Yes, he went on to explain the wording allowed abuse and that an alternative worded version would have been better. Please try again, this time with facts, logic, and reason.
“I have a very, very radical view on this, but I can defend it, and I’ve thought about it. We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the mid-1960s.”
“The courts have been really weak on this. Federal courts just yield to the Civil Rights Act as if it’s the actual American Constitution.”
He described the law as “a way to re-found the country” and “a way to get rid of the First Amendment.”
He called it the source of a “permanent DEI-type bureaucracy.”
In direct context of the student’s Title IX complaint: “[The student] got kicked out of school under a Title IX complaint, using the Civil Rights Act, that we as conservatives worship… The federal government was coming after students’ free speech using the mid-1960s Civil Rights Act that was passed with good intentions as now a permanent diversity, equity and inclusion-type bureaucracy.”
