And all the extra oxygen wouldn't hurt politicians and climate scientists...

It's not... and they know it... that's why Gates recently said mass planting of trees is not science... So much for that lie... what it did prove is more trees cool the planet...

Al Gore Rhythm

LOL... and Gates also admitted their bullying tactics with climate change were not working...

Herding everyone into "smart cities" where they can be monitored 24/7 will NOT stop climate change. Nothing can stop climate change because you cannot stop what does not exist.

True Wisdom meme is supposed to point to AdamSmithsInvisibleHand comment

Thanks

That's for sure!

It's not naturally occurring CO2 causing the problem, it's the industrial operations pulling out nitrogen from the air along with everything else made in the atmosphere, to produce massive loads of chemicals that get sprayed onto the ground, which in return depeleats the soil causing it to respirate more CO2 in the air because of the chemical alteration to the ground, rendering the land dead. Another problem is packing hundreds of animals in one area, and the inability to process the crap into energy.

Crap into energy. Interesting. Back when dinosuars still roamed the earth, I did a high school science fair project converting hog waste from our farm into methane and nitrogen enriched fertilizer through a process called methane digestion. Recycling waste products before it became fashionable, hmmm. Read a great book by Dennis Hayes called "Rays of Hope" which laid out an excellent concept for the implementation of solar energy and decentralization of energy generation. You might be able to get a dusty copy on ebay if you want to see where science was before it was politicized. Strange, every methane digester that was built on city sewer plants in that era is gone now.
You realize that the atmosphere is 79% nitrogen right? 20% oxygen, 6/10ths % argon? CO2 is 4/10,000th % of the atmosphere. Does this make sense? Rain precipitates nitrogen, oxygen, CO2, and particulates out of the atmosphere, much of those gases are entrained into aquifers and are "emitted" simply by turning on your faucet (it's not just methane- which is less the 4/10,000th % of the atmosphere). Lightening is part of nature's fertilizer process, it fixes higher concentrations of nitrogen in rain drops which fall to naturally fertilize the entire planet.
Earth is hurtling through the most hostile environment in existence, space. In spite of this it is an unmatched haven for life. Science proves it has been warmer and colder in the past. There is no such thing as an "average temperature" of earth. If you "average" the highest and lowest recorded temperatures, the "average" is about zero degrees F. If you look at satellite data of CO2 levels, you'll see concentrations of CO2 in the 3000 ppm range downwind of rainforests and jungles, and less than 50ppm at the poles. There is no "average" of CO2 at 400 ppm, because CO2 is not uniformly distributed in the atmosphere. The atmosphere is not laminar, it is turbulent, that is an important factor. In fact, look up atmospheric temperatures- layers above us vary in temperature- nothing is uniform, you can't look at one snapshot and project the climate of earth.

Yes I know about the atmosphere and water cycle. What I don't understand is why one state would need more than 6 nitrogen plants pulling nitrogen out of the air to make fertilizer... But the answer is that anhydrous ammonia is used as a refrigerant, and industry uses massive amounts of these industrial components to operate. One would have to work for every company to uncover the horrific truth behind the toxic mess on the environment.

Can I ask an honest question? How old are you? The reason I ask is because that can determine the context in which someone views the earth. For example, I grew up in the 1960s, before the EPA. Literally every car smoked, through science we developed catalytic converters and recirculated unburned fuel and other harmful gasses to emit drastically fewer pollutants. We cleaned up water pollution, air pollution, we invented scrubbers for coal fired plants to the only emmissions were water vapor and harmless CO2. We converted city busses to natural gas because the only emmissions were water vapor and CO2. We developed natural gas powered appliances that utilize natural gas at 96% efficiency, only emitting water vapor and CO2. This was all judged to be progress, until "climate" became politicized by Malthusian globalist elites. Now water vapor is a deadly pollutant. You know the story of CO2. OSHA doesn't get worked up about people working in CO2 until it gets to 10,000 parts per million (unless that standard has been corrupted like others). I monitored and enforced that safety standard for years with people working in confined spaces.
Long story short- CO2 is essential for life, without it nothing lives. Nature is more than capable of "balancing out" CO2, that's what nature has done for millions of years. Geology shows that the planet has been warmer and colder, biology and paleontolgy shows that CO2 has been at much higher concentrations and life thrived. Chemistry and physics show that CO2 is a clear, transparent gas, it does not have reflectance like other matter, hence it does not reflect heat, if it did, physics show that it would reflect an equal amount of heat back into space. Without the deadly greenhouse effect, life would not exist on earth.
If all the regulations of the EPA did nothing, then how are more government regulations going to change anything? I can attest, the world is a much cleaner place than it was 50 years ago.
Analyze the solutions for this crisis. The elites make it very clear. Via transhumanism (WEF, etc) they believe they have the ability to achieve immortality. If that is the case, we lesser beings will consume the natural resources they will need 100,000 years from now, so we must be eradicated for their sakes. I have been fortunate to travel all over, the only "dirty" places are urban centers, other than that, nature rules big time. Elites say forget our technology and live with less, not continue to forge better and thrive.

