politics › blank Memes & GIFs

Humor and discussion around U.S. and world politics. Criticisms and debates are encouraged, but be constructive and don't harass anyone.

4320 followers

politics

To post images in this stream, please .

Moderators

Ser.Donald.P.Suttingsworth OWNER StalkingHorse

Create your own stream

Imgflip Pro

AI creation tools & better GIFs
No ads
Custom 6x6 profile icon and new colors
Your images are featured instantly in auto-approve-sfw streams
Your images jump to the top of approval queues

K*LL BABIES BECAUSE THEY'RE INCONVENIENT?
NO! WHAT ARE WE...
MONSTERS?! PROVIDE FEMALE HEALTHCARE SERVICES TO REMOVE A PARASITIC CLUMP OF CELLS THATS A PART OF HER BODY; BECAUSE...I DONT KNOW...R*PE OR MEDICAL ISSUES OR SOMETHING? AAH...SO IT WAS THE WORDING I USED THAT WAS THE ISSUE.. | image tagged in angry cat,happy grumpy cat,blank,laughing hitler | made w/ Imgflip meme maker

by soopadoopakoopatroopa

119 views, 6 upvotes

Blank

Blank | In 2024, you will have a choice between a Marxist, and a Nazi. OR, You COULD Vote Libertarian. This November, do the right thing, and do NOT vote for a Marxist, OR a Nazi. In 2024, Vote Libertarian. | image tagged in blank | made w/ Imgflip meme maker

57 views, 1 upvote, 6 comments

To see it for yourself, search "Joel Stetkis interview". --unrelated side note: Joel Stetkis anagrams to Stole Jetski.

To see it for yourself, search "Joel Stetkis interview". --unrelated side note: Joel Stetkis anagrams to Stole Jetski. | The following is transcripted from an interview where an ostensibly cream-of-the-crop GOPer is pressed to explain the legal argument underscoring his claim that Shenna Bellows was in the wrong to remove Trump; from the primary ballot. Needless to say, his entire response was nothing but a dodgy exercise in issue avoidance which, at points, was effectively reduced to "because I said so," "because Gavin Newsom said so,"; "because a bunch of other unnamed people allegedly said so." By the end, it was glaringly apparent Mr. Stetkis was operating on an inferiority complex and no legal substance. I'd say "enjoy" but watching this GOP slow-ball flail uselessly as the trainwreck progressed was just sad. CNN's Boris Sanchez: "If there is part of the Constitution that says, if someone is an insurrectionist, a state can remove them from a ballot, and she is designated to make that decision, according to Maine's constitution, then isn't it up to her?"; Maine GOP Chairman Joel Stetkis: "Her reasoning behind her decision is completely wrong."; Sanchez: "What is the reasoning?"; Stetkis: "No matter how you ask the question, her decision is completely wrong."; Sanchez: "Joel, give us the details. Why is it wrong?"; Stetkis: "So Boris, this is the thing -there are attorneys and judges, Democrats and Republicans across this country that have said she is wrong. Not one time in my life have I ever agreed with Gavin Newsom, the; governor of California, until now. Gavin Newsom also believes the people should have the right to vote—"; Sanchez: "I'm trying to get to the basis of your legal argument, and you are not giving me any details; you are saying that it's flat-out wrong. Why is it wrong, from a legal standpoint? Is it that you think her interpretation; of the amendment is wrong? Is it that you think it doesn't apply to the presidency? It's not a self-executing portion of that amendment? Is there any detail you can give us, other than saying that she is flat-out wrong?"; Stetkis: "One of the things that we have seen in the last week are very highly respected lawyers and judges, Democrats and Republicans alike, that of come out and given plenty of legal argument on why she is; wrong. My job here is to protect the voters in the state of Maine, and what she is doing just shows absolute contempt for the everyday American. They feel like we are not smart enough to think for ourselves, that she; needs to pull somebody off of the ballot, because we are not smart enough to know whether we should vote for that person or not. That is just flat-out wrong."; Sanchez: "I don't think it's a question of intelligence -there is a legal argument to be made. It doesn't seem like you articulated the legal argument and the flaw that you see in her decision. Nevertheless, Joel, we're grateful to have you and get your perspective, thank you so much for being with us." | image tagged in blank,double long black template,interview | made w/ Imgflip meme maker

Show More

58 views, 1 upvote

People who are in the right don't need to poke Supreme Court Justices in the political indebtedness.

People who are in the right don't need to poke Supreme Court Justices in the political indebtedness. | “I think it should be a slam dunk in the Supreme Court. I have faith in them. People like Kavanaugh, who the president fought for, who the president went through hell to get into place. He’ll step up, those people will step up. Not because they’re pro-Trump, but because they’re pro-law, because they’re pro-fairness. And the law on this is very clear.”; -Alina Habba dog whistling into the megaphone of the media, potentially committing a felony in the nation's headlights, intimating that Dear Leader's appointees will rule in his favor, forgetting that there is no law on; this matter which doesn't favor Dear Leader's accusers, that the lack of precedent is the whole reason any of this is happening, that the burden of proof is on the accuser and two courts have already; found the evidence presented supporting accusations Dear Leader engaged in insurrection preponderous, that Dear Leader's lawyers failed to refute the evidence twice already, assuming that when said evidence is; presented again along with the reasoning behind both lower courts' findings that it'll no longer be convincing. Although she's not wrong about one thing: Dear Leader's appointees have ruled against him before in; favor of the law and there's a strong likelihood they will indeed step up -just not in the way she apparently thinks. | image tagged in blank,corruption | made w/ Imgflip meme maker

45 views