Book Bans

Did imgflip get finally tired of your n*zi memes?

Lil' bud doesn't get the meaning of this. The Bible is made to teach about sexual immorality and what sex is honoring God. Erotic books are very different. The sole purpose for erotic, sexual book is to arouse the user rather then educate.

And people who haven't read those books in their full context have an uninformed and therefore meaningless opinion of their content. They should therefore be ridiculed and subsequently ignored, not catered to for being ignorant, loutish bullies.

The irony is you yourself miss the wider cultural context that much of the "sexual content" Christians want to ban also isn't intended to be pornographic in nature.

I believe NONE of the "sexual content" Christians want to ban from school libraries is pornographic in nature. I also believe that not including the bible among publications containing non-pornographic sexual content is hypocritical. I.e. par for the course when it comes to Christians. Another reason they should be ridiculed and then ignored.

He speaks the truth

They didn't say porn, they said "sexual content".

Often the things Christians themselves try to get banned also fall under the category of non-pornographic sexual content.

Didn't say porn bud, I said erotica.

Focusing on the wrong part, the point is that a lot of the books & materials targeted for bans are also intended to educate rather than arouse.

The OP is comparing things in that same category of non-erotic sexual content.

Bro fr they do?

In fact in some cases the banned books were trying to convey Christian beliefs about sex but other Christians only saw certain portions out of context and treated it as erotic, exactly as you accuse OP of doing with the bible

Idk anything about these banned books, but if you'd read them, I'd like to know what's in them if you want my opinion on it.

The book bans like to focus on all LGBTQ+ content. I think if something is an erotic novel, it shouldn't be allowed in school, straight or gay. However, if the book's sole purpose is to educate people about LGBTQ+, it shouldn't be banned.

Information about LGBTQ+ is not necessarily sexual content. If a book has a straight marriage, there's nothing wrong with a gay marriage in a book.

The bible also has several rape, incest, and fetish-related verses. Why should 2nd graders be allowed to read about these things but not a gay couple?

I agree, LGBTQ+ stuff should be banned, ruining our culture.

There's children's Bibles bud, appropriate content for their age.

This country was founded upon God's word, so no LGBTQ+ culture should water that down.

Why should LGBTQ+ stuff be banned? Are you going to refuse the fact that gay people exist? Inclusion is not ruining our culture, discrimination is.

So they should use "edited" and "censored" bibles? If you have to make an entirely new book to read to kids, then there might be something wrong with it in the first place.

The funny thing is, the Constitution doesn't even mention god. Also, many Christians believe there should be separation of church and state (since Jesus literally commanded it by saying, "give to caesar what is caesar's and give to god what is god's")

Funny how these so called "pro America" Christians are the biggest freedom haters out there

Honestly.

They hate anyone who is different than them.

They come into an atheist stream and complain when people don't agree with them.

That's the thing about you people, so freaking annoying. Like, where does bro pull all this crap out of?

No, I know these people exist obviously. And honestly, if they're somewhat normal, I can get along with them. But if they're yelling on rooftops about their rubbish, or flirting with me, I cannot.

No, it's not an entirely nea book, bud. It's just with the stuff they shouldn't know about at that young of an age taken out.

Bro, wtf is your deal? If you read any bit of US history that isn't liberal censored, you'll see that they're all or almost all Christians. And they talk about God a lot. And how do you think thay a nation this young could rise to be the most powerful in a period of a few centuries?

No idea what bro is talking about with that tbh.

"Somewhat normal?" If someone wants to flirt, they're legally allowed to because America has something called the First Amendment. You can ignore them. Also, the fact that you think ANYONE would hit on you is hilarious.

Shouldn't know about it? Why not? They will when they're older according to you.

Read the Constitution. There's no mention of god.

Responding to your last comment since I can't reply to it directly:

Buddy, nobody is flirting with you.

Yes, you can ignore someone if they're blushing and looking at you.

Nobody is going after a smelly incel who posts pictures of underaged anime girls as a "ratio"

You said the bible should be censored until children are older. Also, the fact that you're in High School is absolutely insane. I thought people grew out of their slavaboo phase in 7th grade.

I never said there wasn't anything else. I only mentioned the Constitution because it was relevant.

Ngl, bro was.

Bro waved to me like 20 times. I never had an interest in bro. I thought bro was a girl until I talked to "their" mom. 💀💀💀

Yeah people flirt with me unfortunately. I don't like any of them tbh. 💀😭

I don't get the meaning ratio slang ngl. Maybe bro would be nice enough to explain. 💀

Wtf does bro think I'm an incel?

Apparently a lot of people go after them tbh. 💀💀💀 (such as yourself.)

Yeah fr, like it is now, kids shouldn't know what sex is that young.

Slavaboo phase? Bro wtf is that? Idk anyone but Slavs were into their culture.

Yeah but you forgot to mention all the other things. Quotes and all, our national anthem. 😎

Once again responding to your latest comment since you keep replying to everything I say.

