time ago. One of the questions was; "Do you think people steal because they are hungry?" I didn't know how to answer the question, because none of the options read; "It doesn't matter why." Reasons are excuses, and excuses are validation.

"...Mississippi is a deep red state, and it ranks among the lowest in the nation..."

It's also not urban, it's rural. Rural areas always test lower than urban areas, all other things being equal. Apples v Oranges.

"...but they also have well-off areas as well..."

And those areas are typically dominated by whites. And yet somehow it's always the right that's racist.

" sounds absurdly hyperbolic. I'm trying to find middle ground on which to agree with you, but when you paint "all" of the left with this overly broad brush..."

I can't help what it "sounds" like. You're looking for "middle-ground" because I guess... feelings? I'm looking at facts because... solutions. You're also getting defensive because you think I'm attacking Democrats. I'm not. This isn't a red v blue thing. One of the big weapons of leftists is the hijacking of words and their meanings, don't let them succeed. The truth is that liberalism, I mean classic liberalism, has far more in common with conservatism than it does with leftism. The left has hijacked your political party and they've commandeered your lexicon. Stop worrying about how things 'sound', and focus on facts. The truth is often ugly and unpleasant to look at.

"...agree with that statement..."

Maybe you're a conservative and you just don't realize it. :D

"...what happens to people who need assistance..."

The same thing that happened before FDR. Communities, churches, private charities.

It's fine to use the government as a safety net, the problem is keeping that safety net from becoming a hammock, or worse a Rete Retiarius (look it up). This is what you get when feelings supersede reason, and intentions are valued above results, which are hallmarks of leftism.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
I agree that we should look at the reasons why black people are disproportionately represented in the prison population, and try to figure out solutions to the problem, but I don't agree that black people being unfairly treated by the justice system is an erroneous conclusion.

And I do agree with you that it leads to a vicious cycle of anger and mistrust between law enforcement and minority communities.

"Is it possible that police "brutality" statistically occurs more with black suspects (assuming it does), might be because they tend to be more likely to resist authority, because they've been told all their lives that law enforcement is unfair to them?"

Yes, that is definitely possible. And it's also possible that some (not all) people who resist police officers do so because they actually have been mistreated by them in the past, leading to deeply-entrenched mistrust.

I agree that playing the race card doesn't really help the situation, but there are times when racial injustice has actually happened, and needs to be brought to light. I believe that people like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton do more harm than good, however, regardless of what their motives may be.

I believe that some liberal policies have hurt families, but I would call it extremely inaccurate to place the blame solely at their feet. Conservative policies, both now and in the past, have done their fair share of harm as well.
1 up
"...don't agree that black people being unfairly treated by the justice system is an erroneous..."

I have yet to be shown that there is any validity to this assertion. I mean using actual facts, not 'feelings'.

"...definitely possible. And it's also possible that some..."

You basically said the same thing I did, just with different words. I don't care how "mistreated" you've been, violence makes things worse not better. Doctor King understood this, Malcolm did not. You make excuses for violence and lawlessness, then you're justifying and validating it. With that justification, you are helping to perpetuate the "vicious cycle of anger and mistrust between law enforcement and minority communities".

"...some liberal policies have hurt families, but I would call it extremely inaccurate to place the blame solely..."

I said "leftist", not "liberal". Surprisingly big difference, I recently learned.

I appreciate your attempt to seem fair by trying to spread responsibility around, but it's disingenuous. If anything it's "extremely" accurate, with facts and statistics to back it up. I pointed out specific examples of the policies and their long term effects on poverty-stricken urban areas that have been governed exclusively by leftists for 50+ years (Detroit, Chicago, Philadelphia, just to name a few).

You think that's wrong? Fine, show me. Point out to me the urban centers of poverty consistently governed by conservatives for 50 years, and the negative effects of conservative policies and values on minority communities. Sorry, it's a trick question. There is no such place, it doesn't exist.

It's all on the left and their "enlightened and intellectual" solutions that have never solved a single issue, problem, or crisis, for impoverished minorities, and have instead demonstrably made things an order of magnitude worse for these people they claim to be trying to help.

I'd be willing to bet real money that if a culture of individualism, responsibility, ownership, merit-based advancement, practical and vocational education, and free-market economics were encouraged in one of these areas, you'd see measurable improvement within a couple of generations.
reply
0 ups
"...if you can't prove it objectively then it is irrelevant."