Carbon dioxide is not the same as carbon monoxide and if the atmosphere can handle it all than whatever will be will be. Im not going to give you my age, but it would be assumed I'm young due to my lack of spelling and grammar, I'm just really bad with phonics, and autocorrect sucks. I'm old enough to remember farmers being paid to plant test plots. And I'm old enough to remember the sweet smell of a old car warming up in the cold or running on a hot summer day. The big exhaust clouds in the winter. Yes I remember. I remember when food was food.

Exactly, changers prey on the scientific illiteracy of the masses
I'm an overly analytical POS, only reason I was asking your generation. Climate change has a foothold in specific age groups, and I also have seen a pattern that urban dwellers are most prone to the distortions as well. Who can blame them if the only "nature" they see is Newark, NJ?
You are intelligent, use that to ask one more question in every scenario. Nitrogen is not a pollutant, water vapor is not a pollutant, CO2 is not a pollutant. The UN and WEF are. THey are trying to ban these three substances, a complete impossibilty. You probably remember when Obamacare was rolling out. The Obama admin "hosted" a number of "doctors" on the Whitehouse lawn to show "support" from the "medical community." What the news didn't show was Whitehouse staff passing out white lab coats to everyone who attended- politicians, press, bureaucrats. You know, you can always recognize a doctor in public, because they don't go anywhere without their white lab coats, right? The truth is out there, you are not far from it.

Nitrogen is a pollutant when it is concentrated down to a liquid or into pellets made in to anhydrous, and then applied to thousands of acres in one area by multiple farmers incorrectly applying it. It's shipped via semi and rail causing issues when accidents occur. When underground lines break it renders the area scorched and kills anybody within the fogged danger zone. Nitrogen itself is not a pollutant, it's the products made by nitrogen that cause the pollution.

Okay, I accept your handle as an apt descriptor. You just described ignorance. You have no clue where solid nitrogen products come from, you have no idea how anhydrous nitrogen is applied to farm land, manufactured or transported. The same shipping accidents with liquid oxygen tanks are dangerous. Nitrogen accidents with fogged danger zones? Scorched? You just puke out the bullshit some idiot propagandist dreamed up while playing minecraft. Stop doing research on Tik Tok, just a recommendation. next, stop watching youtube. This spring go to Iowa or Illinois and take a long walk through a farming community and talk to the families driving tractors. They are a whole lot smarter than anyone on youtube or Tik Tok.

Look up anhydrous pipeline bursts on your own in states like Iowa, Nebraska, and Illinois. Untill you have one burst on your land and are stuck dealing with the aftermath then you would have room to talk. Some farmers spray it on top of the soil, other farmers disk it into the ground and some farmers spread it in pellet form like manure. Depends on how lazy the farmer is.

Lazy farmers? With a bigoted comment like that, you have no credibility. Your world is so bad and miserable. I hope you survive somehow in spite of how horrible it is.
In the mean time, I'm really enjoying the environment that is so much cleaner than it it was when I was a child, how beautify the world is, the thriving livestock and wildlife that live all around me. The majestic view of the Bald Eagles and Golden Eagles that fly around my house, along with all the other raptors I watch. When summer comes I'll be going to all of the lazy organic farms where I live to select fresh fruit and vegetables, I don't have to worry about grass fed beef, my freezer is almost full.
Oh, I know, you'll be so smug trying to tell me that pipelines are exploding everywhere, that everyone is an idiot, that I don't live in a vital and vibrant earth. Whatever. Clearly your little world cannot support life.

Untill you been drenched by farmers chemicals due to drift, then only you would understand. If every farmer was farming the same or was held to a federal standard when applying chemicals then I wouldn't feel this way, but after spending years of my life snooping on farming practice I have come to the conclusion that it was very bad for a while, but has drastically improved. You always need to be on the lookout for those unethical farmers willing to spray a low producing crop to death for the insurance money. I've seen it done and still can't believe the ignorance of someone to believe every farmer is upheld to a ethical standard, if they were they sure as hell would cover their crops and rotate them yearly. But even cover crops need to be killed off before planting via chemicals. So really it's one big up to the farmers descension how they choose to operate their fields, unless their stuck in a contract with a seed company.

