Man Holding Cardboard Sign

If you go on line and look up the Nazi Party Platform of 1928 (or any year the Nazi party was in existence) and read that platform there are many parts of it that sound just like the Democrat Party platform. This is not new. I first heard about this 20 years ago so I looked it up online and it was true.

The DSA is infesting the Democrat Party because they don't think the party is moving fast enough but that does not mean that the Democrat party hasn't moving to the socialist left starting over a century ago.

This is why in Russia, the party of Voldmir Zelenskyy, is called “The Nazi Party.” Because the core definition of the party (which is just like the DSA) is exactly the same as the Nazi Party.

That also explains why the Democrats are so interested in giving Zelenskyy billions of our tax dollars. They're supporting the Nazis. The American Nazi party were exclusively Democrats since the beginning. Then I think the Democrats must have made some kind of a deal with them and they started joining the Republican party. Democrats immediately pointed that out as "proof" that Republicans were all racists. It proved nothing. The American Nazi party still has everything in common with the Democrat party that they always have.

Zelenskyy is a Jew. He is fighting against Russian Nazis.

The American Nazi Party was exclusively German in the beginning.
But obviously there is an overlap with the American Nazi Party and Republicans today, so at least you got that right.

That would be just like nazis to fight each other.

The Democrats told them to join the Republican party as a part of the Democrats plan to infiltrate the Republican party and try to destroy them from withing. It is why a lot of Republicans call some Republican politicians "RINOS". The Dems made some deal with the American Nazis and the KKK. I don't know what it was with the nazis but the Southern Poverty Law Center was financing the KKK. They even bought their uniforms and crosses.

And just in case you don't know (but I am very sure you do know) the Southern Poverty Law Center is a very left-wing organization. Their entire raison d'etre is to label the Republicans as racists. And just to make sure that the KKK didn't fall apart the SPLC entirely funded their operation. Because if you don't have any racists to point at then how will your non-profit turn a profit? No one wants to lose their race-baiting job even if it has become obsolete.

What a nifty idea. Why don't you post them both so everybody can make a comparison for comparative purposes.

I'll wait

What? You mean Communism and Socialism?

They won’t. And when they do, they will describe Capitalists as Communists and Communists as Capitalists.

They always do, because as soon as you hear them say “you don’t even know what Socialism and Communism are.” It means that they don’t know. If they knew, they’d just come out and explain it.

Let your alt answer for hisself.
You don't make the ignorance any less resoundingly ignorant sounding by tag teaming on it

Hisself is grammatically incorrect.

https://jewishvirtuallibrary.org/platform-of-the-national-socialist-german-workers-rsquo-party

The Program of the German Workers’ Party is a program for our time.

The leadership rejects the establishment of new aims after those set out in the Program have been achieved, for the sole purpose of making it possible for the Party to continue to exist as the result of the artificially stimulated dissatisfaction of the masses.

1. We demand the uniting of all Germans within one Greater Germany, on the basis of the right to self-determination of nations.

2. We demand equal rights for the German people (Volk) with respect to other nations, and the annulment of the peace treaty of Versailles and St. Germain.

3. We demand land and soil (Colonies) to feed our People and settle our excess population.

4. Only Nationals (Volksgenossen) can be Citizens of the State. Only persons of German blood can be Nationals, regardless of religious affiliation. No Jew can therefore be a German National.

5. Any person who is not a Citizen will be able to live in Germany only as a guest and must be subject to legislation for Aliens.

6. Only a Citizen is entitled to decide the leadership and laws of the State. We therefore demand that only Citizens may hold public office, regardless of whether it is a national, state or local office.

We oppose the corrupting parliamentary custom of making party considerations, and not character and ability, the criterion for appointments to official positions.

7. We demand that the State make it its duty to provide opportunities of employment first of all for its own Citizens. If it is not possible to maintain the entire population of the State, then foreign nationals (non-Citizens) are to be expelled from the Reich.

8. Any further immigration of non-Germans is to be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans who entered Germany after August 2, 1914, be forced to leave the Reich without delay.

9. All German Citizens must have equal rights and duties.

10. It must be the first duty of every Citizen to carry out intellectual or physical work. Individual activity must not be harmful to the public interest and must be pursued within the framework of the community and for the general good.

We therefore demand:

11. The abolition of all income obtained without labor or effort.

Breaking the Servitude of Interest.

I don't get it, you said it was supposed to be similarities to the Democratic party platform, but you posted a platform that is strikingly similar to Trump's, down to the point that that's basically the basis of much of what he stands for, and his Reich Wing cult as well.

