Imgflip Logo Icon

Charlie was smarter than his critics, and that's why they hated them. He showed their Ignorance.

1,677 views • 26 upvotes • Made by BrianRayl 3 weeks ago in politics
Make your own GIF
25 Comments
7 ups, 3w
Buddy Christ Meme | image tagged in memes,buddy christ | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
7 ups, 3w,
3 replies
Just to be clear, Charlie Kirk did not use "hate speech", Charlie Kirk used speech that they hated.
4 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Retards, not smart enough to debate him. He challenged their intelligence and then them. Look at the hate from the Indoctrinated 12-year-olds. Embarrassment
Embarrassment or awkwardness is an emotional state that is associated with mild to severe levels of discomfort, and which is usually experienced when someone commits a socially unacceptable, or frowned-upon act that is witnessed by or revealed to others. Frequently grouped with shame and guilt embarrassment is considered a "self-conscious emotion", and it can have a profoundly negative impact on a person's thoughts or behavior. Usually, some perception of loss of honor or dignity is involved, but the embarrassment level and the type depends on the situation Continued in Wikipedia
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
You call people "indoctrinated 12-year-olds" right after using childish insults like "retards"
1 up, 3w
That’s not the point the point is they are uneducated and are unwilling to think for themselves.
3 ups, 3w
Just to be clear, those aren't mutually exclusive
0 ups, 3w
Tell me you are into tribalism without telling me you are into tribalism ahh comment
4 ups, 3w
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Maga can't understand that two things can both be true at the same time
1 up, 3w
Sure thing, buddy… 😂😂
2 ups, 3w
Charlie Kirk, more like Charlie's Inferno
2 ups, 3w
He never had the brain processing power to be taken seriously.
0 ups, 3w
F**k America!.
1 up, 3w
ok
5 ups, 3w,
2 replies
Using dishonest tactics and logical fallicies doesn't make someone smarter. It shows he can't have an honest debate. That's also why he was too much of a coward to debate professionals and experts.
7 ups, 3w,
2 replies
He debated anyone. His rational for going to colleges to debate was because the majority of professors at those colleges are Marxists. Colleges have changed from focusing exclusively on education to indoctrination. It is not just to create new Democrats but to create Marxists Democrats.

Kirk did not stipulate who could debate him. There was absolutely nothing stopping any of those Marxist professors from coming out of their ivory towers to debate him.

Don't let your hatred of that man cloud your judgment. Kirk was a walking encyclopedia. What he said about Christianity and our founding was spot on. He knows what he was talking about. And there is just so much more than what he said.

Thomas Jefferson when he was president, worried that members of Congress would not make it to their home state in time for their Sunday church services, established a Christian church service that was held on Sundays in the halls of Congress.

Jefferson took selected passages straight from the King James New Testament and published a book. I have a copy of that book (not one of the originals, it was printed about the time I bought it). He required all incoming freshmen in Congress to read his book. All it contained was just passages he selected from the Bible, without any commentary.

It is true that Jefferson was a deist. What fascinates me is some etymologically impaired atheists actually think that means he was an atheist. He was not. He believed in Jesus Christ. His problem was he didn't believe in the miracles contained in the Bible. He only believed in Jesus's moral teachings.

There are historians who have done extensive research into all of the writings of the founders and our founding documents and just how absolutely Christian they all are.

It would absolutely frighten today's leftists who are convinced that Christians want to create a theocracy. Our founders were so adamantly Christian, much more than a lot of Christians today. And yet, they did NOT create a theocracy.

They did, as Kirk said, create a government that was compatible with Christianity but valued individual liberty (also a Christian teaching) above force of any kind. That is why we never had a state religion. It is also why some of the states were allowed to have a state religion within their states. That was NOT a violation of the 1st amendment because at the time the 1st amendment only applied to the federal government.
6 ups, 3w,
2 replies
Charlie was a threat to the demonrats control system. You know their game, silence, threaten and if necessary, use violence, the demonrats never change. I think Charlie would have eventually gone into politics and would have easily won any office he ran for. Calling such a man names just to dismiss his life's work is not only the sigh of a weak mind, but also a sign of desperation. The left fears exposure more than anything else and Charlie publicly shamed the best the left could muster up. He not only destroyed their stupid ideas and polices but mocked them as indoctrinated drones.

I will admit that I did not follow Charlie faithfully, I would occasionally watch him debate some student, or professor. It was always entertaining and informative. From what I understand turning point has chapters are everywhere now, making the man a martyr was a huge mistake, and the leftists will regret it.
6 ups, 3w
Dropping truth smart bombs as always. Well said.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
"silence, threaten and if necessary, use violence" is the maga game

If calling people names is "the sigh of a weak mind, but also a sign of desperation" why do you do it?

He don't destroy any liberal ideas or policies. That's why he had to resort to lies and fallacies and dishonest tactics.

Maga is desperate to make him a martyr. He's just a dishonest loser.
2 ups, 3w
But how are they lies he give his reasoning loud and clear it seems like you’ve never even taken the time to see just one of his full debates with another person
1 up, 3w
If he wanted to debate professors he could try to set up scheduled debates with them. During school time they are teaching classes and grading papers, not wandering around the quad.

Hardly a walking encyclopedia. And what he said about the founders was misleading. He probably got that garbage from david barton.

I've never heard any atheist say that Jefferson was an atheist

"how absolutely Christian they all are" right after acknowledging that Jefferson didn't believe in the miracles of the Bible

If the founders were so "adamantly Christian" (and yes many conservative Christians today want a theocracy) why doesn't the Constitution even mention Christianity or the Bible? It's because they wanted all citizens to have freedom of religion.

The first amendment guarantees freedom of religion. The Bible prohibits freedom of religion. They are not very compatible.
6 ups, 3w
Madcows lies got him killed
1 up, 3w
He did debate experts often actually mostly college professors and other liberals in the education system but still considered experts
Make your own GIF
Created from video with the Imgflip Animated GIF Maker
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
God Bless America