Don't move to the Midwest. Crop farming and produce farming are two different things. Ones edible the other is animal food. And the farmers who specializes in fresh food are the saints who should be paid way more for their products. Just be on the look out for boxes that say produce under their tables. If you see those then they are just reselling produce bought from a wholesale distributor. The only place that has strict laws against that is California. You can't be in a farmers market in California unless the actual location of the farmer has been verified.

And I know how anhydrous ammonia, a nitrogen product, along with dry ice a nitrogen product is made. The Kock brothers manufacturer a lot of it.

https://illwindnh3.wordpress.com/2018/11/16/ammonia-pipeline-accidents/

Nitrogen is non-flammable, in fact it's used to extinguish fires. Still trust your sources?

Hey DAF, I don't mean to attack your understanding, but I've been watching this deception since the 1960s, in fact I've been in the middle of the "debate" for decades and cancelled before it became trendy. I first became skeptical in the 1980s (the scientific method not withstanding, requiring that all theories must be falsifiable- not only can a theory be proven right, it must be allowed to be proven wrong if that's where the facts lead). After the Mount Saint Helens eruption, there was a lot of scientific study of the impact, and early satellite imagery (yes, it was primitive in the 1980s compared to now) was just beginning to be used for these purposes. In one scientific journal I subscribed to (no internet, we had to research old school) they had an article with satellite images of where the plume of Mt. St. Helens had gone. The next month, a different scientific journal I subscribed to had satellite imagery of the areas impacted by "manmade" acid rain, supposedly due to the concentration of coal fired power plants well east of the acidified areas. If you were to place your palms together, you would see what those 2 images looked like, they overlapped perfectly.
Now don't get me wrong, the fanatic reaction to acid rain enhanced thousands of jobs where I lived as the low sulphur coals of the west replaced the high sulphur coals of eastern coal mines, but I still read meteorlogical evidence that showed prevailing winds moved all high sulpher emissions away from the acid rain impacted area. Lo and behold, as soon as the legislation passed to eliminate high sulphur coal, the problem disappeared, even though not one plant had been converted to western coal. Geologically we know that the acidity of volcanic erruptions is essential for breaking down rock into soils. As the acids of St. Helens did their work, acidity levels dropped as they always do.
Ozone holes were next- freon a molecularly heavy compound known to concentrate at ground level was to blame for holes naturally occuring over the south and north poles, again, based on primitive satellite imagery. It didn't add up scientifically. Again, immediately after legislation banning freon in the US passed, the problem was solved, even though 85% of the world still manufactured and used freon up until just a few years ago. Dow Chemical was about to lose the freon patent, so to create a market for their new refrigerant, they fed a series of lies. See where skepticism comes from?

Every picture tells a story, oh I know presenting facts-- TL;DR I'm going to get a Red Bull, do you want one?

As soon as a "Climate Denier" (definition- Noun- person who understands science and isn't trying to manipulate the public for political purposes) asks a question that exposes the fraudulent claims of the CO2 movement, they regroup and make claims like- the Sun has NOTHING to do with the temperature of the earth, plants can tell the difference between sweet tasting natural CO2 and acky acky poo poo MANMADE Deadly CO2!!! Glaciers are melting at unprecidented rates, exposing ancient forests that grew a mere 10,000 years ago and mankind is making it warmer than it has ever been in the history of the earth!!!! What? Warmer when the trees were growing before the glacier? Why do you ask that, don't you beleive the SCIENCE you dispicable CLIMATE/SCIENCE DENIER!!! Burn him! Burn the Heretic! We'll capture the CO2 his burning produces to SAVE THE PLANET!!!!!

Farms are shutting down because corporate thugs said you can't plans our seeds unless you do this, and that, spray this and that. You need this amount of bushels per year or else. It's the practice of not being allowed to replant the seeds grown in a year because a company owns the right to the seeds.

The thugs are not just the corporations, like Monsanto and Bayer, it is the power hungry politicians.

Obama signed the Monsanto protection act which allowed GMO farms to sue non GMO farms because the non GMO crops were "contaminating" the GMO crops. GMO crops are sterile and do not reproduce. Cross pollination isn't "contaminating" the GMO crops it is destroying the non GMO crops by making them also sterile. It is suicide because when crops can no longer reproduce then we have to look for alternate types of plants to eat and then the GMO vs non GMO cycle will repeat until there are no edible plants for us or any other animal left.

It is the private/public partnerships (aka fascism) that is destroying the planet, not capitalism.

It's the government that subsidizes the farmer telling them what they will pay if a crop is planted. What's the little guy to do. But yes politics sleeping with corporate greed and making laws that make corporations untouchable is disgusting. As if they were human with constitutional rights. It's a chemical jungle out their and no regulations on the amount of production.

Monsanto and others are the epitome of corporate corruption-- it goes beyond this-- the UN and WEF have published a common goal of depopulating of earth. And the US continues to be the majority funding for the UN.