horse laugh

That "surprising" study was the Henry Ford Covid Task Force. You can read it here: https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)30534-8/fulltext

So, that study isn't a clinical trial that has to have controls and randomization. It was an observational study. And if you're like "why is that important" it's because an observational study is just that- observation. It doesn't take any precautions to exclude anything that might also impact the health of the patients.

Let me put it another way- an observational study finds that red cars get more speeding tickets and concludes that cops hate the color red.

Where a controlled study would find that cops ticket cars of all colors at the same rate but that people who have a history of speeding prefer to drive red cars.

So, an observational study can bring to light some interesting data but it takes a clinical trial to discover the truth.

HCQ, AKA, common, everyday, always available in the stores, simple tonic water.

No. This is a lie. HCQ isn't effective at treating covid. It never was. There are many scientific studies that show this.

Methinks thou doth protest too much

You need to re-connect with the really real world.

If it’s safe for horses and used extensively for people in Africa, then why was it condemned here?

It won a Nobel peace prize and was used extensively on humans in the US too.

True.
I took the early treatment - Ivermectin, HCQ, antibiotic, Zinc and Vit. D - when I had Covid. Not only am I still here, but I was 100% symptom free in three days. And I didn’t turn into a horse.

It wasn't condemned here. The people who swore up and down that an anti-parasite drug worked against a viral infection were wrong (obviously wrong) and were laughed at. Why were they laughed at? Because multiple clinical studies found that it didn't work. What science did find is that if you were invested with parasites, taking the drug did help you against covid- because it killed the parasites that weakened your immune system.

🐂 💩

Read this excellent piece:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41429-021-00491-6

In principle, a molecule can act as an antiviral drug if it “inhibits some stage of the virus replication cycle, without being too toxic to the body’s cells.” [20]

That is a good study.However, it's a study of studies. Meaning, they put together the data of several other studies and draw some conclusions. This is an insightful process that can bring to light trends or areas to focus on for clinical studies.

In their own abstract, they say " probable mechanisms of action". They offer no firm data or conclusions. They don't say that ivermectin works and this is maybe how it works.

What they are saying is "IF" it works, this is "PROBABLY" how it works.

They don't claim ivermectin works. Not once. They do claim that they have likely put together a means by how it might be working.

The equatorial rain forest countries in Africa with the highest usage of Ivermectin and HCQ have the lowest death rates of covid.

It wasn't because of the horse dewormer. It's because they took it seriously. They didn't have leadership that was tellilng people it wasn't real, that it would just go away "like a miracle."

Turns out when the leadership and the population take it seriously, fewer people die.

you can read more about it here. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-54418613

BBC fake news.... "The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has delivered a seismic decision that could reshape public health policy across the nation.

In a contentious case involving the Health Freedom Defense Fund and other plaintiffs versus the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), the court has declared that mRNA COVID-19 injections do not qualify as vaccines under traditional medical definitions."

I'm pretty confident that don't know what that decision is about (and why it's wrong).

The 2 judges felt that because the covid vaccine does not prevent someone from being infected and does not prevent them from then spreading the infection meant that it wasn't a vaccine.

This is deadass wrong because no vaccine ever, not even the smallpox vaccine, has offered that protection. With every vaccination, it is still possible to be infected and spread that infection to others. It's called a breakthrough case. It's why vaccines have efficacy ratings.

They testify it was not even tested to see if it stopped transmission. A brake breakaway case or breakthrough case is a rarity. It is not the norm as with these injections where it is the norm because it wasn’t even tested to see if it prevents transmission.

I'm gonna repeat this: no vaccine has prevented transmission once you are infected.

Not one. Ever.

I’ll repeat this hello they testified it was not even tested to see if it stopped transmission

considering covid is really. The word for a common cold, even though it was jacked up in a lab in China. it's still having 99.7 survival rate for people under 70. So why would anyone even take an injection if they have natural immunity? because it was sold to you. That's why this was the largest scam ever. done to the world and its medical genocide because no one is vaccinated. They are vaccine injured. I hear it has killed tens of millions. And I know of many people that took these experimental deadly injections. And they are fighting for their life.

3vcoc6.gif (click to show) (more horses laughing)

Thanks for continuously enforcing this upon america Don! Father of the vax..

Only the cowards and idiots took it.

Lots of people didnt want to lose their job so cowardly is a bit much. Lots of fearmongering too. What is clear is that many wouldnt have taken it if don strumpf didnt tell them to. And is still telling people to.

Fauci should’ve been in prison for the AIDS