Whose Body?

Who inherits the Placenta?
A Shared organ structure created by both mother & fetus together in a shared creation upon conception.
The mother expels it upon birth.

Although Many mammalian mothers consume the Placenta for healthy lactation
and added nutrients, and immune system protection expelled in the Collostrum, the initial milk.

Babys do not look like that when most abortions are preformed

I would expect better from a fellow scribe

But that's what they will look like if not aborted.

You obviously don't understand medical history books and the pickle jar situation of stages of fetal development. Most of these medical depicted diagrams are of failed pregnancy, and in this situation the mother and baby were donated to science to get this imaging because both didn't survive, or it was made via AI.

Have you heard of ultrasound? Google "ultrasound images of fetus at various stages of development"

But we're talking about the photo in this meme. Ultrasound takes a picture using sound waves and cannot grasp such a photo from a pregnant woman being dicected for medical educational purposes. It is and was the biggest medical donation made in history for medical scholars when the first glimpse of a fetus in utro inside a deceased woman happened. The ultimate educational facts of life is that both life forms did not make it, but the education survived. And I find it very ironic that only lifers use these materials to educate only life's existence, when the images protraied of these fetus are actually already deceased. That's why most billboards have been switched to images of 6 week old babies instead of educational medical imaging of dead fetuses... It really in my only atnomoy life reality, the irony of the situation.

Are color photos of late-term fetuses real?
Google's AI answer: Yes, color photos of late-term fetuses can be real, especially those captured through advanced imaging techniques like ultrasound or advanced surgical techniques. Lennart Nilsson's work, a pioneer in prenatal photography, demonstrated the possibility of capturing detailed color images of fetuses at various stages of development.
Explanation:
Lennart Nilsson's work:
Nilsson used a combination of scientific imaging techniques, including electron microscopy, endoscopy, ultrasound, and macrophotography, to create his iconic images.
Ultrasound:
This imaging technique uses sound waves to create real-time images of the fetus, allowing doctors to visualize the baby in its amniotic sac.
Advanced Surgical Techniques:
In rare and controlled situations, advanced surgical procedures might provide access to capturing images, though this is not typical.
In summary, color photos of late-term fetuses can be real and have been achieved through various imaging and photographic methods, including ultrasound and advanced surgical techniques.

They aren't saying they aren't real, they're saying they aren't ultra sound

Also, google Ai answer says to put glue on pizza to have it sick more

This was done on December 20th last year of my most recent nephew: about four months along. This is not an AI generated image but an original. So, yes, a color photo can be made today.

But it's also not a photo with a arial view of the mothers flesh in blood holding a fetus inside the reproductive system as a whole. I see no reds pinks, diameter and thickness or a uterus sliced in half in this picture. Thank God for that. Plus posting images of your unborn nephew hopefully was done with permission from his host. The unborn deserve privacy to. ... Just take the woman deserves privacy in her healthcare journey.

But that's not using sound, is it

Can’t say for sure since I wasn’t there.

Ok

What does that have to do when anything

That has colour tough, ultrasound images don't have colour

"Yes, color photos of late-term fetuses can be real, especially those captured through advanced imaging techniques like ultrasound"-Quoted from scribe1969 displayed just above your comment

Lol pictures of abortions... I thought abortions ment the fetus was detached and removed from the hosts reproductive organs. If the images or something was from abortion that means it was removed. Medically speaking it's known as a dilation and curettage (D&C) procedure, nobody only pro life refers to the procedure in such a way because I guess the word abortion strikes a more emotional time to the fetus that's removed. I don't understand why pro lifers are so interested in pictures of medical procedures, and medical literature. Not their fetus, not their body, not their medical complications, not their doctor, not their problem, not their business.

We're all in this together.
Via being Products of Conception (PofC)
It takes a Village.

