True Facts

look charlie kirk payed the ultimate price. he was censored. being killed is worse than being censored. but hell never get to have those discussions which is very sad. and at a time where censorship is increasing in most places around the world. o reily constantly says things that would get him taken off the air if he was on network. but we would never think about taking him off the air.

all kimmel said was pointlessly that the killer was conservative. political violence doesnt make sense. political violence makes someone despised in america. in any case this is a good time to discuss ending political violence and ending censorship.

basically the first amendment doesn't allow the government to censor speech except in rare circumstances which is not what kimmel said. we all say hateful speech. hate speech and hateful speech are not the same thing. I think kimmel was sick of walking on his tiptoes over the climate in america over all the assassinations weve had. trump is ruining the country. but you also need to be respectful to charlie kirk who is no longer be able to convince the world what he believes.

there may be a reason to fine kimmel. but his speech shouldnt be censored. a lot of us wondered how anyone could think political violence would be supported by anyone. it makes absolutely no sense to me.

“Bringing firearms to a rally might be legal, but it doesn’t make things peaceful — it intimidates others from speaking freely.”

You see, that would make sense to most peaceful people “Bringing firearms to a rally might be legal, but it doesn’t make things peaceful — it intimidates others from speaking freely.”, but that doesn't seem to be the case or apply to Trump / MAGA rallies:

“In many states, open carry or concealed carry at rallies is perfectly legal. Exercising a constitutional right isn’t automatically intimidation — it’s just citizens using freedoms guaranteed by law.”

“The First Amendment protects speech from the government — not from criticism or consequences. Exercising rights doesn’t mean others can’t respond.”

Well, it seems that the ultimate criticism and consequence paid, right?

“Criticism is one thing. Violence isn’t ‘criticism,’ it’s a crime. Free speech doesn’t deserve the death penalty.”

So you and I can agree, that is great, we don't do those things. You understand that those who live by the sword, die by the sword.

“I agree — we don’t do violence, that’s not the answer. But I can’t agree that simply exercising your rights means you ‘deserve’ violence. Living by the law isn’t living by the sword.”

Words are a very powerful sword. None of the players in that game came in with clean hands. You don't get to do the Devils work without consequences.

“I hear you. At the end of the day, I think we both agree words matter. Thanks for the exchange.”

And I respectfully disagree with your opinion, and I am willingly hoping that you can accept that

You can agree, disagree, agree to disagree, none of that changes the world we live in.

“We probably won’t convince each other, but I respect your right to your view just like mine. Thanks for the exchange.” And also I agree that we cannot change the world we live in, because some people choose violence.

Well we will see where you really stand. You having only three memes under this current name and seem to have taken a Reich point of view, doesn't appear you are new to the game or genuine:

“I’d rather keep it about the issue than me. We may see it differently, but I think the debate is worth having.”

“You don’t have to believe I’m new or genuine, but attacking me personally doesn’t address the point."

Dude, no need to put quotation marks around your own comments, it seems like you're quoting someone else. I don't mean that as an attack.

I see you just joined. Unfortunately, attacking others happens here. Hang in there, pay it no mind.

Also Calling it a peaceful hate speech rally is a contradiction in itself. Hate speech may be legal, but it’s not harmless.

How would you define the Charlie Kirk "Debates"? They were nothing but a mini maga rally allowing hate speech to be spewed.

“In America, disagreeing with someone doesn’t make it ‘hate speech.’ That label gets thrown around anytime a conservative speaks. Debate means hearing things you don’t like.”