Will this convince a jury of weaponization of a vehicle?
Yes it will.
Not that it matters this will not come to a court. The internal commission will see the video, see a cop infront of a car that tries to speed at him. And him reacted in selfdefense in a splitsecond.
Nancy Pelosi issued him his orders before the event -- that SHE encouraged to happen -- even started. But unless he is faced with prison time he will never admit that . . . and so far he has been amply rewarded by the leftist system for committing murder on her behalf.
Shortly after shooting Babbitt at 2:44 p.m. on Jan. 6, Byrd made a false broadcast on Capitol Police radio claiming that he was taking gunfire and was preparing to return fire.
Yes, and if not for the interference of Nancy Pelosi -- or other powerful leftists -- behind the scenes he would have have been properly investigated and held accountable. Everyone honest knows this.
Which is when the officer makes an arrest and NOT shoot to murder. Even leftists should know that much. Actually they do since their professional agitators use that legal caveat all the time to advance their agenda -- after notifying the leftist loyal media outlets.
LET'S DISCUSS LEFTIST POLITICAL PROPAGANDA:; POLITICAL PROPAGANDA IS OFTEN A MIX OF SOME SPRINKLES OF TRUTH INTERSPACED WITH EITHER DELIBERATE MISINTERPRETATIONS OR OUTRIGHT LIES. FOR INSTANCE:; "WAS HE IN MORTAL DANGER? NO."; BUT IN REALITY A FEDERAL AGENT GETTING STUCK BY A 3,000 POUND VEHICLE IS IN MORTAL DANGER. "WAS SHE STEERING TOWARD OR AWAY FROM HIM AS HE WAS BUMPED TO THE SIDE?"; MORE SURFACING VIDEOS SHOW THAT SHE DIRECTLY AND DELIBERATELY STEERED INTO HIM AS SHE ACCELERATED TO EVADE ARREST; AND THAT IT WAS NO 'GENTLE BUMP'. IF YOU WANT TO AVOID THE 'MISINFORMATION' EMBEDDED IN LEFTIST PROPAGANDA JUST PERFORM INDEPENDENT RESEARCH AND UTILIZE COMMON SENSE.
