Ofc these endless "confessions" by Imams and Muslims don't change the Liberal programming, and he knows that very well

His god is not the same as Christian GOD

Correct, he is an adaptation of Yahweh, unlike the Christian Roman pagan dieties which are a deliberate corruption.

Jesus was not Pagan

Jesus was Roman? Oh, that's right, he was. Whether he was really born as one or invented by one, that is the question.

Jesus was not Roman. Hebrews/Jews kept very meticulous genealogies.

Judea was a Roman province at the time.

There is no Hebrew/Jewish genealogy that names Jesus.

Actually there are many, as Jesus was a common name at the time. The clincher for historians is the unused bone box that carries his name his brothers name and his father's name. The question of whether or not Jesus existed is not debated by serious historians, there's more proof of his existence than just about any other figure in antiquity. The real question they discuss is if he was divine.

Yeshua bar Yahweh. That one. Kind of hard to miss.
Not to be confused with Yeshua bar Abba AKA Barabbas.

The James Ossuary? Because Jesus, James, and Joseph were really rare names back then.
And that's providing that it's actually authentic, which given the habit of believers to make forgeries of this stuff...

There is absolutely no proof of his existence other than the cult that was built around him. Now given that it's a sizeable cult, that may be indication that maybe he did exist. But then again, just about nearly as many people believe that there is a blue elephant-headed God also.

Invented? Lol you'll going to burn.

Small price to pay for eternity.

According to Revelations, 144,000 of the Saintd Chosen (that's Jews to you and me) will enter the Pearly Gates. Plus a few Gentiles judge by the worthiness of their works.

That's 60,000 short of the number of babies who get aborted in the world every day. DAY.

So that's billions and billions who will burn. According to the New testament.

According to the Old testament, there's no such thing as Hell. There's no such thing as Heaven either.

God's Law.

PS: You just violated the Judge-not Clause. You just sent yourself to Hell.

So are you a Jehovah Witness? 'cause that's what JWs believe, not Christians.

Jehovah witnesses are yet another Christian's sect.
Perhaps if you find some time to spare you can look it up in Revelations.

Christian*

No, jehovah witnesses believe in act based salvation, that defies the only requirement that Christians have, belief being the only requirement.

That's nice.
Jehovah witnesses are still yet another Christian sect.

The Bible says you have to be baptised as well

OH no MODDA curse

Nah bro. Those guys are chosen for a purpose and anyone that believes goes to heaven those listed get a special place.

144,000 Jews and a handful of Gentiles. Will go to a Heaven. That Jews don't even believe in.

There is as much evidence of Jesus existence as there is for Alexander the Great or Julius Ceaser. We’ve been through this before.

No there isn't.

Still waiting for you to post that too.

Would you require an additional 4 months?

You couldn’t refute it then. How would you refute it now.

Refute something that doesn't exist? How do you refute something that doesn't exist? Tell an even more convincing fairy tale?

But go ahead, don't let me stop you, indulge the viewing audience and post it anyways.
I've been brimming with excitement over the release of this information for months now, I'm not sure how much more of it I can take.

Historical evidence does exist though you can incorrectly claim it doesn’t exist it actually does.

Only Paul was a contemporary of Jesus. The others you listed didn't live until after Jesus died so they're hearsay

It is historical evidence regardless. And it confirms existence.

Show me the contemporary account of Alexander the Great that wasn’t written after his death. If you can’t he didn’t exist right? How about Socrates? Give me a contemporary account about him. We could go through this for untold numbers of historical figures.

God told people to follow man laws, God only had 10 laws everything else is up to man. He just wants to USE Allah (Satan) to control you.

Um,
no,
no,
and
no

Biblical Perspective: The Bible encourages believers to respect human authority and obey laws as a testament to their faith, but it ultimately points towards living a life that aligns with God's will.
2

In summary, while both laws are important, the focus is on living according to God's law, which is seen as the ultimate authority in a believer's life.

As long as the laws don't conflict. See Daniel.

No.
Complete subservience to Yahweh is the law. For Hebrews. The Word is the Law.

Christianity corrupted the religion and turned it into a 1-hour Sunday activity.

Christianity is 24/7

You yourself started off by saying it wasn't.

