The left hate the good ole days

And Republican idiots drove Chevy Novas.

Democrats: The Pinto of the Political world.

Yeah, there's nothing wrong with the Chevy Nova.

I suppose you'd prefer the Yugo?

Bro who said things aren't normal....?

We have a republican TV gameshow host who's catchphrase was "you're fired".. who got fired (for racist comments).. who was on tape talking about grabbing women by the p*ssy... who became president anyway with "America First" rhetoric... who cheated on his wife with a porn star... who is now a convicted felon selling "God Bless the USA" bibles made in China... who almost got assassinated... by a republican... who chose a guy who once called him "America's Hitler" to be his VP... and dude might actually win again.

Ain't nothin' weird about that. Things are completely normal.
😜

That's it, let it all out man, unburden yourself it feels better. Reminds me of when i was supporting Pat Buchanan back in 96 and that idiot Perot had to siphon enough votes to hand it to Clinton for a 2nd time no one wanted to hear what a bobblehead vote thief he was.

Pat Buchanan?

He lost the nomination to dole perot was just his usual hemmorhoidal self

But you said:

"Reminds me of when i was supporting Pat Buchanan back in 96 and that idiot Perot had to siphon enough votes to hand it to Clinton for a 2nd time"

Making it sound like Buchanan was a candidate and the election.

Plus it was more Perot siphoning votes off of GHW Bush in 92.
In 96, he was less of a factor. Clinton was simply even more popular with his groupie base and glowing economic news. Sadly, Dole didn't have much of a chance.

Another distinct diff between left and right, leftists are literalists and cant accept nuance.

Yeah, I myself can certainly dig the nuance when it comes to someone not knowing who was the Republican candidate in 1992 and that Perot was a fizzling has-been-that-never-was in 1996 and that Clinton was ginormously popular. His base reminded somewhat of Trump's, although with Billy it was more groupies willing to make excuses no matter what than cult hellbent on bringing fascism to America as if that would be the solution to a lifetime's worth of poor choices.

OK, OK, so I SHOULD have said "back when I was supporting Buchanan who lost out to Dole in the primary who lost to Clinton in the election because of the hemorrhoid Perot. I supported Buchanan in '96, Clinton eventually won because of Perot.

naah, "nuance" so much more captured what you did say regarding Buchanan for prez '96 losing to Perot.

FUN FACT: Every single Trump supporter I've encountered here has said that they were never Republicans nor voted for one.
They're telling the truth.

I voted:
Bush '88
Bush '92
Dole '96
and I am literally the only one on this entire site who did.

Foreigners vote in US elections? Obviously not.

"nuance" - it makes for an appropriate cover.

So you're one of the "hard core" republicans who are never Trumpers like Liz or Dick Cheney? I think it's great multitudes of people are waking up to the fact that establishment republicans are just democrat light, they're both headed the same direction but dems want to ram rod the leftist agenda up America's ass and let our own blood be the lubrication wheras the RINO's suggest some sort of lube to make it a bit easier on the masses, so then the debate becomes Vaseline vs. Canola oil, which is better for the enviroment in the long term, with the "news" releasing "polls" saying the American people just LOVE the direction the country is headed.

PRO TIP: When you improvise a bogus narrative to substitute for my posts, I won't even bother reading it.

'Nuance' is for your erroneous statements about your alleged voting records for candidates that weren't.

Me? I deal in reality. Allows me to sidestep having to create excuses for errors because I have made none to cover for in the first place.

Good one modda. Are you trying to confuse low info dem voters?

Well at least they didn't try to pull this^ in 96

"Deeply concerning" would be one way to put it... another might be "election interference"... or "buying votes". I guess if this is found to be illegal, and Trump wins, there is no way Elon does not get pardoned.

What if at some point in the future it gets so insane that they look back to THIS time period and think....... "Remember when things were normal?"
🤯

Looks like lefty's gonna pull out the lawfare after the impending Trump victory because they're the ones that can't accept results of elections. I was sure there'd be those same accusations against Trump by now for handing out free food the other day. You guys haven't started a McDonald's-gate investigation yet? Oh, that's right, you don't control the house right now (and thank God for that).

