This is for all the liberal nitwits that have rabidly argued that this wasn't true.

We already got Hitler's record, now for the new Universe record!

Now do one about the Southern Baptist Convention (which you won't, of course) and how racist their founders were

Jesus was not racist. Enought of your religious group hate. Stop trying to point fingers and admit that plant parenthood funder was racist, since evidence stacks against you and you ran out of options to defend it. Stop the hate Octavia_Melody.

Yeah, he only yelled at that Gentile women to leave?

Oh, but then later he had a change of heart, or so the Roman written story says.

Who are you?

And actually, Jesus was kind of racist. He compared non-Jews to dogs and pigs

"Jesus was not racist"

And Jesus didn't start the Southern Baptist Convention

"Stop trying to point fingers and admit that plant parenthood funder was racist"

She supported eugenics, and that was wrong. I never said otherwise

"Jesus was kind of racist. He compared non-Jews to dogs and pigs" please provide source.

Jesus was and still the fundation of all Christian churches, including Southern Baptist. You should know this, it is basic.

You're missing the point. I'm referring to the actual human beings alive in the 19th century who started the Southern Baptist Convention

Please show me your source for this outrageous claim "Jesus was kind of racist. He compared non-Jews to dogs and pigs".

Matthew 7:6 and Matthew 15:26

Out of context and way wrong. Jesus is not calling non-jews dogs and pigs. You are just picking pieces of the Bible without any context.

Matthew 7:6

"“Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces."

Nowhere in there he is portraying non-jews. You lied again.

The metaphor seems to be teaching against giving what is considered just or holy to those who do not appreciate it. Animals such as dogs and pigs cannot appreciate ethics, and this verse implies that there is even some class of human beings who cannot, either.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_7:6#:~:text=The%20metaphor%20seems%20to%20be,human%20beings%20who%20cannot%2C%20either.

Matthew 15:26
He replied, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to the dogs.”

Again, nowhere in there Jesus is calling non-jews dogs. You lied again.

https://www.bibleref.com/Matthew/15/Matthew-15-26.html

It appears to me you just did a quick Google lookup for verses where Jesus mentioned "dog" and "pig". Spreading lies is all you do. With no context or effort put into them. You act from pure hatred to Christianity and Christians. And like your father, the devil, you will do his will to twist what God says.

I assume you are accusing William Bullein Johnson, since you did not gave names, of being racist. Show me the evidence of him being racist.

"Nowhere in there he is portraying non-jews"

That's what the verse is referring to

"Again, nowhere in there Jesus is calling non-jews dogs"

Read the verses in context, because yes he is

"It appears to me you just did a quick Google lookup for verses where Jesus mentioned "dog" and "pig"."

That's not what I did, I already knew about those verses.

"Spreading lies is all you do"

Which, ironically, is a lie itself

"You act from pure hatred to Christianity and Christians"

I hate harmful ideologies, yes

"And like your father, the devil, you will do his will to twist what God says"

The devil is make-believe

"I assume you are accusing William Bullein Johnson"

I'm pointing out that the SBC had racist and pro-slavery beginnings, which it did.

You are wrong and out of context. You did not even bothered to read the articles about the context of what Jesus was talking about, which again no where in there he is calling non-jews dogs and pigs. And you did not brought anything to the argument to prove wrong, or back up your claims, your response was all denials, which you are entitled to but does not make you right, you are still wrong. Further more you shifted focus from "actual human beings alive in the 19th century who started the Southern Baptist Convention" to "SBC had racist and pro-slavery beginnings, which it did" after you could not find anything on the human being that started it William Bullein Johnson. If you cant argue just crawl back out with your tail between your legs.

"You did not even bothered to read the articles about the context of what Jesus was talking about"

I did not read them because it's always the same tired crap from apologists trying to downplay or twist what the Bible says when it looks bad

"Further more you shifted focus from "actual human beings alive in the 19th century who started the Southern Baptist Convention" to "SBC had racist and pro-slavery beginnings, which it did" after you could not find anything on the human being that started it William Bullein Johnson."

I was referring to the people who started the SBC. I was as clear about that as I could be.