That's all I was saying. Someone could do something like that for racist reasons but it can be nearly impossible to prove. But that doesn't mean it didn't happen for racist reasons.

"Reasons are excuses, and excuses are validation."

Reasons are explanations, not excuses. Example:
"Why were you late for work?"
"My car got a flat tire on the way here."

That's simply explaining *why* you were late. It's not pushing the blame onto someone else. It's not saying "don't make a big deal about it" or anything like that. It's simply giving an explanation. It's not excusing or validating it.

Your original question was about urban areas run by Democrats. Since we don't seem to have any large urban areas run by Republicans, we can't evaluate how they would fare in a similar situation. What you're basically doing is saying "look at this thing where we can only examine Dems, and see what a horrible job they're doing." It's not a fair assessment unless we have something (like large urban areas run by Republicans) to compare it to, but we don't. It's like someone saying "I made ten widgets in one hour!" Okay, I don't know how long it takes the average worker to make one widget, so I don't know if that's impressive or lousy. Maybe they normally take fifteen minutes each, so making ten in one hour is a new record; maybe they normally take two minutes each, so making ten in one hour is so bad, he should be retrained or even fired. I have no point of reference.

I will say this, though. I can pretty much guarantee you that any large urban area run by Republicans would have crime, shootings, muggings, drug use, areas of poverty, homelessness, etc. Why? Because Republican policies are just that horrible? No, because every large urban area anywhere has those problems (to varying degrees)

I don't know what some people on the right being racist has to do with wealthy areas being predominantly populated by white people.

"You're looking for "middle-ground" because I guess... feelings?"

I'm looking for middle ground so we can figure out what the best solutions are to things we both agree are problems.
reply
0 ups
(part 2)

"One of the big weapons of leftists is the hijacking of words and their meanings, don't let them succeed."

I see people on the right do that as well with words like patriot, family, faith, freedom, etc.

"The truth is that liberalism, I mean classic liberalism, has far more in common with conservatism than it does with leftism."

I haven't really studied classical liberalism, but from my understanding, what you just said is true.

"Stop worrying about how things 'sound', and focus on facts. The truth is often ugly and unpleasant to look at."

I try to do exactly that as much as I can, (but I admit I'm not perfect).

"Maybe you're a conservative and you just don't realize it. :D"

I consider myself center-left, so I do agree with conservatives on a number of issues.

The safety net/hammock/gladiator net analogy was a nice touch (and yes, I had to look it up)

Thankfully, I can't count myself among the ranks of those who value feelings above reason.
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
But the policy IS for patrons.

I'm not going to pretend enforcent of it hasn't been lax nor hasn't had its biased moments (I've had more than my fair share of being followed by staff in stores and ID'd at my college campus AFTER I was already in (one guard did so in the bathroom once!) while friends lighter toned and less Punky looking than me entered without being asked, etc). But they were asked to leave and refused, by both staff and police. From the looks of the place, it wasn't exactly empty, and reading up on this I saw that in more urban (and thus crowded) locales, customers might be asked to leave if they remain without buying for long.

Getting arrested seems extreme, but they were asked to leave and refused. That itself was a disruption. Also bear in mind, nothing has been said of them getting treated in any rough or disrespectful manner either.
reply
9 ups, 1 reply
All good info, and worthy of consideration when looking at the incident. I'm uually the last to jump on any of these bandwagons if at all.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
It's not so much that I actually disagree with your view, just trying to look at what has been presented as facts so far in this case.
Eyebrow raising, yes, but in accordance to what was said to have happened, what other recourse could there finally be?
reply
2 ups
reply
2 ups
The free wifi is for paying customers...
reply
10 ups, 3 replies
reply
12 ups
I'm white. I've been asked to leave a Starbucks because I wasn't buying anything (more than once), so sometimes I leave and it doesn't make the news, and other times I just buy a coffee so I can stay.
reply
12 ups
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
0 ups
IV *cough* Vie.
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
LOL
reply
4 ups
heh heh
reply
9 ups
reply
6 ups
reply
5 ups
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
reply
9 ups, 1 reply
reply
3 ups
Loved that movie
reply
5 ups, 2 replies
Seriously, I'm a Liberal, and even I know you don't give the front-line employees shit...they're just trying to make a living...give their corporate masters the shit.
reply
8 ups, 1 reply
No kidding. The guy is a barista. Hes not making much probably
reply
1 up
The one good thing I can say is Starbucks pays above minimum. Still not a living wage these days, but they also provide benefits to their employees.