"they're the ones that can't accept results"

4 years of "muh fraudDdDd" disagrees.

Also if the point of "lawfare" is to prevent trump from winning, wtf would the point be in doing it AFTER he wins? As I said he will most likely just pardon Elon... and anyone else in his circle.

8 years*

Trump claims to have won the popular vote in 2016 as well.

True. The fact that he lost the popular vote is unfavorable to him... therefore it was also labeled "fake news".

The perpetual victim...

Because they want to hobble him on day one (lawfare after he wins) and because he cant run again theyll be calling him a lame duck on day one and hoping that will stick as well.

So which lawsuits are designed for that? And was trump's own legal strategy of delay delay delay actually part of democrats diabolical "lawfare" plans or how does that work?

Lame duck...? Considering all the possible descriptions of trump (liable rapist, bullsh*tter in cognitive decline, etc ) "lame duck" seems pretty generous.

Yes, its good for you to get your election day trump victory meltdown over with beforehand although im betting any number of mobs are forming and planning now, getting the signs made, bullhorns charged up scheduling time off work......scratch that, lefty mob members dont have jobs. But this will all be because THEY wont accept the results of the election meanwhile that rapist you spoke of, Bill Clinton, continues to walk free and that is a sad comment I agree.

I know, only republicans stage mob actions (cough cough) Ferguson (cough cough)

Do you require a link to your comment that that wasn't reply to?

But anyways, while you did it, you know what the problem with whataboutisms is? I mean aside from all that logical fallacy stuff? See, by going tit for tat, you're only proving that tit is just as bad as tat. You're not comparing it to Thanksgiving dinner for a reason.

You're kidding, right?
Trump not only couldn't accept the results, he wanted to stage a coup. More than once.

Maybe up there on the moral high ground, you could get Soros to somehow stop making what Musk does look like child's play?

Your last point is a good one, yolo.

With Dems in charge, it will get to that point.

Except, yolo, you made up most of that. Well, you regurgitated the lies from our formerly trusted media, because that's what the left does these days. Few on the left can think for themselves any more, so they just swallow whatever the media shoves down their throats. Those on the left who let that be done to them are the perfect example of low info voters.

Speaking of "low info"... Which specific parts of what I said were lies?

Okay, there's this:

""Deeply concerning" would be one way to put it... another might be "election interference"... or "buying votes". I guess if this is found to be illegal, and Trump wins, there is no way Elon does not get pardoned."

And I already said your last point was a good one, yolo.

??

When you said "you made up most of that..you regurgitated lies from the media" it was in response to a different comment.

But even if you let that slide...... Why does there seem to be completely different standards for the right and left?

Kamala Harris is allegedly "paying for people to go to rallies" because im not even sure what and "buying votes" because of tax policy that would possibly go into effect.... that would possibly benefit people at some point in the future ..... IF she even gets elected (which I have plently of doubt about).....

Meanwhile me saying that Elon MIGHT be "interfering with the election or buying votes" by literally handing out checks to people.......
that is "regurgitated lies from the media"? 🙄

You said my last point was good. Ok cool. Thanks. You want a cookie or what? 🍪
😂

You actually believe that, modda?

What lies won't you believe about Trump?

Yes, I do indeed hate Lynchings and racism.

Thanks to the democrats. . .interesting how just about every dark spot in US history is because of (D) the majority of the time.

Once again you're (deliberately) confusing a party with a region ruled by a certain ethnicity.

Lily-White Movement Republicans. Because Reconstruction didn't soon end without a reason.

Give it up, modda.

You simply cannot hide from the Democrat party's shameful history of racism.

That may have been normal in your racist state not mine.

49 dollars is expensive for gas...I'm so glad we have Biden right now 🙌

Stick with Biden in the form of Harris, and we will have $49 dollar gas, sooner than you'd expect.

Yeah, I really hated it when we had Trump and didn't have inflation and gas did not cost almost $6, like it does here in the SF Bay Area block of the Peoples' Republik of Taxifornia.