According to the left the riots on Jan 6th was worse than 9/11. The same people are claiming the riots on ICE are no big deal.

You failed to understand. Most rich people are dems, the ones doing the criminal actions and colluding with corporations.

This is true. The liberal elites surround their castles with moats of the poor people they oppress, for their own amusement and financial gain.

We can only hope and pray, that at this point in time, most of them know it.

I believe that’s really the case, because there weren’t any African AMERICANS rioting along side the foreign criminals in LA.

A lot going on in that meme, where to start?

Herbert. Everything begins and ends with Herbert.

Who do you think she voted for 🤣

https://x.com/i/status/1932891380118139347

Excuse me I don't want you stuffing words in my mouth
9/11 was a terrorist attack, and January 6th was a riot

9/11 lost nearly 3000 Americans
And Jan 6th lost one person directly and a few indirectly

You can call me triggered because I am when someone says bull like that

Stop generalizing for the love of all that is holy

You didn't even say the radical left you just said the left

Dems have been all over the news saying Jan 6th was a terrorist attack and an insurrection. When in reality it was some minor vandalism and a free tour.

I know jsn 6th was t a terrorist attack it was a violent riot and attempted insurrection

Free tour IF: your athletic enough to climb through a window

I honestly don't know if we can keep brining up Jan 6th like, Iys the equivalent of: it gets old

Brining it up over and over has made it kinda useless, I'm not saying we should ignore what happened but using it in every argument isn't gonna help

You must have missed the footage of the capital police letting them in and them walking between the velvet ropes and touring the building, the leaving.

??? Even if said footage does exist

Assuming it does

Not everyone got in peacefully

And I'm not saying every one got in violently, I kinda am but I am saying definitely not all of them got in peacefully

See https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=ibWJO02nNsY

If you don't watch the full video

TIMESTAMPS are posted a few seconds before (at least tried to) so you can see the entire thing and not accidentally skip it

0:35 breaking in through window

1:34 police attempting to hold them back

2:00 man uses police shield to smash window

2:16 same footage from 0:35 but you see one man start to climb through window

3:00 rioters begin perusing a lone Capitol police officer

6:27 Alert issued due to rioters

6:34 A mob of rioters crush the police (it really looks like a crowd crush gonna start)

6:47 A lone officer fights, trying to keep an entrance to rotunda closed but it overpowered

7:37 (at the time) Speaker Nancy Pelosi's suite breached and her staff hides under a table in the conference room, they request police

8:00 rioters gather at house chamber entrance, one person says "Well, we came this far, what do you say?" one person responds "Drag 'em out!" then the first person says "Hang 'em out!"

9:04 a group of people chant "we want trump!" as the video shows a request for assistance announced over police radio requesting "due to a breech to the capitol"
continuing from radio request rioters are at house floor entrance and law enforcement officers have drawn firearms and aimed at the doors of the house floor

11:30 Rep. Daniel Kildee (D-Mich.) talks "I called my wife. As soon as I heard her voice, I realized, oh man, you know, am I having that call? You know, when the plane's going down or the building's on fire, is this that call?"

12:18 Ashli Babbit shot

at this point im just showing you it wasnt all peacful, honestly

after doing more searching i have found that,

It is important to understand that the overwhelming majority of law enforcement officers at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, were actively trying to prevent the protesters from entering and engaging with rioters, often in violent clashes.

However, there were a few documented instances where officers' actions were questioned, including:

(gotta make a new comment for text limit)

It is important to understand that the overwhelming majority of law enforcement officers at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, were actively trying to prevent the protesters from entering and engaging with rioters, often in violent clashes.

However, there were a few documented instances where officers' actions were questioned, including:

Officers escorting rioters: Some videos show officers escorting rioters inside the building.

Officers opening barricades: In one video, USCP officers can be seen opening barricades, allowing the mob to enter the Capitol complex without resistance.

Claims of being "let in": A number of individuals arrested for their role in the January 6th events claimed they believed they were free to enter the Capitol because they were not stopped or told they were not allowed to be there. Some even claimed officers "ushered them in".

It is crucial to note that:

These isolated incidents do not represent the actions of the majority of officers who were attempting to defend the Capitol.

The Capitol Police actively investigated these instances and disciplined officers for "conduct unbecoming" or other policy violations.

No evidence has publicly emerged of any officer explicitly inviting rioters into the Capitol.

The overall picture of the January 6th events is one of law enforcement attempting to hold back an overwhelming and violent mob.