The problem comes about when the entitled class decides they have a right to treat a Barista, a store clerk, or even a customer service call center rep like shit. These people aren't there to be abused. They're just trying to work.

If you have a grudge with a company, protest corporate, boycott the brand, change service providers, get a petition going...but leave the front-liners the f**k alone. Two thirds of them are kids trying to pay their way through school and the other third are adults who can't go***mn find any other job.
reply
7 ups
That being said, the summer I worked at Starbucks and the Nude Bike Ride stopped in for iced fraps on the middle of their run was...fun.
reply
5 ups
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
People are yelling at me with megaphones so now I feel justified in becoming a nazi. Seems legit.
reply
4 ups, 4 replies
No people yelling saying your racist and saying "your dna is an abomination" and nobody cares also the alt right aren't nazis it's a movement about ethno nationalism do research and find out about the white genocide happening in Europe and USA same thing also happening in Africa
reply
8 ups
Well said
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
Alt right are neo nazis making themselves sound new and hip. This is welcoming to normies who want to be hip and cool and down with the kids these days, even though Richard Spencer is nearly 40.
reply
1 up
The leader of the Labour Party is a socialist who hates Jews he would be called a neo nazi in my opinion as nazi is national socialist workers party therefore not far right the right and left are economic if you are far right then most likely you will agree with the term Laissez-faire if you are far left then you will most likely want to remove any form paper money and want the workers to have the means of production and will not like the rich believe inheritance is not a form of wealth be in favour of taxing the rich at higher rates alt right is authoritarian right the authoritarian part meaning pro life not wanting to decriminalise drug use have certain speech be considered illegal the government having a lot of influence in peoples lives not supporting gay marriage and most likely a traditionalist tldr nazi is national socialist and the alt right are free market capitalists from what I've seen correct me if I am wrong (with more than one source unless it is from themselves)
reply
5 ups, 2 replies
"White genocide?"
reply
9 ups
reply
3 ups, 3 replies
Victims are identified and separated out because of their ethnic or religious identity that is stage 6 in the 8 stages of genocide
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
WHAT victims are being identified and separated out? Gypsies?
Because of WHAT ethnic or religious identity?

Kindly explain this stage 6 in the 8 stages of genocide, in fact, give me the run down on them all.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Segregation by race for black peoples safety im not saying that all black people like this all I'm saying is it is a dangerous road to go down also I'll go through the stages that I think are happening stage 3 "One group denies the humanity of the other group. Members of it are equated with animals, vermin, insects, or diseases" what this means is it allows you to commit violence we see this with anti fa who punched Richard Spencer for no reason other than his beliefs "your dna is a abomination" and that may I add got no backlash 5 "Hate groups broadcast polarizing propaganda" the universitys are one of the biggest places in the UK we have the guardian which is read at the BBC and its where they get their sources channel 4 there is no non socialist media anymore but I digress 6 you already know 7 "It is 'extermination' to the killers because they do not believe their victims to be fully human" and no people aren't rounding up the whites and killing them no they are trying to replace us with migrants because it doesn't matter we are to scared of being called racist and islaphobic also put a group (Muslims) who practise bigamy and also they **pe our children look at Rotherham, Rochdale and Oxford, Telford, Newcastle, Aylesbury, Keighley, Peterborough and quite a few more
reply
4 ups
You had 1 period in that whole thing.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
1 up, 2 replies
Do you know about the white genocide happening in Africa its a serious problem because we are allowing migrants from those countries they will bring those ideas with them
reply
1 up
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
0 ups, 2 replies
Areas that we colonised in Africa are better off because of it and but colonialism doesn't give them a reason to genocide
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
1 up, 1 reply
I don't see how I'm responsible for the actions of my ancestors who colonised Africa if its my responsibility then Arabs need to take responsibility for the enslavement of my people every race has done bad things in the past but for them to act now is disgusting and quite frankly I don't care they will not come to my country and try anything hopefully they rest of the uk will have some brains and not let us get invaded although it's already happening thanks multiculturalism besides they have received aid from us and what is happening in that country its still a sithole "the biggest minority is the individual"
1 up
Nuke_mecca

"I don't see how I'm responsible for the actions of my ancestors who colonised Africa if its my responsibility then Arabs need to take responsibility for the enslavement of my people"

"Areas that we colonised in Africa are better off because of it and but colonialism doesn't give them a reason to genocide"

You don't see how you're responsible for the actions of your ancestors who colonised Africa yet you take responsiblity for making the part of Africa you exploited and robbed dry, "better off"?

