According to you. You're the one making up the bogus claim.
Must be a mistranslation issue. You also have had the same confusion when it came to the comparison of crime rates between states, as well as with with federal spending. Despite both being thoroughly explained to you multiple times, you didn't seem to quite understand the meaning of per capita and instead insisted on citing total tallies.
So yes, New York City is going to have higher sheer crime numbers than Charlotte, North Carolina, but it has far more people living in it. In fact New York City has a larger population then do 39 states. Not cities within those states, but the entire state. 39 of them. So of course it's going to have higher crime numbers. Of course it's going to have more federal spending on it. But per capita, as in number per 100,000, the rates actually rank lower.