These may include mistakes btw (so do your own research)

You aren't taking into account that most of the people starting the violent actions were FBI agitators undercover in the crowd. The fact Pelosi refused Trumps offer to call in the national guard. Antifa dressed in red hats and black clothes agitatingthe crowd and stirring up violence. You could tell the difference because the red hats didn't say MAGA on them.
I think the video you are referring to is highly edited as the Jan 6th committee destroyed a lot of the evidence. Police were seen firing tear gas and smoke grenades into a nonviolent crowd.

well.. The D.C. National Guard reports to the president.

if Antifa was making the crowd angry the crowd would still be responsible for thier own actions, was tear gas fired? absolutely, i aint debating that

Unfounded Theory on FBI Informants. A no-evidence claim is the idea that “unindicted co-conspirators” mentioned in federal indictments related to the Capitol riot are undercover FBI agents or informants, as conservative outlets have claimed or suggested. Legal experts and federal case law say that government agents and informants cannot be labeled conspirators to a crime.

During his June 15 Fox News show, for example, host Tucker Carlson, referencing a story from a conservative website, first said “potentially” and “almost certainly” FBI agents were involved, and then definitively declared that “FBI operatives were organizing the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6.” Republicans in Congress have pushed the unfounded theory as well, including Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Matt Gaetz.

Federal case law from the 1985 case United States v. Rodriguez acknowledged that “government agents and informers cannot be conspirators.”

on the national guard

On the day of the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, the first National Guard members arrived to assist at about 5:40 p.m. By then, most of the violence had subsided.

In the critical minutes before rioters had breached the Capitol building around 2 p.m., the chief of the U.S. Capitol Police force and the mayor of Washington, D.C., put out urgent requests for guard backup. But it took more than an hour to get formal approval for their deployment, and then nearly three more hours for the first guard reinforcements to arrive.

The D.C. National Guard reports to the president.

In a recorded video the following day, President Donald Trump claimed that he “immediately deployed the National Guard and federal law enforcement to secure the building and expel the intruders.” But Trump’s claim that he acted quickly is contradicted by news reports citing unnamed sources who say the president initially resisted efforts to bring in the National Guard at the outset of the Capitol riot.

https://www.factcheck.org/2022/01/factchecking-claims-about-the-jan-6-capitol-riot/
https://www.factcheck.org/2021/01/timeline-of-national-guard-deployment-to-capitol/

Blaming Pelosi. Over the summer, House Republicans tried to shift blame for the breach of the Capitol to Speaker Nancy Pelosi, saying she was “ultimately responsible for the breakdown of security.” But we found their arguments overstated the role of the House speaker in overseeing security of the Capitol and relied on speculation.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy suggested, without evidence, that prior to Jan. 6, 2021, Pelosi played a role in denying a request to use National Guard members at the Capitol that day. (Trump also pushed this idea in a Jan. 4 statement this year.) Rep. Rodney Davis pointed to the fact that on the afternoon of Jan. 6, the House sergeant at arms sought Pelosi’s permission to bring in the National Guard as evidence that Pelosi was “calling the shots on all of their actions.” A Pelosi aide confirmed the request was made but said the speaker “expects security professionals to make security decisions” and that she only expects “to be briefed about those decisions.” The request also went to then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and while both Pelosi and McConnell OK’d bringing in the Guard, the Department of Defense still needed to approve the move.

Look up the laws. Pelosi or the mayor of DC had to approve the order, neither did, despite the obvious risks.

The FBI were directly asked how many agents they had present on Jan 6th. They refused to comment.
Doesn't matter to me if they can't be tried. If they riled the crowd up then any damage is in them.
Kinda like the whitmer kidnapping where all but one guy was an undercover agent.
Its known as entrapment. It's also illegal. Ray epps.

13:23 is definitely where it is violent

Domestic terrorism at best. I don't consider it a terrorist attack though

No, no one said that

I will stress this the President DOESNT have power to call in National Guard so Trump shouldn't have the Governor is what calls them in.

If Trump really wants California gone .... Maybe it's time for a succession if that's what he wants.

Yes, the president can call on the national guard. It's right there in the constitution "commander in chief".
The question is can he use them to quell a riot, and the answer to that is yes, if they attack federal employees like ICE agents.

If it's an attack keyword.

Throwing bricks at federal law enforcement qualifies.

although not even once have i actually seen it called peaceful when i saw the riot videos, i may have before but since i saw the first videos of riot not once have i seen it referred to as peaceful besides in the memes

Its referring to the reporter in this meme.

Nah that's actually crazy, someone hada have some kind of stroke while making the headline

Like: protests, some turn violent

Would be a slightly better headline, but mostly peaceful what the helllllllll

This is an actual screenshot of CNN.

i believed it was, i didn't even think it was fake, although it is real i assume, besides its easy to verify authenticity so one second

ok for some reason it took a second to find

but yea is real

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klVhCkhOTRQ

i didnt assume it was fake btw

Was this inspired?

so we agree that Jan 6th was an insurrection?