Did you ever consider the fact that maybe, just maybe, some of the slogans you post without thinking about are actually right? You are correct, 100%.

In Christianity, God's law is subservient to man's law. And that's okay, just look out your window. See anybody getting stoned lately for using the toilet on the Sabbath? A century ago child brides were common. Here in the United States. Man's law changed that. So you're right about that also. Islam is an entire century behind America. An entire century. Behind America. An entire century.

That's like a hundred years. That's a lot. It took us 1900 years to change, but by God - excuse me, by golly - we did it

Where's all of Mo's witnesses that walked with him & gave testimony of his miracles & teachings?

You could look it up actually. There's actual evidence independent of the movement that documents the existence of Muhammad.

There's absolutely no historical evidence of the existence of Jesus during the first century other than the cult that emerged around him.

Wrong absolutely wrong. There are historical records from both non Christian Jewish and Roman figures.

Sure, go ahead, post it

I'll wait

Been waiting how many months now since this was last brought up with you?

There are absolutely zero historical records of the existence of Jesus.

I have posted repeatedly. See Josephus, Pliny, etc. etc.

Islam is 700 years behind Jesus Mo was invented 700 years after Jesus was murdered

No, Islam was invented 610 AD, Christianity was invented 325 AD.
That's one decade side of three centuries.

Jesus wasn't murdered, he was executed for violating Roman law.
Or was he?

Wrong again. Jeez Christianity was known well before 325 AD

Council. of. Nicea

My gosh

Christianity existed well before the council of Nicea, my gosh.

You sound so much like a pharisee.

Thanks for the compliment. However there is no record of any Pharisees whatsoever having ever said anything about Christianity or Jesus or anything else even remotely connected to that.

Key words "the law" referring to the covenant (contract) between God and the Israelites. "Until all things are accomplished" some of those things are the saving of all people through the messiah. Notice how jews and Israelites still exist and follow "the law"?
Jesus came to save people

Yes. God's law. His contract with his people. And only his people.

Jesus never saved anybody. Not even himself.

Which ten laws?

Was invented in the 7th century. Is 600 years behind so it runs a primitive program. Its Prophet's perception of goodness is based on the lack of actively doing evil. like, "Look, you stole an apple and we DIDN'T cut off your hands, even though we should. So merciful"

The hard truth is mohammed was lucky to be born in the 7th century and not now. Under today's standards he would be in prison for pedophilia, terrorism or both. Until Muslims accept his methods conflict with the modern world and have no place in it, Islam will never be respected.

Under today's standards most men prior to the 20th Century would be in prison for pedophilia, terrorism, and both. In America. And the rest of the world.

Lol, save it, none of them raped a six year old

The problem with whataboutisms is that you're basically saying that you agree that what you're defending and trying to deflect away from is bad.

Remember, if it wasn't for Liberals in the early 20th century, 10 and 12 would still be the standard.

Its funny you mention that. Do you know where the age of consent even comes from?

A box of Cracker Jacks

Amazing, somehow you think that forgives the child marriages in Islamic countries in the modern world. I will ignore the lie that liberals ended child marriage in the USA since you invented that one yourself. Keep pretending islams image problem is not its own fault if you want, the rest of humanity watches and learns from what they see, not the lies apologists tell.

Republicans are still fighting to keep hold marriage legal in America

child marriage*

Guy forgot what he said here 2 days ago about illegalizing it.

aduzlm.jpg (click to show)

You mean how yesterday you thought it was legal in the United States and that by making it illegal that might for Muslims? You know, in the comment of yours that you yourself deleted and then pretended you never posted?

Oh, wait, it would appear that in a certain region of the US it is legal.
Hate inform those in the reading audience who are unaware, but up here in the civilized North it ain't.

Its banned federally already. It's redundant

No, it's not.

Continue living in your dream world if you want, it doesn't change the truth, only islam allows child marriages and the rape of children below the age of consent. Your attempt to justify pure evil by using historical mistakes changes nothing.

You mean like you justified it the other day before deleting your comment and then denying that it was your comment even after I saw it?

I take it you're not very familiar with other religions and cultures throughout the world and their practices? Post WWII West is not the only population on Planet Earth.