This reminds me the time that you were supposedly trying to do the same in regards to slavery in the South and came out with the admission that you have 2 lines on your matrilineal side that were slave owners, or the time about government socialist jobs and came out with how your father's job was as a contractor laying roadways for government.

Like I said just a few days ago, it's almost as if you were daring anyone to bust you on being some sort of double agent in effect.

#11 "The abolition of all income obtained without labor or effort."

Gavin Newsom and Zohran Mamdani "We need to impose a tax on billionaires" Why? Because small handful of billionaires got that way by luck more than drive. Most of them worked their butts off to earn every penny of that money but no socialist has ever considered that. They just think they all came across that money without doing anything.

Obama said, "You didn't earn that" and then went on to say that if it wasn't for everything the government did for you you would not have anything.

#9 "All German Citizens must have equal rights and duties"

In opposition to "all men are created equal". There is a massive difference "born equal" and equality. "Born equal", among other things was a slap in King George's face. No one is born a monarch. But more importantly everyone starts off at the same starting line but not everyone will win the race.

Socialists, like Hitler, is trying to tell everyone that they all have a right to win that race.

But did you also see "duty". You are all going to win that race and you will only win it for Hitler. Socialism's "duty" is to the ruling class.

"Breaking the servitude of interest". Just like every other socialist who hate capitalism, Hitler just did not understand that lending people money must come with some incentive for the lender otherwise why lend money. If I had a bunch of money and someone came to me, who I never met, and asked me for money to buy a house, what reason would I have to say yes unless I charged interest.

Perhaps Hitler was trying to make the other socialist promise of free housing. Yeah, that always works. Socialists take everyone's houses and then assign where people live. I make be able to stay in my house but if I have extra rooms then people I don't even know might be given those rooms rent free and there is nothing you can do about it.

And that is just two of the Nazi promises.

BTW this is just one of the Nazi party platforms and it isn't the first one I read. The first one was much more like the Democrat party. Some places all you had to do was replace "German" with "American" and it would identical to the Democrat party platform. That other platform is in a book I read about 20 years ago. It was called "Liberal Fascism" by Jonah Goldberg. You should find that book and read it. He has sources on every bit of information in his book, unlike leftist history revisionists.

So out of your list of 25 from the Nazi platform that are supposed to be identical to the current Democratic Party platform, you found one entire single item that you're contorting to apply to a suggested added tax on billionaires in one single city,

And another one of which there's no resemblance to anything to any Democrat has said but is very much a part of Trump's stated "nationalistism" platform - a word he made a great big deal about asking what was wrong with it a few years ago.

Like I said, you're just pulling everybody's leg trying to see if anybody will bust you on it, and so far I'm the only one that has.

Thanks for the list by the way, I'm going to be using that one on the crew you're pretending to be a part of,,,

Just skimming from the top let me respond by saying I just picked those items and when I saw how much I had written I stopped there. I'm not the same AdamSmithsInvisibleHand or DementiaJoeHasGottaGo or KnightWhoSaidNI or AbbeyNormal (not to be confused with AbbyNormal who is not me and I have not seen him around in a long time). I'm just not feeling like typing as much as I used to.

Especially now, getting to know you, I just kind of feel foolish that I used to spend so much energy trying to teach you when you had no interest in that at all. You just want to mess around with people's heads.

Anyway, if I ever feel energetic enough, I will post the other Nazi party platform for you. The one I found was just the first one I came across on the internet and I didn't even read it. They put out a party platform every year because Hitler got elected. Each year it changed a little.

If you ever feel like looking it up then when you find the one that sounds a lot like you then that is when you'll need to ask yourself if you want to be a Nazi or if you want freedom. If you want freedom then you really should consider leaving the People's Republic of New Yorkistan while you can. Before sharia law is enforced. I mean, yeah, you can convert to Islam if you want. Parts of the religion is really good but then other parts - which supersede the good parts - are not good at all. Just remember, Muslims don't take to kindly to atheists.

"Obama said, "You didn't earn that" and then went on to say that if it wasn't for everything the government did for you you would not have anything."

I just caught this now as I had only skimmed through the top before.
No, Obama did not say that. Nor he did he go on to say the rest of your fanfic.

Uh oh. You're rig..... you're righ.........you're r.... ah crap! You're right. There! You made me say it. Are you happy now?

He said "You didn't build that". And all of his lame rationale as to why you didn't build anything was before he said "you didn't build that".

