Sexual abuser - proven in court. Fraudster - proven in court. Insurrectionist - indicted and awaiting trial for Jan 6 insurrection. Thief - indicted and awaiting trial for stealing classified documents.
It's like the so-called Moral Majority and their Televangelist lords back in the 80s that self destructed thanks to a fine assortment of Polaroids taking in seedy motels in New Orleans.
That plump raisin is withering even more. Will Botoxed Melania be this generation's Tammy Faye Baker?
You're the defendant: the witnesses against you are a porn star who has five times denied any sexual contact with you, the other is a convicted perjurer with a gigantic financial gain if you are convicted. Besides that, no one can tell you what you are specifically charged with. You'd be pretty sure of a not guilty verdict, wouldn't you? But the Prosecutor ran for office on the promise to "get you" and the Judge is handpicked by your enemies for the case. The Judge also has a daughter who stands to gain financially from your conviction. Then the Judge overrules all your lawyers objections, sustains all the prosecutors' objections, and won't allow your chief witness to testify at all. Suddenly you wouldn't feel so confident.
I first and foremost would stay awake in court. I would also keep my mouth shut....as instructed....so there is alot i woupd have done different if i were the defendant......
His actions in court were witnessed first hand by the jury....to solidify his attitude regarding how he thinks of himself in relation to the law of the land.
The jury was selected by the defence just as
it was the prosecution...the problem os the defense couldn't raose REASONABLE DOUBT!
Selecting a jury from a district that voted 90% for your opponent is a losing proposition to begin with, and you only have a few jurors you can deny. The defense couldn't raise reasonable doubt without knowing what they were charged with. A total hatchet job of a trial just so that can call Trump a felon until the inevitable overturned verdict
You understand how a jury is selected right? You do understand it was a jury of his peers....the same peers he said he could shoot and no one would care about?.
Why not argue for a change of venue...they did.....
The verdict was predictable due to the city the jury was drawn from, the assigned judge, the piles of charges, and the anti Trump sentiment. Perhaps some day you may be railroaded in a similar manner and your outlook will change.