Muslim free zone

This is bananas

Yet our Air Force bases are welcoming Muslim nations to fly fighter jets over us. a8ru4d.jpg (click to show)

You keep saying that, yet isn’t the complete truth. Why is that?

Its a long story.. but here's some more...
"The nation of Qatar has historically been a funder of terrorism at a very high level". - Donald Trump 2017

So what happened since that? Qatar bribed Trump wifh a new Air Force 1. Anything else? Why would Trump even accept a Presidential plane from a nation that supports terrorists like Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood? The USA is doing that bad they can't afford a new airplane?

Or maybe they changed since then and realized funding terrorists is maximum self harm?

Israel bombed Qatar's capital on September 9, 2025 targeting a residential compound housing senior Hamas leaders. So no.

Considering it's one of the most violent and repressive religions on the planet, I don't blame ya.

Off the US taxpayer dime. Bribing Trump family billions ( golf course, Luxury jet) works wonders

Dude, that's so off topic that you're starting to sound like Hasan Piker whenever he deflects and starts blaming Israel on all that's wrong in the world.

No, it's completely relevant. It's only ever off topic when it challenges your maga narrative. Want proof? Read what Trump maga favorite, Laura Loomer, posted on the subject.

Wow, you are projecting so hard right now that you could be hired in a cinema.

Every accusation from maga? is a confession. Projection is what Trump and maga do.

Btw? Is Laura Loomer projecting also?
Next, you'll be saying Loomer was is a liberal.

Wow, the projecting is so strong that you believe we're projecting onto you. That's next level dedication!

...You do know that the First Crusade was done in response to centuries of Muslim aggression, right? Christians literally learned the concept of a Holy War from their much more violent younger sibling.

That would require the independent study of history to have learned that; and clearly this is not the case with Christianity haters. Upvoted.

That is true. While Christianity's certainly not bloodless, no culture or religion is. The fundamental difference is that Christian bloodshed is either caused by crazies using the religion as an excuse to commit atrocities (see the Salem Witch Trials), or in more understandable circumstances where taking the blade was the only option (see the First Crusade, which was done to both fight back against and free Christians from violent Muslim expansion).

Yes . . . completely accurate.

Why are you calling it Christian? Call it what it is: Catholic.

Catholics and Protestants are both Christians, they're just different streams of the religion. Granted, I personally agree more with Protestant values than those of the Catholics, but that's just me.

No, the Catholic Church says you aren't saved unless you take an long class get baptized and only go to Catholic Church. The Bible says you are saved if you believe in Jesus.
The Catholic Church of history was a political force that used the threat of excommunication (basically saying you are going to hell, despite what the Bible says) to control rulers and kingdom's. They were not Christian.

Ah, I see what you mean. By my own definition, they're the crazies that ignore the teachings of Jesus to shield themselves from their own deeds.

Exactly. There may be some Christians that attend Catholic Church but the church is not Christian.

The Salem witch trials as well as all the witch trials in Europe were because people took the Bible at face value and did exactly what it said, which is to kill witches. You're trying to make it sound like they distorted the words.

And If the crusades were done as a response to Muslim aggression, why did so many Catholic soldiers also commit atrocities?

They interpreted the words. Some would say correctly interpreted them.

And Islam was attacking Christian’s countries and Christian’s incessantly since its rise in the Middle East to the present day slaughter in Africa of Christians.

Like I said before, Christianity's not bloodless, but that's mostly because of either self defense or crazies using the religion as a shield. But even then, they were simply not following the central message of peace and love that Christianity was originally founded on. An example would be KKK members who say God hates black people, despite the fact that the mainstream agrees that God loves all people.

And it should be noted that, up until relatively recently in human history, war was FAR more atrocious than it is today. Terms like "war crime" simply didn't exist back then, and the thinking was relatively simple. These people want to kill you and your family, so it's okay to kill them first. Yes, Christians did that, but they were FAR from the only ones. Hell, considering that up until the First Crusade their faith was spread mostly by the word (as opposed to Islam, which mostly spread by the blade), they were pretty friendly in comparison.

The first crusade started in 1096. Christians had been spreading through violence long before that

In 782, Charlemagne decreed that any Saxon who refused to be baptized should be put to death

Islam has a long history of violence. Christians do too

Which I kept saying they did. But, again, the difference lies in their central figures and how close they follow their teachings. Jesus was the kind of person who'd rather die by torture than let harm come upon his enemies, while Mohamed was both a warlord and a pedo. Violent Christians ignore the teachings of Jesus while saying they do, while violent Muslims actually DO follow Mohamed's teachings.

And before you say anything about the pedo thing being more normal back then, even then 9 year olds were considered a tad too young.

I just find it odd how people think it's okay to attack Christianity (which, for the most part, has moved away from its more violent past), while at the same time thinking Islam is perfect and any criticism of it is automatically discriminatory (despite the fact that, in pretty much every Muslim ruled nation, violence and extremism is considered the norm).

312 AD, to be exact, as per the instructions of Constantine when he was told by God to conquer all with the cross.

712lei.jpg (click to show)

Boy did he misinterpret that one. 😅

Random dragon was there too

Random dragon?

Upper right hand corner

Oh, I see.................................................... now

Crusades? Try 312 AD.

A bit of a head start, there, eh? Doing the exact same thing to what later became the Islamic lands, namely, forcing Christianity by force on all in their path. Remember, what we call the Middle East and North Africa plus Southern Europe were THE Europe, the Roman Empire, ages before the people of the northern hinterlands were ever discovered. That land was all the original Christendom. All of it. And it was all done by force.

