What can go wrong forcing an untested vaccine on kids?

my grampa died from the vaccine the whole things a darn lie

I suppose that corroborates the life insurance industry experiencing a significant increase in adult excess deaths claims.

How? The increase in excess deaths began in 2020.

There are still excess deaths after the “vaccine” and boosters were rolled out.

Yes. Covid is still killing nearly 400 people per day. (Primarily the unvaccinated.)

Covid hardly kills under 45 years of age. Excess deaths of under 45 years is high.

Idk how many deaths they were expecting but there's ~132,000 deaths (age 18-49) right there.. not including anything from 2022 or 2023

Australia has excess deaths and not the fentanyl problems USA has.

https://dailyclout.io/how-are-they-ever-going-to-explain-the-excess-mortality-data-in-australia/

1. Covid Cases and Deaths both skyrocketed in Australia beginning in the same time frame your source is looking at..... so call me crazy but more excess deaths at that time would make sense.

2. Australia only has a few million more people than the state of Florida so a relatively small increase in excess deaths among those under 45 could lead to a high percentage increase.

3. To go back to fentanyl Australia may not be on the level that America is yet as far as fentanyl deaths, but they aren't exactly opioid free either... In 2016 they were roughly 5 deaths per 100,000 people and last year a record amount of fentanyl ($18million worth) was seized by the feds in Australia.

https://dailyclout.io/how-are-they-ever-going-to-explain-the-excess-mortality-data-in-australia/

Post vaccine excess deaths.

They need put in prison

Source?

Pseudoscientific studies wont prove anything MAGAt

Too bad you didn't take that same position when the pseudoscientific "studies" (I had to put the quotes around studies, because... well, they're barely even pseudoscientific, meaning barely studies) came out that the govt used as a pretense to tell us the vaccines were safe.

Science is objective and skeptical, not a matter of political expediency, although for you it sure looks like it is.

Dude I was not even awarw if the givernment thing back then.

And ironic how you claim that politics ru8n science yet you and other cons like skewing up scientific resesarch with your right wing bias

Actually, I'm not a conservative and my political bias is only towards small govt and freedom. So anything I write should be interpreted from that perspective if you want to truly understand what I'm trying to say, instead of inferring meaning into what I write that is based on / clouded by your own opinions.

Yeah, I get it. That's not usually going to happen! But I figure if I let you know, at least you have the opportunity to do that, if you should want to.

"you claim that politics ru8n science"

Sorry, but I'm not quite sure what you're trying to tell me with that... politics ruin science, maybe?

I'm not sure that's quite what I'm saying, although the two fields are quite opposite in the sense that the scientific method assumes (hell, requires) skepticism, and assumes ideas are not correct until proven to be correct. Also, science doesn't suppress information, as the left did when the covid pandemic was raging, ironically by saying that if you questioned them and their policies (mask mandates, vax mandates, etc.) that you were questioning the science, and that you can't question science. Well, bullshit to that. That's about as unscientific of a claim as you'll ever here, hence the irony.

Science can handle being wrong, and in fact is geared towards the assumption of being wrong, even well after the scientific community's consensus is that they're right. Always doubting, always skeptical. Whereas politics / politicians (and throw in religion while we're at it) is not at all comfortable with being told they're wrong, let alone thinking that they could e wrong. They suppress knowledge in order to maintain the status quo, which is usually a power-based tactic, meaning they use that to maintain whatever power they have over us. It's particularly insidious when the govt does it.

Sorry to ramble on! But as far as being right wing or conservative, like I said, no. I'm mostly conservative fiscally, quite liberal socially. I would be a Libertarian, except I'm not xenophobic (my wife was born in another country, if that matters) and they're pretty much a straight cluster fcuk when it comes to being a serious political party.

Okay, exiting soap box mode now...

Claims not to be Right Wing, spews the usual "but Left" propaganda nonsense.

Exactly what a conservative does.

But if one claims not to be left wing but spews the usual but Right truth, then they may be a moderate or neocon

He makes a lot of claims, all appear to be unfounded.

Done

thanx.

Apparently Fat_Elvis calls himself "a Libertarian"

I mean there are some libertarians who are anti_vax, but do you think Fat_Elvis is truely a Libertarian?

Walks/Quacks/Duck

He's not anything he claims to be.

Another key difference between a far-right idiot and a libertarian is that libertarians are pro-cannabis.

Verdict: Pants on Fire.

Explanation:

There was already a fact check that shows that COVID-19 vaccines have not caused a 1,000 per cent surge in excess deaths of children. The claim initially stated that in children aged 0-14 there has been a horrifying 542 per cent INCREASE in excess death this year compared with last year in Europe. Soon after, the claim was revised, showing the figure was meant be showing deaths of children have gone upwards to 1,101 per cent.

The original claim referred to "excess deaths", which are any deaths in addition to what would normally be expected given past trends, including those directly and indirectly related to COVID-19. However, this claim was even worse with specifying the 17x increase in child deaths came from the COVID vaccine.

Tim Adair, principal research fellow with Melbourne University's School of Population and Global Health, took issue with the blogger's "problematic" comparison of 2022 with 2021.

This was "because much of Europe spent large parts of the first half of 2021 in lockdown, a period when deaths in ages 0-14 years were lower than the baseline or expected level".

Dr Adair suggested that the post-lockdown resurgence of respiratory infections such as influenza and pneumonia could be playing a role in younger groups.

Meanwhile, Mr Jdanov said the increase might be explained by the "long-term consequences of the pandemic", such as overloaded public health systems, postponed treatments and screenings and the consequences of lockdowns.

Some of those same factors may also be pushing up infant mortality, he said.

Sources used:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-09-02/fact-check-excess-deaths-europe-not-vaccines/101394264

At least its just British people

of course... because they reported the truth...

Who?

here's a clue... It's in the meme...