Your callous disregard for the brutality, theft, and millions killed by your illustrious thieving rapist murdering parasitic ancestors aside, your logic isn't. Take no blame, but will take credit?

Why is it that white supremacists discredit their own asinine notions simply by being their own intellectually handicapped selves?

And when did Arabs enslave your people? And why are you stuck on that while crying that your people's heinous actions are not forgotten?

UK? Thought you were German?
reply
1 up
What genocide?
reply
1 up
Other-identification is an adaptation to self-identification.

6 out of 8 is a perfectly normal reaction to finding out the West's borders are gonna include Saudi.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
"alt right aren't nazis it's a movement about ethno nationalism"

Um, WOT?

And white GENOCIDE? Who them white folks kiling now?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei the national socialist workers party nobody in the alt right are socialist and all the nazis are dead besides you can't speak for all of the alt right as they believe different things take Richard Spencer and millennial woes listen to what they have to say and come back to me with a QUOTE it is important that it is a quote
reply
1 up, 1 reply
You're really form the UK? What is that incoherent gibberish?

What genocide stiil?

How is "ethno nationalism" different from Nazism, neo or otherwise?

Do you're own homework. I asked YOU a question, not for you to tell me to go quote your source.
White supremacists are they themselves the best argument for mass sterilization because they're all mentally deficient.
reply
1 up
First part German that's why the translation is after also ethnic nationalism is a form of nationalism about closed borders the majority of the country is the most important which is not bad if I go to Africa I don't expect representation because I'm not part of them nazi is national socialism which Hitler couldn't do as he was set on killing the Jews he had 2 opinions to start to kill the Jews or to form a socialist country then when war broke out he had 2 options continued to kill the Jews or attempt to win the war he chose to kill because they in his mind are inferior and yes white supremacist are bad but white nationalist aren't big difference between also the reason why I said quote was so that I would be able to find something that you disagree with and it will be something someone said not a strawman
reply
3 ups
it's being flooded with normies.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
That face when the red pill kicks in :D
reply
9 ups, 2 replies
Hey buddy
reply
4 ups
hey stranger :)
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
look at you...halfway up the top 100!!
reply
9 ups, 2 replies
Yea lol.
Memeing hard.
How have you been buck-o
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
not bad, been busy working but i opened a new account recently to get some memes done. thought i'd swing by and see what's happening.
reply
9 ups
Well glad to see you, back.
Raydog doesnt really make memes anymore.
Forceful deleted.
Reallyitsjohns back.
Dash is still killing it.
Same shit. New faces. The meme generator is better.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Nat, you said "buck-o"

That's cool.
reply
8 ups
Lol. ;)
reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 2 replies
I just find it completely hilarious that this whole event happened in what is considered to be a bastion of yuppie and liberal culture. This is pretty much the last place that one would expect such racist behavior to take place.Just goes to show, sadly I might add, that racism occurs all over the political spectrum.
reply
7 ups
This is so true
reply
2 ups
That is why I believe it was more of the manager following store policy than it actually being racism. It is just too easy to call things racism without proof these days.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Funny. I used to be a crazy liberal. Some of my early memes even reflect it. So glad I broke free!!!! Great meme :)
reply
7 ups
reply
[deleted]
5 ups, 1 reply
reply
4 ups, 2 replies
reply
10 ups
Proof they'll always cry.
Even if we gave reparations. They'd cry.
reply
9 ups, 1 reply
Lol.
They're so stupid these days they want to be separated again.
LOL
reply
4 ups
I think that should be the test. If the answer is no because it'd be racist, then its probably racist.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
He should have told them to order something or he'd call the police.
reply
10 ups
I think they did.
It's funny how they make this into a race thing.
Like the most liberal establishment on the planet in one of the most liberal cities in America is calling the cops just cuz hes black. Cmon.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
3 ups
Look guys, look, there is more Breaking News!
Flip Settings

Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator

Show embed codes
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
AND IT WAS AT THAT MOMENT; THAT JACOB UNDERSTOOD WHY THE ALT RIGHT IS GROWING
hotkeys: D = random, W = like, S = dislike, A = back
Feedback