Well you sure showed us! Watcha gonna do next? Get off welfare to protest welfare cuts?

.....and more importantly....not breeding another generation of woke leftist bedwetters

Bedwetting is a physical problem that affects everyone. I have a nephew that struggled with that for years and he was republican.

I know someone with dementia who is president of the US and no one is talking about it in the mainstream media.....

:0)

What’s with the “ab*rtion” ?
Why not just spell it out??

If you use certain words it gets flagged for some kind of review. I've used various words that apparently do that and it takes maybe 12 hours to show up...at 4am
When I block out the words its fine

. . .people have been telling them to do that for decades!

Man... It's almost as if an ... how old was she? 11? 14?
And she was in what state with what laws voted by which state senate majority?
Hmmm...
Can't put my finger on it. I mean, it's not like it's a special case or anything, because this sort of thing has been going on a lot in the country for years - this heinous crime affects everyone from all walks of life; offenders of this sort don't care about politics. But be that as it may, it did happen, and now it's aired out for everyone to see why this was necessary, and why you were fools to stop it.
Fact: you can’t get a divorce finalized if pregnant in Missouri. Forced pregnancies can prolong abusive situations. As if there should be any question to whom the custody should fall to once a baby is born in this case. You know how many times it takes a woman to flee an abusive relationship successfully on average? 7. 7 times. I didn't look up how long it takes on average between those times, but I don't imagine it's the next day if you're being beaten. This can perpetuate a cycle of "keeping her pregnant so she can't leave" which, for abusers who do this for control and power, would absolutely take this avenue.
I'm not saying you advocate this. Who would? But we're enabling this behavior by having these laws. I get it, a lot of people think that abortion is murder but... In situations like these, these laws force women to go to war for their lives -literally- and that of the children to keep them alive. Catching this before it gets to this point generally doesn't leave much time to act before it becomes apparent. Restraining orders don't do anything. And women who kill the men in self defense? They go to prison.

It's just a mess. I'm not saying that we should advocate for what some view as murder either. I am saying, let women who have this responsibility to bear on their own conscience be the bearer of their own cross. Often, religion is cited. All I am going to say is that, this doesn't pass the LEMON test enacted in the 70s.

We can at least agree, at the minimum - the bare minimum - that it is heinous to say that women should "keep their legs closed?" as a blanket statement with regard to abortion?
(Rape cases)

Going further, can we agree that it is heinous to yell at women who have a lot of children and require EBT assistance and can barely hold a job because she needs the state to pay her to watch her 8 kids.

(cont)

These 8 kids she doesn't get hardly any personal profit after any expenses are paid and her job is to ensure they grow older aand healthier, but still, knowing a life of poverty, social ostracization, harassment by other civilians for her life choices.? Can we agree it is heinous to yell at these people for sticking to their pro-life values?

If we cannot agree on this, Could we at least agree, in this case, that the right to bear children is being infringed upon by economic inequality? Can we agree then, that in order to achieve the pursuit of happiness, financial independence, the american dream etc., etc., we must rectify either permitting abortion to save massive costs to an increasing population that has an instinctual need to breed like everyone else does, so that we don't see a sharp uptick in the homeless, the adopted, the disenfranchised the people who stuck to having children because they are pro-life and love their spouse.

Or, at the very least, agree that we need to expand our social welfare for the poverty class? No? So, can we agree that we should let them take care of it themselves? No? Guess we gotta tell the 11 year old she's been f**ked by old men twice now. (figuratively speaking the first, her offender, the second the proverbial sense in which the majority of the SCOTUS who voted in favor of this issue were old men. Some of which, have scandals of sexual allegations that cannot be proven either way. Hmm.

These laws don't help anyone. They don't help our growing poverty class, they don't help the strain on our taxes - (imagine all those pell grants for college loans, the debt racked up from student debt. Taxes gonna hit harder and harder, education gets more expensive, our national IQ plummets (as it already has been) and poof. We aren't Number 1 anymore.

It is clear that environmental factors play a huge role in average IQ. In order to avoid our booming population being filled to the brim with uneducated voters, we need to execute the following strategy to prevent his from happening: Factors that have been positively associated with higher IQ include:

good nutrition (EBT)
regular schooling of good quality (left wing often votes for paying our teachers more)
laws requiring fortification of certain food products (EBT)
laws establishing safe levels of pollutants, like lead (Flint Michigan? Urban Cities (red and blue alike)
musical training in childhood (oof, that's a tough sell)
/more

higher socioeconomic status (so, I take this as general quality of life - housing, medical, transportation needs, etc.)
lower incidence of infectious diseases (Medicare for All).

Can we at least agree that since we know that people will have sex whether you want them to or not, will create this problem of starvation and homelessness if we don't put in more to fund it in anticipation of these new restrictive laws. We aren't feeling it now, but give it ten years, that bill is going to start piling up. We're being hit by a 20 year drought in California, they're running out of water, one of their engines just blew, it's too expensive to fix. Europe burned pretty badly this last summer. Australia and Western America got hit badly in 2020, we had a supply crisis, there's a war going on in Ukraine and they were blowing up silos of grain, a lot of the world's grain comes from Ukraine.

Do you - really - think that our morality (assuming whatever argument for pro-life is) is so important, that we would rather starve our country and enable a society where the gap between poverty and wealth is so high that the middle class will be swallowed by that gap with the rest of the poverty class, creating a feedback effect as this effects more people? While, at the same time, AI is also on the horizon for groundbreaking technology that is going to start putting people out of work.

What. A. Mess.

Got any ideas?

And by the way, the Democrats are favoring a lot of poverty class policies because they know that the right won't fix this, and they see this problem, and it's happening, and are actually playing the long game. As poverty increases, more and more voters will favor Democrat policies.

I admit I was high when I wrote this. But that doesn't make any of those questions or points invalid. I'd genuinely like to hear your position on it.

imgflip users advocating a decreasing population