DEI Does Not Believe in Diversity or Inclusion

You’re just mad because our free speech doesn’t align with your ideology nor narrative

You use your free speech without harassing others for exercising their free speech which includes the elemental right to silence.

No.

You have the right to remain silent yet you love to squander that faster than you bought a big tv with your covid stimulus check that was supposed to be used for rent and utilities..

😄

But since you are willing to talk without an attorney, what is "ambiguous" about their thoughts?

Viking and I think very similarly, so naturally he got it...regularfeller got it, Charles got it, Diogenes got it, BarrymyTaxGuy got it....cuz conservatives 'get it'!

Conservatism is a state of mind and not an identity crisis. We are all in the same club. We use our brains and not our emotions to interpret the world. We know who we are, we use facts & logic, we know the difference between right & wrong and good & evil.

Regularfeller, an Alpha male, took you to task and if you pay attention to his points, you will be way ahead of the game. DEI has been foisted upon companies and people who should know better but somehow do not. That pesky 'liberalism' shows up to destroy just about everything in its path. If you delve into this, you will find a whole lot of Marxism along the way (hint: Marxism 'BAD'). Start with the Black Lives Matter online site, for a real eye-opening experience.

I actually responded to your initial query, 959, but I erased it because it was so funny and so true that it would have gotten me put on restriction with the mod Gods AGAIN. We cannot be ourselves online because of, you know, censorship.

I am attaching a recent meme I made out of frustration at having NEVER received an answer to my question...and STILL have not gotten an answer! A conservative, aka "deleted", had an excellent response along w/ other good answers but no libs stepped up to the plate! Why? Cuz there is no systemic racism in America.
imgflip.com/i/8iplqt

imgflip.com/i/8iplqt

You lost me at “Alpha Male”. I’m going to take a leaf out of y’all’s book and say “There is no point in explaining because you would not understand”.

Ok, one of the biggest problems in our country is our current lack of Alpha males. We have dumbed down, sissified, compromised, delegitimized, disrespected and emasculated our men. I blame women for a lot of this confusion. When women started wearing the pants in the family, the men consequently picked up the panties (or, became women or some variation of it). Instead of 'believing' all women, we need to 'blame' a whole lot of 'em for becoming SJWs with more toxic femininity than men want.

Do I think strong men cannot cry? Absolutely NOT! Strong men have emotions however, men and women are different. Vive la différence! But, instead, today we advocate for the 'acceptance' of identity confusion & illusion! Adults actually claim to not know what a woman is and concoct new PC pronouns that useful idiots are forced to embrace (or else be considered 'sexist' or 'misogynist') and therefore in need of 'reeducation'. Clown world!

Free Americans are not told HOW TO THINK nor told what WE CAN & CANNOT SAY. We have strayed from the Constitution into a free for all (yet victim mentality) where our so-called 'leaders' are idiots at the helm of our Ideocracy.

I could go on but suffice to say that most Conservative men (like regularfeller) are just that...Alpha males raised with traditional values & ideals finding themselves in a world of confusion, lowered standards, upside down morality, unequal justice, crazy sexuality, open frigging borders, a National Debt headed towards infinity and idiots making decisions for We The People.

…this is parody, right? Because if so, you have quite the knack for it. I tip my hat to you, seriously, if so

You are just being coy.

Also not explaining what is "ambiguous" about their thoughts.

Is the reason I am not getting an answer because YOU are not a psychologist?

BINGO

Since you did not understand the meaning of the phrase, "you are just being coy", allow me to explain that I am of the mind that you fully understand Veebs' point.

I cannot explain it to you.

I am not a psychologist.

I am a psychiatrist.

So you want me to take the role of a silly clown? Gladly

I care not what role you take.

DEI is wrong despite the arguments you make.

DEI is by definition discrimination, demanding forced cooperation and further propagation.

DEI brings resentment and disruption and ultimately corruption, of diversity, equity, and inclusion by means of its ill conceived workplace intrusion seeking collusion in upsetting interpersonal harmony.

You can try to brute force your argument, but without evidence to back up your claims, they hit like a wet noodle

😄 if you say so.

Then do not apply for a job interpreting memes unless the company embraces DEI.

I thoroughly enjoy wasting my time on this site.

I have always had a love for comedy.

No, they aren’t qualified because they have a mental illness.

You hear that - You have been given one more chance!

😄

No.

DEI is insinuating that one is not qualified because one is not a caucasian male.

It is that they are not qualified.

If they were qualified they would be hired.

It is an attempt to coerce companies into doing to themselves what affirmative action did to them.

What "systems in place inherently put minority groups at a disadvantage"?

And you just said the quiet part out loud - minority groups. Caucasian people are excluded from diversity, equity, and inclusion.

That is as racially biased as affirmative action was.