When the woman doesn't want to live like the village then what? The village makes her comply with orders to have a pregnancy? What if the woman villager is a drug addict or alcoholic in her 2nd trimester, and the doctor finds drugs or alcohol poisoning in her fetal imaging, will the village be willing to accept that child, raise that child, and support it through life? Will the village make the mentally ill woman endure a pregnancy while on black box warned medications and force a pregnancy when pharmicutal prescriptions risk the pregnancy? Will the village force a woman who doesn't have insurance and lives in a car or is homeless who wants a abortion that ability? Will the village stop a doctor from performing life saving abortions by making laws that go against their oath? Because a village in different states have, and now they are dealing with complications from restricted abortion access.

They often do just that

Why the heck am I even arguing about this, I'm out of this argument

Most.

Correct.

Most means that there are some who DO look like that. And even if they do not look EXACTLY like that, they will if left alone.

44% off abortions are preformed less than 6 weeks into pregnancy

That means more than half of abortions take place after the six-week mark. You’re not helping your case, but rather making mine and the OP cases for us.

93.5% off all abortions are performed before 13 weeks, that means over 9 out of 10 abortions are preformed before feti develope a spine

How long will it take you to grow one , if you decided to develop the kid longer in the bun oven ?

End of the first trimester, so 13 weeks

So, that makes it ok to just rip it out of the one environment it is meant to develop in? By this 13 week period you arbitrarily claim all the major organs are formed, and will shortly begin functioning independent of the mother. Regardless of that, they already have their own unique dna system, so it’s not her body that is being treated, but a distinct body being murdered. Just as a plant that is growing in the earth is alive, even though it may not yet resemble the tree or the beanstalk, or the turnip that it ultimately becomes, the human child developing is alive.

Feti only obtain control of their bodily functions by 12 weeks. In 2022, 92.8% of abortions are preformed before that mark. Out of 1000 abortions, 7w are preformed after feti control their bodily functions.

I meant 72

You didn’t answer any of my arguments, just doubled down on your claims. Just because they can’t survive on their own yet, or aren’t fully developed doesn’t mean that they aren’t alive and aren’t human.

Would you consider a skinless, spineless, hairless thing with a stomach tube being the only way it can eat, that literally has to be inside someone to have any chance at being considered a living creature to be alive

PBMemes asked:

PeanutbutterMemes0 ups, 2h
Would you consider a skinless, spineless, hairless thing with a stomach tube being the only way it can eat, that literally has to be inside someone to have any chance at being considered a living creature to be alive

My answer: YES!!!

Again, just because it cannot yet survive on its own, outside a specific environment, does not mean it is not alive. By the logic presented in the question, a premature baby in an incubator could be said to be not technically “alive” because it is fed through a tube and can’t survive outside the incubator until it gets stronger.

Plants are thinned out all the time so they don't choak out and kill the main plant.

People aren’t plants

If a doctor is performing the procedure for any reason accepted by the woman, I don't see why it's any of your concern.

I consider life to be sacred. Then too with WEF and other globalist powers, as well as socialized medicines being pressed for, it will eventually come to pass that it won’t be by the woman’s choice. Instead a court will order it done without her consent. We have already seen this happen in the UK.

If your afraid of the government ordering or restricting abortion and value life I suggest you support women and doctors by petitioning your government to stop bans on access to abortion. I support the life of a woman firstly, and if it is the will and power of the unknown for that woman to carry a pregnancy to term than so be it, if it is the will of the unknown to work through a doctor to end a pregnancy for any reason necessary than so be it.

I don’t see where it’s your concern that people believe the unborn have a right to life

Yeah Thais what i meant

They're basically forbidden jelly beans

The value of a human life is not based on what we look like. Thats evil.

I know, I'm pointing out that it is presenting misinformation.

A picture of a baby in utero is not "presenting misinformation" in the same way that a picture of Old Faithful at Yellowstone National Park is not "presenting misinformation". They're pictures.

It's implying that all feti look like that when aborted

Not all feti look like that when aborted, but all aborted feti were babies that should have been able to get to the point of looking like that. So honestly, I don't really care if it's misleading in this way. It's point is greater than its error.

Ok