Everywhere Leftists hold power they spread violence and death

Hitler wasn't a leftist

Socialism is left, not right.

Actually a “right wing dictator” is an oxymoron as right wing is more individual in nature while leftism is collective

If Socialism is "left" and anything funded with tax dollars is Socialism, doesn't that make individuals recipient of, participant in Socialist programs Socialists?

Additionally, the U.S. collectively conducts national elections; if "leftism" is collective, does that not render everyone who participates in the electoral process a "leftist"? I mean... by the definitional guidelines you're establishing, wouldn't avoidance of "leftism" require elimination of suffrage, establishment of an autocracy/dictatorship?

By “collective” that indicates more government involvement in the affairs of the people. You’re trying to stretch the terms into things that nobody would ever consider, and if you keep scraping the bottom of the barrel like that you’ll get splinters under your fingernails.

No, I'm operating on what you said, words as they're defined.

collective
-adj.
1. denoting a number of persons or things considered as one group or whole
2. formed by collecting
3. of, relating to, or being a group of individuals; involving all members of a group as distinct from its individuals
4. marked by similarity among or with the members of a group

-noun
1. a collective body
2. a cooperative unit or organization
3. a helicopter control system governing lift

As far as trying to "stretch the terms into things that nobody would ever consider" is concerned, the only one arguing with the dictionary, trying to Humpty Dumpty the situation here is you. Nice projection, btw.

Ironic, "stretching" to encompass its on definition, as it is the collective of the people being the government that is its very definition.

why does it seem there is there always a modda reply following XiaoJia?

it just seems odd...

Might explain the column of notifs I'm getting from you.

"anything funded with tax dollars is Socialism"

Where was this stated?

You're kidding, right?

Is Socialism always in danger of running out of other people's money?

Hitler wasn't a Socialist either.

Neither were the rest of the dictators you pictured. The simple fact that they were dictators should be something of an ample clue in regards to that. Autocracy is the literal polar opposite of Socialism.

Maybe you should tell those who escaped from them that they weren’t “socialist” when it is literally part of their party name.

Ahh, so China, North Korea, and Iran are Republican?

You see how this works?

No. Maybe there's only one person who thinks they see how this works.