Applying Leftist Logic

86frgn.gif (click to show)
Especially with a whole reading "rainbow" of inappropriate literature for children.

The left would now gobble him up for pretending to be blind and not allowing a true visually impaired person to play LaForge.

Check this out, the left now wants to promote bestiality with dinosaurs. Who would of thought???

Barney is a dinosaur from our imagination - he's really gay and will take your family away, but God says that's an abomination.

bro frrrrrrrrrr im homeschooled and thats part of the reason why im homeschooled

:0)

Breaking news: The leftists now want to promote bestiality

Why would Kiss be a problem?

You don't know why KnightsInSatanicService would be a problem?

Cuz there's people that don't want to.

Don't want to what? What has this got to do with homeschooling?

You are comparing a famous rock band with people who dress innapropriately in front of children. Leftist love to compare apples and oranges to win arguments.

Thanks for explaining that. Leftist logic requires a lot of imagination or just enough brutal force to pound a square peg into a round hole.

You are welcome my friend

Bowie started it all. It was called glam rock in the 70's. It was about bringing theatrics in to rock music. Alice Cooper picked up on it. Peter Gabriel, back when he was with Genesis. Marc Bolen (aka T. Rex) and Elton John all jumped on the glam rock train. And then it all seemed to fizzle out. Then out of nowhere Kiss shows up. Then Alice Cooper started wearing his make again.

But it was all a stage show to entertain their audiences.

Drag queens are all about entertaining themselves. But even with them a lot of them are doing it for theatrics. They just aren't usually part of a rock band or theater stage production. They perform at drag bars.

It was the left who said we need to expose drag queens to very small children to terrorize and the desensitize them to this new world they are forcing on everyone.

A new world that is leading to the left's ultimate goal of pedophilia.

Moderators: Be very careful when reading this. I said the left, not drag queens and not any other protected group.

It is the left who tried to bring down a movie that exposed the horrors of pedophilia, child sex slavery and human trafficking. The right didn't do that, it was the pedophile left. The entire reason why the left (not gays and lesbians) formed the alphabet collective of people with nothing in common was for the left to work pedophiles into that collective.

Interesting that you said drag queens are a protected group. So why attack them just because they are trying to read a childrens story to a classroom.

I'm not attacking drag queens. You misunderstood. When did ANY drag queen just say one day, "Hey, let's not just perform for each other in our drag clubs/bars, lets go to elementary schools and perform there"???? That did not happen.

This idea came from the left. They arranged for drag queens to perform and/or read to students in elementary schools.

Why? Because of the massive cultural and moral decline in the United States. Ten years ago it was unthinkable to expose young children to anything remotely like "drag queen hour". No one would have ever signed off on that.

In this nation we have slowly seen the rights of everyone be taken away, including parental rights.

What responsible parent woke up one day and phoned the schools begging to have "drag queen hour" for small children? It is absurd. This whole nation has lost it's mind on so many things. Common sense, reality, science, logic, reason and even history have all been thrown out the window when it comes to this insane leftist ideology that's being forced on us.

Parents, not the government, not the Democrat party, not the Marxists, have the sole right to raise their children as they best see fit. No responsible parent would ever think it is a good idea to expose small children to drag queens twerking in their faces. And like I said, it is not entirely the drag queen's fault. The drag queen's only fault was to agreeing with the liberals and doing this.

This is not good for child psychology. This frightens a lot of small children. It confuses a lot of others. That is not what our school system was ever designed for. The job of our schools is to educate, not indoctrinate or terrorize small children. Can we just go back to educating our children?

If braindead liberals want to warp their own children they are completely at liberty to take their kids to see drag queens at a drag bar. There is nothing stopping them other than laws against bringing minors into a bar. It doesn't have be at a bar, they can invite a drag queen into their house. Or they can find some other place. But that place must never ever be a school. It is counter to what education is all about.

So schools are off-limits for drag queens? Gotcha. Let’s keep these protected groups away from the rest of society, maybe put them in jail until they change their ways.