And as you've already been informed, such practices weren't exactly what anyone would call exceptionally rare in these United States of America prior to Liberals making it illegal at the onset of the 20th century. If only you saw what they were doing out in farm country back in the day, then you'd understand why they had an illegalize it.

And it was made illegal, despite your assertion the other day. In the US, anyways.

Where are you from?

Save it, I already told you that my comment was deleted, not by me. I reposted it a second time.

The rest of your crap is just that, any attempt to blame history on today is a logic fallacy and false justification.

BTW, I spent the best part of my adult life protecting, defending and hunting muslims. I understand the evil imbedded inside of islam and know the differences between a religion and a destructive control system masquerading as a religion. And save the all religion crap, you only appear foolish when you do that.

I saw your comment that you deleted. I saw it. I saw your comment.
I also saw you trying to explain it away after denying that you posted it.

Love how you keep accusing me of what you yourself posted when I didn't post anything resembling it. But hey, you got a job to do.

Neither did Muhammad

Actually it has, Islam was pretty mellow till the 20th century, when fundamentalism and nationalism were promoted first by the Nazis and then later by the US and UK as tools to influence them in order to use them as proxies against Soviet influence.

Ever hear of the Barbary Wars? They were the first official war the US fought and the enemy was the Ottoman Empire and their Barbary Pirates.

That's nice.
I reckon that would not be included in the entire 17 years in United States history that the United States of America was not at war with some country or another.

The Barbery wars and Ottoman empire was when ?
The discovery of America was. . . ?
I think there's a whole difference in time between the two

Barbary Wars 1801
US of America declared 1776
Revolutionary war ended 1783

1783 to 1801. Seems like the timeline works.

See this guy knew the answer
Deflect that

You believe Pangea is how the settlers got here. You literally told me this.

Let's see what the book says according to YOUR knowledge about it while you're comparing it to the information on Google.
Or should I go to the library of Alexandria and find the answers to it

That story depends on who their Imams and scholars are talking to, and for what purpose. Amongst each other there's another story.
imgflip.com/gif/9x5hka
imgflip.com/gif/a5df9z

But yes, the former U.S establishment's building of a globalist empire, is being forcefully dealt with atm. while hyper activating all defensive resources. It's been, and is still, one heck of a spectacle to watch. Liberals won't start yet another Iranian Revolution 79, (yet they try all over the west) without resistance.
They want extremes to rule, so they can easily dismantle them when needed, and then be heroes

That has to be the most ignorant take on Islam ever heard. They were not mellow to the Persians whom they conquered and converted not to the Roman lands they invaded and conquered throughout the Middle East. I don’t think Constantinople considered them mellow when they tried repeatedly to take that city. Islam was murdering and massacring non believers throughout the period that happens to coincide with what we now call the dark ages.

Guy's copying what I posted in the past about the conquest of Iran and Rome east and south/southwest into North Africa as if I didn't know.

Do you know why Islamic communities sprung up in ports of call and along trade routes established/utilized by Muslims?

During the European Dark Ages which is what we refer to when we refer to the Dark Ages, the reverse was going on in the Middle East and Central Asia. It isn't called the Islamic Golden Age for nothing.

In case you haven't noticed, despite the partisan hack rhetoric, no, nobody's was frozen in a world of 1400 years ago for 1400 years, in the crossroads of the world, no less.

My gosh.

And so we agree what we call the dark ages in Christianity was the “golden age” of Islam because they were raping, killing infidels for hundreds of years. Doesn’t sound mellow. Characterizing it as such is ignorant or purposefully inaccurate.

It was called the golden age of Islam because of the developments in art, math, science, medicine, and philosophy

Right they were absorbing it from the lands they looted, especially the Persians and Eastern Romans. Of course this was all obtained by subjugating those areas by violence. How come that doesn’t outrage you like it does with native Americans? Oh I forgot, leftists have selective outrage.

Where is your source that that even happened? You're basically saying that Muslims are incapable of any medical or mathematical or scientific discoveries on their own. So prove it.

You claimed that Mohammed’s tribe came up with all that on their own so you prove it. The eastern Roman Empire and the Persian empire were both well known for their advancements. You prove that the desert tribe came out and showed them how. 😂 ludicrous.