The logic of this meme is making my head hurt. He is a loser basically, if there was a competition on being a loser he would come in second because even he can't be number 1 because he sucks. However, wouldn't that mean that the person in number 1 would be the biggest loser? Then again the fact that they would win there would ultimately lower their position and allow the next person in line to be number 1, but then wouldn't the next person be pushed down because they were winning then as well? If so then would it be possible that second place WOULD INDEED be the lowest low, because if he came in last place that would also mean he was a winner more often than the rest, or maybe it would make more sense if he was the biggest loser in the loser competition if he DID come in last place? OK, my head hurts now BUT I MADE YOU READ LIKE 2 PARAGRAPHS PUT TOGETHER
HAHAHAHA HUNEJFNRQJFRJFIGF#@IFJ@#JF@J*GF#JGF^F&@G&*FG&Fugn5t5tuogtuoiwehrjvnhfh89nfzgn tw4dg4jku,byjldcyti7g8juqc8ni7cux3914jfnx284y5g20#