Why does the left always take to the extremes?. I never said hide them from society or put them in jail. Don't be absurd.

Could you explain what kind of educational value a drag queen brings to a school? If it is just based on the fact that they are reading to students then why drag queens? Anyone who knows how to read can read to students.

Why not bring a Pastor or a Priest into public schools to read? Do you have a problem with that? I will bet serious money you are screaming YES at me right now. I'll bet you have a huge problem with that.

However, It is not a violation of the separation of Church and State in the since that Thomas Jefferson meant it when he coined that phrase. It is not how Justice Black interpreted that phrase in the Supreme Court's 1947 Iverson v The Board of Education ruling that was immediately grabbed by the left and turned completely around, because they were not happy with the ruling. A Minister, Bishop, Pastor, Elder, Priest, Missionary, Preacher, Rabbi, or any other religious leader has the right to read to students in a public school under the Constitution.

In fact the Bible used to be taught in public schools up until the 1940's.

So why specifically drag queens? What is their purpose in public education? Are they there to teach students how to dress like men who are lampooning how woman dress through extreme exaggeration? How is that going to help students in their later lives?

Is there ANY reason why drag queens must twerk in the faces of small children? How does that help these children with anything.

And like I said, neither the government, YOU, the schools or anyone else is responsible for what those children learn. It is 100% the parents responsibility. There was a time when public education honored that idea and promised to only teach what will prepare them for the world. That concept has been thrown out the window years ago.

Exposing kids to drag queen is not education. Most of them will never knowingly meet a drag queen. I've never knowingly met a drag queen and I've been around for a long time and have lived in a lot of different places in this country. I grew up in the Los Angeles area and I still never knowingly ever met a drag queen. I've met gay people but gay does not mean drag queen.

Can you tell me one good reason why a drag queen, and only a drag queen, must read to kids in school? Why must they twerk in front of kids faces? How does that help with English, science or math?

Why do you take extremes?

Haven't you heard? I'm a right wing extremist. Just like this nations founding fathers. I want extreme freedom for everyone.

No you're not, and no you don't.

Who's being the contrarian?

How many times have I told you that I am on the side of freedom, liberty and inalienable rights, rights that are give to us by our Creator? Oh, like, just about every single time I have replied to you.

Because I believe in that makes me a "right wing extremist" in the eyes of the left. Because believing in all men and women being free live their own lives without government intervention some how causes the left to call us Nazis and fascists. Showing just how utterly insane the left is.

Why attack people who want to dress in "sexy" attire that leaves nothing to the imagination - and then wear that outfit in front of children... Why would anyone be upset about people dressing sexy in front of children.... Do you even hear how you sound right now?

Why should we attack people trying to bring sexual situations to children... You're sick man.

You think drag queens are sexy. To each his own I guess. I won’t judge.

Amazing you can't see the quote marks around the phrase sexy. You have school tomorrow go to bed

Inside jokes are the funniest 😆

Indeed they are,,,

Leftists are exploiting drag queens. Instead of debating real policy, we are arguing about this. Leftists can't defend socialism so this is what they do. We don't want socialism! Please get that through your thick head! Socialism is a proven failure!

I can tell how much you want to get rid of minimum wage, social security, labor unions, and so on.

I can tell how much you want to crush democracy, free speech, private ownership, and indoctrinate children. I don't want to live in your socialist paradise. Thousands of Cubans, N. Koreans, and Venseuellans are trying to escape it.

But it's YOUR meme. You're the OP.

No, David Bowie didn't. Alice Cooper did it before him, and before Alice there was Screaming Jay Hawkins, and before him, Esquerita (whom Little Richard copied), and before him, Billy Wright - when Bowie was still in diapers.

Also, Alice never started wearing his make again because he hadn't stopped. Nor did the rest fizzle, except maybe Bolan though not till a cpl years after Kiss hit the scene, originally modeling themselves after the New York Dolls, btw, before...