Someone waving at you is not flirting. You probably think a girl smiling at you means she wants sex. Get a grip on reality.

You fit the exact definition of incel. If you don't know what something is, there's this great invention called "google" that you can use to find out.

You've admitted you're from the US. You aren't slavic and being 5% doesn't count. You've never been anywhere outside the US.

I only mentioned the Constitution because it was the only relevant thing. Also, in case you didn't know, we have the right to choose what religion we want to be part of. We can also be atheists if we want to.

There's a difference between educational sexual content and entertaining sexual content tho

Yeah. And it's apparently determined by how loudly people complain. Funny how the people screaming for books to be banned have read maybe one paragraph from the books. I'd speculate that they're only ok with sexual exploitation and violence in books they've read, but I doubt many of those people have actually read the bible either.

They shouldn't be accepting any of it... and we don't want anything innapropriate in books no matter how small. It poisons people. Anything innapropriate could start and addiction, or a lust... the way people complain about something isn't as important as what they're complaining about. We need to use the moral laws the Bible gave us to determine everything

Like the morals in the comments here?
imgflip.com/i/9hrwru

Sum it up pls x_x

Translation: *plugs ears* "lalalalalala"
You can lead a moron to knowledge but you can't make them think.

I like that saying a lot
Why am I the one who's thinking and presenting proof and you're the one throwing insults like a 4th grader who learned a new roast on youtube

You have presented zero proof. And the burden of proof is on YOU. It's a logical fallacy to shift it onto me. YOU'RE the one saying existence can't be eternal but gawd can. You're the one saying the bible teaches truth and science is wrong. My job is to call you a retard for believing that shit, because believing in make-believe at the expense of reality is retarded. And you've obviously ignored everything I've said about believe what you want, and science never claimed to have all the answers. You're either selectively filtering that out, or you are in fact an actual retard. I'd speculate a troll but you're too sincere in how baffled you are.

And instead of READING THE COMMENTS I linked to, you deflected. Well if me calling you a retard makes you right, then congratulations on being right. I. Do. Not.Give. A. F**k. About. What. You. Think.

You may not believe in God, but you definitely see yourself as a higher being 😂
I DIDNT say existence couldn't be eternal. In heaven I, and hopefully you too, will have new bodies that don't corrupt, don't die. They're e t e r n a l.
I DIDNT say science is wrong, I know it better than you. God created the freakin universe. He made science. He constructed everything on an intricate way that random cosmic gas couldn't.
If your only job is swearing like crazy and calling me retarded without presenting ANY proof, how can you call yourself an atheist? You have no idea why you believe what you believe. You're just arrogant about the fact that there's a God who demands you give up your sinful lifestyle. You don't know your stuff at ALL

I see myself as having a more defensible position, and taking pot-shots is the most useful course of action I can take against a person so painfully closed-minded that they can't even acknowledge what is being said to them. So keep patting yourself on the back for refusing to allow outside information to penetrate your meter-thick skull and I'll keep laughing my ass off at what a pathetic sob you are.

An atheist is someone who doesn't believe in god. There is no need to explain why I DON'T believe something. If there is, why don't you believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster? What evidence do you have that it doesn't exist?

If the universe had a beginning, it cannot be eternal. Eternal means having no beginning nor end. So you're saying the universe had a beginning but that it didn't have a beginning. That's f**king retarded.

Your arrogant ass claims to know science yet claims something that had no beginning, had a beginning. That's completely non self-aware, and f**king retarded.

"God created the universe" isn't evidence. It's a conclusion, built on a foundation that doesn't exist. And "God created science" isn't evidence, it's logically incoherent drivel. Science is not an invention, it is a discovery. A scientifically minded person would recognize and understand this, so congratulations for cutting the floor out from under yourself again.

You commented at length on this meme imgflip.com/i/9gtiru without even reading it. I'll go ahead and spoon feed your infantile mind the gist, which you will plug your ears to like you do with anything that conflicts with your presently held views: scientists created conditions in a laboratory that demonstrate how organic compounds form from inorganic compounds through processes that occur naturally over hundreds of millions of years. Lot of big words there, science genius. Better grab your dictionary. https://phys.org/news/2009-09-scientists-hypothesis-life.html
This shit is old news. Like older than your parents. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller%E2%80%93Urey_experiment

Ok, you ignored that. What a shocker. On to shred your next feculent assertion. Oh wait, you didn't have one. Well what can be expected from someone so daft they don't know how to click on a link. You're a waste of my time, so if I can't enjoy the process of shitting down your worthless neck then then my presence here is even more pointless than yours.

Ok the universe is INFINITE, not eternal. God's eternal tho
Also, evidence doesn't exist for any spaghetti monsters. None at all. There you go
Now... Where did this early earth atmosphere come from? Where's the beginning
Scientists are always going to change what they think about how the universe formed. They already changed the date of the earth several times, and I don't expect them to stick with something. They can't explain how matter is made without a god

Get a life. If you're going to stalk, at least reply with something smart. You've been sending 20+ replies per day for 5 days now.