Correct. You offered undeniable proof that you don't know what is required to earn a PhD, therefore it is implausible that you have one. It's like saying you got a driver's license simply by taking the exam for the permit but not the actual driver's test. You don't just forget the hard sweat inducing part.
Of note, you resort to a certain pattern referring to (irrelevant) feelings a tad bit too often for your own good:
▶️ "regularfeller 0 ups, 10h
I offered proof.
Why haven't you offered what you would find acceptable as verification?
Too manic from feeling like you're ridiculing another?
Is this because your inner being feels "small"?
Your ego reliant on hurting others?
Why are you and your sidekick such angry, bitter, and jealous people?"
▶️ "regularfeller 0 ups, 9h, 1 reply
Wasn't because Hillary identifies as a woman it was because Hillary is a horrible human being.
No links or websites required (posting them doesn't have the effect you imagine).
Now, your nasty, bitter, angry reply will come with animosity equal to that if I had insulted your mother
Let'er rip 😄"
▶️ "regularfeller 0 ups, 9h
Sounds like a lot of emoting about your feelings being hurt.
Boo hoo poor you and the hell with anyone else's feeeeeeelings is narcissistic don't you think?"
🟧 The problem with projection/deflections is that they are, by definition, projection/deflections. You're taking basic comments a little too personally when they shouldn't be taken that way even slightly.