Please don't watch this YouTube video. What ever you do don't watch it. Please don't watch it. I'm warning you. Do not watch this. You need to use every bit of strength you have to not watch this video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GjqdP6KSOE

12. In view of the tremendous sacrifices in property and blood demanded of the nation by every war, personal gain from the war must be termed a crime against the nation. We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits.

13. We demand the nationalization of all enterprises (already) converted into corporations (trusts).

14. We demand profit-sharing in large enterprises.

15. We demand the large-scale development of old-age pension schemes.

16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a sound middle class; the immediate communalization of the large department stores, which are to be leased at low rates to small tradesmen. We demand the most careful consideration for the owners of small businesses in orders placed by national, state, or community authorities.

17. We demand land reform in accordance with our national needs and a law for expropriation without compensation of land for public purposes. Abolition of ground rent and prevention of all speculation in land.

18. We demand ruthless battle against those who harm the common good by their activities. Persons committing base crimes against the People, usurers, profiteers, etc., are to be punished by death without regard to religion or race.

19. We demand the replacement of Roman Law, which serves a materialistic World Order, by German Law.

20. In order to make higher education – and thereby entry into leading positions – available to every able and industrious German, the State must provide a thorough restructuring of our entire public educational system. The courses of study at all educational institutions are to be adjusted to meet the requirements of practical life. Understanding of the concept of the State must be achieved through the schools (teaching of civics) at the earliest age at which it can be grasped. We demand the education at the public expense of specially gifted children of poor parents, without regard to the latters’ position or occupation.

21. The State must raise the level of national health by means of mother-and-child care, the banning of juvenile labor, achievements of physical fitness through legislation for compulsory gymnastics and sports, and maximum support for all organizations providing physical training for young people.

22. We demand the abolition of hireling troops and the creation of a national army.

23. We demand laws to fight against deliberate political lies and their dissemination by the press. In order to make it possible to create a German press, we demand:

a) all editors and editorial employees of newspapers appearing in the German language must be German by race;

b) non-German newspapers require express permission from the State for their publication. They may not be printed in the German language;

c) any financial participation in a German newspaper or influence on such a paper is to be forbidden by law to non-Germans and the penalty for any breach of this law will be the closing of the newspaper in question, as well as the immediate expulsion from the Reich of the non-Germans involved.

Newspapers which violate the public interest are to be banned. We demand laws against trends in art and literature which have a destructive effect on our national life, and the suppression of performances that offend against the above requirements.

24. We demand freedom for all religious denominations, provided that they do not endanger the existence of the State or offend the concepts of decency and morality of the Germanic race.

The Party as such stands for positive Christianity, without associating itself with any particular denomination. It fights against the Jewish-materialistic spirit within and around us, and is convinced that a permanent revival of our nation can be achieved only from within, on the basis of: Public Interest before Private Interest.

25. To carry out all the above we demand: the creation of a strong central authority in the Reich. Unquestioned authority by the political central Parliament over the entire Reich and over its organizations in general. The establishment of trade and professional organizations to enforce the Reich basic laws in the individual states.

The Party leadership promises to take an uncompromising stand, at the cost of their own lives if need be, on the enforcement of the above points.

Munich, Germany

February 24, 1920.

acutally it was the National Socialist German Workers' Party, so by the usual "socialists are nazis" logic, not only are all socialists nazis, but also all nationalists, all germans, and anyone with a job

It was the “National” Socialist Workers Party. The “National” was added to the name the same way the Democratic Socialists added “of America” to their name, when it went from being a small local party, to a Nationwide political party.

And, actually, the Nazis got some of their biggest numbers of supporters from unemployed people, by holding rallies in bars, where they provided free beer. Very similar to the way the DSA has positioned itself with free money for illegal aliens and all the fraudulent social welfare programs that hand out money for voting blocks.

It was the “National” Socialist Workers Party. The “National” was added to the name the same way the Democratic Socialists added “of America” to their name, when it went from being a small local party to a National political party.

Just because you call yourself something, or somebody else calls you something, doesn't necessarily make it so.
There are people around who constantly call Donald Trump the "greatest President ever". And we all know that just ain't so.

In Russia, they call the Communist party led by Voldmir Zolenskyy in Ukraine “The Nazi Party”

And just like Hitler, Zolenskyy banned Communism. Even though he is a Communist. The reason they ban Communism, is so they can say they are Socialists.

