Political violence is okay sometimes?

Three more than you buddy, who got downvoted so much you got your comment hidden.

Oh no....my weekend is ruined!!!

Just pointing out something you libs hate: Facts.

At the time, Nancy had the authority to accept or deny it. Authority which she's, rightfully, lost.

And as the president...he has all of the power to act and ask for forgiveness afterward...you know...how he does things now.....keep excusing it as we all know it wouldnt look good to tell a group of militants to go fight ike hell then call the cops on them....lmao!!!

Trump didn't have the same kind of political power back then as he does now, simple as that. Plus, back during his first term, he was naive enough to believe he could trust Democrats to run the country alongside him. Clearly, he's learned from that mistake.

Yes yes of course. Great explanation. Glad you felt the need to continue to explain...as if you were losing!

Just trying to clarify a few things, as you came off as someone who simply didn't understand. Or rather, someone who doesn't WANT to understand things that go against whatever narrative the Dems told you to believe.

Here is the thing...MAGA is the party of ALTERNATE TRUTHS. You and i do not see the the same thing.....i read.....not social media....real documents. What you claim is not reality.

Here...you will deny the fact...

No, the Speaker of the House cannot unilaterally deny the National Guard in the Capitol. The Speaker does not have authority over the National Guard or ultimate responsibility for Capitol security. That authority lies with other officials and entities.
Who controls the D.C. National Guard?

Unlike the National Guard in states, which are under the control of their respective governors, the District of Columbia National Guard is always under the command of the President.

So...tell me how i do not understand......

You know what's funny, you try to have a "gotcha" moment with me about this one thing, but refuse to even mention the 200+ FBI agents agitating the crowd, or that the only people who died were some of the rioters, or that the people condemning Jan 6 also cheered on BLM.

So you agree MAGA are aheep and blindly follow if you claim the FBI actively stirring the pot to make it far worse.

That's the exact opposite of what I said. If MAGA are the kind of blind followers you believe they are, then they'd have stopped the MOMENT Trump tweeted not to cause a riot.

If anything, it's the Dems who are the blind sheep, as the higher ups in the senate tend to say shit like "harass them wherever they go" when talking about ANY Republican. And considering ANTIFA and BLM (the latter of which was, objectively, worse than Jan 6th ever was), it seems like you locos just burn anything your masters say you should.

The law doesnt care if there are 200 fbi members present. It is what it is. It doesnt matter who is present.

Your daddy didnt want to call the cops on his boys!!!!

Soooo, do those FBI agents just go free, despite the fact they were actively making things worse?

Also, pretty rich that a lefty says the law doesn't care about something when lefties tend to riot when illegal migrants get sent back home because the law doesn't allow them to live in the US without going through the proper channels.

Leftist?

Nope. Conservativeibertarian. Stay the f**k off my shit...i paid my taxes.

January 6th wasnt for yours or my covil liberties. They were fighting for a loser claiming he won when he didnt!!!

Onve again you have strayed from the fact that Trump could have called them in regardless of who was there and he didnt. Because once again.....it was his goons!!!!

Yet, he ACTIVELY tweeted before and during the event NOT to cause harm. If these people were his goons, as you "everyone I don't like is Hitler" people say they were, it would've been a lot more peaceful. Even with those FBI agents actively stirring the pot to make it far worse.