Sunset

It’s already been proven.
I guess your mama hadn’t squirted you out at that time. It was in all the papers and on the idiot box for years .
What “proof” of what “crime” is there against Trump? Now, remember, all those other allegations against Trump have not borne out.

No, sonny. This is happening because Trump is and was an outsider threatening to expose the rot in DC.
!!!!

Ridiculous. If Trump wasn't a swamp drainer, the media wouldn't give two shits about him, and the klowns on the left would be forced into forming their own opinion about him.

And ignore the ratings? You seriously don’t know what media cares about.

Snark is all you ever got, kid.
I’ve been watching for 6+years how you crooks operate. You have the MEDIA, the Deep State, and the entire crooked apparatus of the DNC conjuring crimes against Trump that didn’t exist. You guys project the crimes that you commit on those you want to destroy. It is your M.O.

You’re confusing snark with facts.

Snark is calling someone a kid.

Stating the fact that Trump’s DOJ indicted zero corrupt officials is fact.

Politico?

Hint: No, it doesn’t.

This is why your resentment to sources makes no sense.

I was validating your claim, not disproving it.

Lol

You can’t even troll well.

Yes. Even CNN reported on it.

I stated facts. You choose to ignore them.

You stated a fact. You failed to prove it. It was pretty easy to do and you didn’t.

Here ya go!

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/14/clinton-settles-sexual-harassment-suit-1998-983371

Next time instead of shouting ad homenims, state facts and move on.

Anti asked for proof, you gave snark.

That is also a fact.

Anti gave more facts, you gave more snark.

Give more facts and troll less.

So, prove it! Courts cannot indict over a case that exists only in the comments section of the Internet!!!

You are a broken record.
Oh, snap! I forget who I am talking to… a record is a vinyl disc about 12” in diameter that was used to record sound that could be reproduced over and over again when placed on a rotating surface. Through the use of electronic amplifiers and speakers, the sound recorded on the vinyl disc (record) could be reproduced and you could listen to it.
A “broken record” has a scratch on the recording grooves that cause the needle on the record player to skip over and over and over and play the same notes over and over and over and over, well, you the picture.

Ad homenim

No substance.

Waste of a comment.

FYI:
CNN says $850k to Paula Jones
MSNBC interview with Michael Avenatti, before his current prison stint, $120k to Stormy Daniels

The difference between the two situations: 850-120 = $730k

https://www.cnn.com/2016/01/07/politics/bill-clinton-history-2016-election/

So,
...if one were to do the work, & then prove it, then what?

Do tell

...sort of like Congressman Dennis Kucinich in 2007
calling for the impeachment of Dick Cheney?

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-politics-cheney/democratic-lawmaker-seeks-to-impeach-cheney-idUSSIB48589920070425

Lol. Clinton did actual crime. Not the same thing.

It’s really not. Assuming you’re talking about Bill… here is what Trump had to say about that:

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/flashback-donald-trump-called-bill-clintons-accusers-terrible/story?id=42686582

My point being it’s seems a-okay to trump supporters to lock people up over politics, Hillary (who has never been indicted. Not even under Trump’s DOJ- so much for Promises Kept), but when it’s your guy…

It’s a non-starter.

Did you watch the Comey presser about HRC? IF not, as a well informed lib, I'm sure you've watched it fully and didn't just rely on the media to tell you what he said... right?

So tell me, honesty if that's even possible for you, that as you listened to that weasel Comey rattling off every illegal thing HRC did, that you weren't expecting him to recommend an indictment. Go on, just lie to me again gumby, one more time. I enjoy it so much!

I did not watch it.

I read it.

It isn’t his job to recommend indictment. He made that very clear. He also made clear that the actions weren’t criminal but that sanctions would need to be made.

In short, she got off on a technicality because of the digital precedent.

Even when Trump’s DOJ got the info, they did nada.

In fact, Biden’s DOJ has not made any indictments to Trump’s own snafu. The difference is that in Trump’s case, there is more than enough evidence to prove intent. Yet, the DOJ has remained pretty solid on this. Aside from raising Trump’s private locations, of course. Their intent is to recover the documents, not arrest. Even Trump may get off on a technicality. They’re still investigating but I somehow doubt that they will ultimately indict him. Not unless they keep finding more documents but it’s pretty clear the government is playing it fast and loose with where classified documents. From Hillary’s private server, Biden’s garage, Trump’s resort, etc.

As for the New York crime, if that’s all Trump gets, he will likely be fined and that’s it. Unless he’s stupid enough to not pay or settle. But that would be incredibly uncharacteristic of him to do so.

"Even when Trump’s DOJ got the info, they did nada."

Back then, I was of the mindset to just let it go, because harassing someone like HRC does the country no good. It only divides us, as is the situation now with Trump. I hope they cuff him and parade him in front of the media, because doing that will do nothing more than fuel his narrative that he's the only candidate that drain the swamp, and protect the average American from the swamp. The left just can't get out of its own way when it comes to Trump, and that includes a local DA who seems to want to charge Trump with a federal election crime. I'm not sure how that works out from a jurisdictional standpoint, but we may find out pretty soon.

I was also against what the republicans did to HRC's husband while he was president, as it smacked of nothing more than political hackery and really had nothing to do with his performance as president. I suppose what the left is doing to Trump now is payback for that. Unfortunately, neither side will stop there.

I would say that my fellow citizens on the left learned nothing of what I learned from those situations, and in fact, learned the wrong lesson entirely.

And no, I don't assume you're a liberal. I'm not sure why you think that you do. If I slipped up and called you a liberal, that's my mistake. I hope you don't assume I'm a conservative. I'd be a Libertarian if they were sensible on foreign policy, and weren't an utter joke as a political party. That being said, I will also quote Penn Jilette: "You have to be careful as a libertarian because you can sound very Republican." The same should go for those who aren't liberals, imo.

He’s too stupid or incompetent to drain the swamp. Probably both.

So now letting US citizens and soldiers die through negligence (not even going to mention the deets about her private mail server) is the same as allegedly paying hush money over an affair?

Lib morals and ethics right there, gumby.

Pretty sure it doesn’t matter if his crime is worse or not, though she was thoroughly investigated by Republicans and they came up nada (or worse, let her go).

Also, fraud is the crime. He falsified business documents. An accountant took down Capone after all was said and done. It is likely the same with Trump.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna75594.

If you want Hillary, check her banks accounts.

Follow the money.

Keep dreaming, gumby. It's all the left has to desperately cling to.

The left, moderates, and conservatives who didn’t drink the orange kool-aid.