Yet you talking about Islam doing the exact same thing in the name of the same exact God somehow didn't ring any bells about their own origins, which, in case no bells were ringing again, was Christianity. If it wasn't for Christianity, there never would have been Islam.

But still, does three centuries ahead explain how Christianity has in 2,000 years killed more people on planet Earth than all other religions, ideologies, countries, peoples, ethnicities, races, continents, you name it... Combined? COMBINED?

Granted, Harry President Harry S Truman put an end to that endless massacre fest when he decided to domesticate the rest of the planet after it lost WWII to America. But just because Christians stopped the wholesale slaughter of the rest of humanity a whopping half a century ago doesn't mean it never happened. It happened. And there are still quite a lot of people alive today who were alive then when it was happening.

Killed more people than all others combined. Christianity. Combined. Combined.

Better look up Hinduism. It is violent and oppressive- not like the Americanized delusion.

Ahh, so that justifies the English genociding hundreds of millions of them (there's even claim that it's over a billion)? For spices. Spices. The country with the most bland food on the planet killed hundreds of millions for spices that they didn't even use. I don't know, maybe they sold them to Spain and Portugal for culinary purposes?

The Great Bengal Famine of 1770 witnessed the death of 10 million people - 1/3 of the population of Bengal - because of a salt tax. A salt tax. A tax on salt. 10 million people. Dead. Salt. Tax.

Father, Gun, and Unholy Roast. Praze Jayzuz and pass the coriander.

Nope, that wasn't Christianity that was various kings approved of by Catholics.
True Christianity following Christian values only kills in self defense.

No True Scotsman....

Were the Dutch, Germans and British also Catholics during their colonial expansions? How many millions - millions - died just so that the Dutch and the Brits can get spices for the most bland food on Earth? Millions. (Some even estimate that the British killed over a billion in India, but there's no way of verifying this, and most suggest lower, just in the hundreds of millions) I have no idea what they did with all those spices, sell it to the Spanish and the Portuguese? They massacred people, started wars. For spices. Spices. Oh, and Jesus. The Jesus part made it okay.

Nope. Christianity has standards and rules. If you don't follow them you aren't Christian.
Exactly my point. Christianity says only fight in self defense, they did not and the Catholic Church endorsed it. It wasn't just once either. Like a mistake that they learned from. It was repeated for 100s of years. They were by definition not Christian.

No True Scotsman rides again.

All religions have standards and rules. That's what makes them religions. And they just so happen to be the same exact standards and rules that every other religion on the planet has, give or take a nickname for the Gods and potential culinary exemptions from some of their dietary guidelines.

That doesn't mean that the adherents adhere to them. If they did, there would be no need for the concept of sin. No the spectre of a bearded old man in the sky menacingly threatening eternal punishment for whatever deviation from said standards and rules.

Christianity is a religion that has been commonly criticized by others in particular because it teaches that all you got to do is say a prayer, maybe repeat it a few times, perhaps throw in a little extra pocket change into the collection basket, and you get to sin again for the rest of the week. It is the most secular of all religions, with little connection to anything religious, other than Sunday mass, and that consists of trying not to fall asleep from sheer boredom at their seat.

Propaganda by the modern left. Blaming the British for famines that occurred regularly prior to any contact with the British. They did not kill billions or even millions. That’s ridiculous propaganda to blame them for all the deaths in India once they entered the picture.

Yeah, that's right, 10 million dead - 1/3 of Bengal - because of a tax on salt was a fairly regular occurrence.

So was half of Iran in 2017 to 2019. They didn't starve to death because their food was hauled away by the Brits, the Brits hauled the food away after farmers died of starvation staring at their food for the larfs.

In three centuries of occupying, the Brits didn't harm a single hair on an Indian head, nor anybody else's.

Good grief.

What does Iran have to do with your claim of billions killed in India? Nothing because your claim is false and wildly exaggerated propaganda.

That's your claim, no mine.

If you're going to hop into a comment chain, at least know what you're addressing when you pretend to address it.

Both your claims blame the British for famine deaths. Famines which happened periodically before the British came. As a matter of fact in India they stopped happening in the 1920’s due to British administration. Then came back after independence in some areas.

Atheists have killed hundreds of millions of people rivaling any and all religious killers.

no

Yes

Atheism is the human default. Correlation is not causation, especially in this case.

Ya not just some people who never pondered religion. The active hate and oersecution persecution of religion is as much a religion as any other. Mao, Stalin, and Hitler were all atheists.

You like making things up, don't you? Many atheists grew up in religious households, including me. I'm willing to bet I've put more time, effort, money, and thought into religion than you ever will. Pondering religion has led me to the conclusion that it is false.

Atheism was not their reason for killing. Religious fanatics, however, do use religion to justify murder.

Stalin was actually in a seminary when he was younger. He was going to become a priest

And yet he didn’t become a priest. He became a religion hating communist atheist.

It doesn’t matter how they grew up or under what doctrine. It’s what beliefs they professed at the time of their atrocities. I could care less what twisted their mind but the truth is religion haters murdered millions and you can’t change that fact no matter how much you don’t like it.

Typical leftist portraying violence fantasies because he lost the Plot. Pointing out that atheists murdered hundreds of millions isn’t denying religious violence but it apparently is your trigger.

No, they were not all atheists, nor was anything any did mandated by atheism or done in the name of

Yes they were all anti religion atheists.

Pffft, I thought it was Judaism Adolph? Oh yeah Islamists hate both.

What