In Iran, the Islamists joined forces with the Communists to overthrow the Shah... Then they killed the Communists... Sure sounds like what's happening in the dem party now...

Well find. But if you're going to call yourself a socialist and you have no clue what true socialist is then perhaps you might want to stop calling yourself a socialist. That would be just like running around calling yourself a Nazi. But then Nazis were socialists.

Why is it just so difficult to understand how wonderful, unique and free our country was set up to be. We the freest country to have ever been formed. Why would you want to change from that to a socialist? Socialism is slavery.

The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution should be something to be amazed and held sacred. Read the writings of the founding fathers. Don't just automatically dismiss them as "rich white slave owners" without knowing who they were. Most of them were not rich. All of the signers of the Declaration of Independence fully believe that they would be executed. Not all of them were slave owners. Most of them weren't. Most of them were opposed to slavery, even George Washington and Thomas Jefferson. They would have freed their slaves but it was against Virginia state law to free your slaves.

All of the ones I have read anything about are far better, smarter and more honest men than any presidents we have had in my lifetime and I'm 68. But if you do take that journey keep in mind that you will be at odds with the Democrat Party and any of the socialists. The most important rights we have are life, liberty and property. Socialism tramps on all of our rights. It always has and always will. The individual is expendable.

Ironic, as you just admitted a few hours ago and yesterday as well that you have no idea what Socialism is, other than your imaginary notion strictly for propaganda purposes that it's just an alternate spelling for Communism, which itself you have no idea what that means either.

Of course those who have slave owning ancestors have no problems with people who were slave owners, other than using that as a cudgel against Democrats before going back to their man cave/den and saluting the Confederate flag they have hanging there on the wall above the television.

The distinction is in name only as they both have the government control the means of production in the name of the people, its just that on does it in the name of the individual and the other does it in the name of the collective. Both are just systems that you get people to buy into so they don't rebel.
The only real systems that work are ones where you pit greed and dust for power against each other, like the US where there are three coequal branches of government with checks and balances on each other.

Socialists allow limited private ownership. To the cartel that is connected to the government.

Yep, just like the Fascists.

Socialism is Communism.

The only difference is that instead of complete government ownership. Like the British Crown had in colonial times. Socialists permit limited private ownership.

To cartels of people directly tied to the Government. That’s the only difference. And it is not a major difference.

Because even Communist Monarchy Dictatorships permitted the Noble class to live as though they owned property.

You are the one who doesn’t know what Socialism or Communism is.

And I’m talking about the Colonialist Communists, like England here—because I have never seen a person make a post like yours, who knew that the British colonial Crown was a Communist Dictatorship.

You fools, who are completely uninformed call colonial Communists “Capitalists.”

Because YOU don’t know the difference.

And you will call Communists capitalists, because YOU don’t know what Socialism, Communism and Capitalism even are.

tl;dr

No, Socialism is not Communism.

See if you can follow: Socialism is Socialism, and Communism is Communism. Hence why they are different words. They're not being used so they can confuse the more ignorant. They are not alternate spellings of each other. This isn't, "You say tomato, I say potato, but we both mean to say, tohmatoe."

And in neither does the state own everything. The state is the public. That's the whole point of both of them, society is in control of means of production, and in the other, the community is in control of means of production and ownership.

Hope this clarifies things

The difference is inconsequential.

Both socialism and communism aim to reduce economic inequality and replace capitalism with public control of production.
Socialism is a transitional economic system where people are paid based on their work, whereas communism is a stateless, classless society where goods are given based on need.

The variation or gap between the two political economic systems is too small, minor to matter. It has no real effect on the outcome.

bs;dr

I specified the alleged differences. Which are minimal. You haven’t stated anything.

No, you hadn't, you said they were the same thing, well, except for the difference in spelling

You can always tell a Trumpet, but you can't tell him much. 😜

You can always tell a communist. They tell you nothing and call it much.

When did you stop beating your wife?

Interesting how you would ask something like that.

No need to explain why, the reason is pretty obvious.

No please. Let me explain in the following essay....

Well you see. It all begins like this.....

tl:dw

When did you stop beating yourself?

Hey BedfordGuy are you Modda?

As were all Imperialist Monarchies. Which were Communist Dictatorships. They were Communist because only the Crown could own property. They were dictatorships, because there were no rights to vote.

That is spectacular, you even go further than the standard script. Socialists are imperial hereditary monarchies. Gosh, that's impressive.

Yes. That’s why the British wore the “Red Coat” — because they were COMMUNISTS.