Glam rock started with Bowie. Technically speaking Cooper was not a glam rocker. His music was different than Bowie, T-Rex, Peter Gabriel, etc. But I do know that Gabriel was heavily influence by both Bowie and Cooper on what they were doing. Peter Gabriel even flew to Los Angeles to meet with Cooper. He got sidetracked by William Friedkin who wanted Gabriel to write music for a movie he was producing. That movie deal never worked out and Gabriel flew back to England after that. I don't remember if he ever met with Cooper or not but I don't think he did.

If you were alive back then you were probably a baby. I wasn't. I spent my entire teen years in the 70's and turned 20 in 1978. You read about it and I watched it happen.

The other whom you talked about weren't part of glam rock.

Cooper always looked at what he did on stage as an act and he was an entertainer by performing his stage act. There was a period of time for a few years in the late 70's when he stopped wearing makeup. The same with Kiss. When Cooper and Kiss both started to have a come back in the 80s they both returned to wearing their iconic makeup again and have been doing ever since.

Bolan didn't fizzle out, Bolan died in a car accident. He was driving drunk. I also don't remember Bolan wearing makeup. His music was considered glam rock. He may have actually started the glam rock name, him and Bryan Ferry of Roxy Music.

The New York Dolls were not Kiss's inspiration, they were contemporaries and their styles were entirely different. The Dolls were more like Bowie than Kiss when it came to their make up. Kiss was hard rock and the Dolls were punk.

Cooper and Bowie, in my opinion, were unaware of what each other was doing because they were so different of each other. Gabriel, himself, said that he was inspired by both. Cooper legally changed his name to Alice Cooper when the Alice Cooper band split up so that he could keep the name. Gabriel, on the other hand, showed up just as one of Genesis's shows was starting wearing his wife's red dress. The band had no idea and were just as shocked as the audience was. After that he created costumes for different characters in Genesis's songs. The Peter Gabriel everyone knew in the 80's had stopped wearing costumes and makeup with the exception of some of his early videos (Shock the Monkey).

No, it did not.
As usual you're just making stuff up to be a contrarian.

Seriously, what's the purpose of a wall of text that no one even bothers to read, let alone - in case you haven't noticed - agree with?

"Seriously, what's the purpose of a wall of text that no one even bothers to read, let alone - in case you haven't noticed - agree with?"

Are you calling yourself, "no one"?

I'm not the contrarian here. I made comment to LordZerostrike98 and you butted in with a contrary opinion.

If I want to type a whole lot then so what? Am I upset that you never read it? Nope. But it does bother me when I say something and you reply with a comment that clearly shows you didn't read it. I don't know why it should bother me because your the one who looks foolish, not me.

Why did you bring up about you getting upset?

You're your own worst enemy. You try to illicit a certain reaction, and you do. From yourself.

"Am I upset that you never read it? Nope."

With you, maybe. With everyone else, I am trying to educate. I used to try to educate you as well but I saw that was a waste of time. So I just mess with you. I really have nothing against you. But the way you used to harass all the time, I just want to know what kind of reaction were you expecting from me?

How many of those Kiss members are dressing up in "sexy" attire and reading to kids? None? Hmmm almost as if this is a Straw Man argument.

All of them?
Look up all the accusations hurled at Kiss back in the day, and tell me if it doesn't sound familiar.

I remember people claiming Kiss was satanic, but I don't remember Kiss forcing kids in schools to listen to socialist & trans indoctrination.

Of course, you suddenly 'remember' what the self-righteous called the most 'evil' band in history not doing something in schools that to date no one has ever done ever.

The song remains the same,,,

Modda how can we take you seriously when you simp for Lady Dimitrescu??

Kiss is just another strawman because you can defend drag queen story hour.

I saw footage of a kid getting a lap dance from a drag queen in school. Here you can see it also. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oVY5F9Dksw

That you actually watch that, well, that says it right there.

Save your links, because no, I won't.

Here is a story about it. Do you think this is OK? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11916303/Drag-queen-performs-lap-dance-teen-gyrates-cheering-children.html

I can? Who tha heck said that? I'm not even talking about it.

Kiss is a Rock group from way back. Look them up