“If they were qualified they would be hired.”
Didn’t I start this whole thread with this? And look, thanks to initiatives like DEI, these qualified people are being hired, otherwise they may have been overlooked.

You keep talking about how affirmative action murdered companies, but never have you shared any evidence of that to justify your point. So what companies have died directly because of affirmative action?

As for systems that inherently disadvantage minorities, look no further than the U.S. constitution, as well as our states. It took 19 amendments before universal suffrage was even guaranteed in the U.S., and it is disingenuous to think all its problems were fixed by those amendments. Heck, my own state’s constitution bans gay marriage, and the only reason that isn’t enforced is because of Obergefell.

Never did I say Caucasian people were excluded from diversity, equity, and inclusion. Heck, I’m white but DEI still covers me. And
if I were a man and straight, that wouldn’t mean DEI wouldn’t be out to get me, just give people less fortunate than I a chance for upward mobility

That's a lot of words. 🦜🦜

So here's a lot of words back at you.

You did not start this thread nor can I find any comment where you typed the words,
“If they were qualified they would be hired.”

Wow, I am getting a free history lesson on the constitution, Amendment 19 no less ! 😄

Your rhetoric on this is disingenuous as it does not having anything to do with the premise of DEI discrimination.

But, since you mentioned it, how many years ago was that ratified?

100 years ago +/- ?

And what, exactly, does the right to vote have to do with discrimination in hiring practices in accordance with DEI?

MURDERED COMPANIES:

Two things -

1) affirmative action was trashed because it harmed companies through equity hiring; meaning less knowledgeable, less talented, less capable people were required to be hired based on legalized and mandatory discrimination instead of more qualified, higher scoring, more talented, more capable people. That is fact.

2) you are feigning no understanding of metaphor.

I am unconcerned with the legal status of gay marriage.

I stated caucasians are excluded from DEI, because they are.

Behind the theory of DEI is the concept that caucasians have all of the top jobs and are given all of the opportunity and that minorities are to be given top jobs and opportunities they would not be given based on their knowledge and capability.

That harms companies by disenfranchising caucasian employees and undermines the status of minority employees that gained position by virtue of their qualifications.

I am not the one saying they are not smart enough, capable enough, talented enough, to get a high ranking position based on their merits. DEI (you?) is saying they cannot.

I have worked/visited/done business with very large companies/organizations, both public and private.

Other than parts of the country that have few minorities, they all have long been pretty diverse.

Why are minorities assumed to be less fortunate?

Every employee has the same "chance" of upward mobility every day by reporting to work, on time, and performing their duties in an exemplary manner.

Why should having mammary glands be considered in awarding opportunity?

“ You did not start this thread nor can I find any comment where you typed the words, “ “If they were qualified they would be hired.””

Check back at the first comment, Einstein, and you’ll find a sentence that is pretty much this. Maybe it’s not word-for-word, but I understand this because you seem to have it in your head that I am being coy with you.

That is all, since you hate long comments

And just like that you are suddenly a literalist. 😄

And the obligatory casting of aspersions begins!

Einstein 😄

Just trying to appease my audience

The strength of a company comes from the ability and talent of the staff regardless of their race, ethnicity, gender (male/female), sexual orientation, national origin, etc.

Tell me why caucasians are excluded from diversity and inclusion ideology?

They are not. That is a misconception brought by fear mongers and conspiracy theorists.

That being said, if a strength of a company comes from talent and not diversity, what’s so wrong about finding talent from areas unlike your own, especially when they may hold more talent and ability than anyone from your group, which you may never have found if you didn’t take initiative to look there?

It is not a misconception.

It is not fear mongering.

It is not conspiracy theory.

It is discrimination.

What you are describing with your repeated, "strength of company" statement is discrimination.

Say it is not 193 more times and I will say that it is 193 more times.

Quit telling minorities they aren't good enough to climb the ladder due to their own merits.

That is dehumanizing and racist if you ask me.

Go ahead, ask me.

No, I won’t. You already falsely assume I’m racist so why would you hear anything else I’d have to say?

Oh.

You take that back this instant! 😄

I never assumed you are racist.

That is not a broad enough term.

What I said is, and this by virtue of your statements, that I believe you to be an advocate of workplace discrimination.

Being said, do you not think others would react as you have to your false assumptions that they are racist simply because they do not agree with the ideology of your advocated social justice warrior project?

I do not advocate workplace discrimination. If that were the case, I’d be against DEI. You continue to misunderstand its purpose and instead try to brute force an argument that it promotes discrimination without any evidence or explanation

DEI IS WORKPLACE DISCRIMINATION!

😄 Why is that not sinking in to your consciousness?

Because DEI is not discrimination.

No it is not.

😄 Why is that not sinking in to your consciousness?

Because DEI is discrimination.