Hey if Democrats are always gonna make extremely ridiculous comments about the right then back at you.

😆 math is racist

HAHAHA

Their population?

Not sure where you’re getting 5 times. I was under the impression you’d be upset they’re having any at all.

Regardless, despite their high abortion rate, their overall population has continued to grow 1% of the total US population each decade since 1970.

“As for the other two groups, Whites have around half as many as their population percentage dictates, and Blacks have more than 3x as many as their population percentages dictates.

My claim of ‘5 times as many’ was a conservative estimate.”

Actually that would be a liberal estimate… because you overshot.

“If an abortion is due to rape, incest, or will physically harm the mother, I have no problem with it.”

Congratulations. You’re not an asshole.

“Who the fûck mentioned anything about their population growth? Let me look…the answer is NOBODY.”

Okay, maybe an asshole. I mentioned it. Do you have a problem with facts or something?

“Now imagine if they hadn’t been killing off their babies (or each other) for the last fifty years.”

Black on black crime is just as high as white on white crime. I see no point in including each other in an any exclusive context.

It would seem to me the problem is poverty. Which isn’t easy when there is also a disproportionate number in prison sentences among black Americans.

"It’s as valid as you bringing up their population growth."

Your communication skills are lacking.

I'm asking what IS your valid point that “a group that makes up 15% of the population has as many instances of violent crime as the group that makes up 60% of the population”?

What point is that, exactly?

No, what is your valid point about “a group that makes up 15% of the population has as many instances of violent crime as the group that makes up 60% of the population”?

You believe it’s normal for 15% of the population to make up 60% of the prison population?

I dunno, that seems mighty suspect. Given the extraordinary proportions, it’s much more likely that there are more instances of injustices than Justice at play here.

And I wouldn’t be so quick to call it all violent crime when about only about 60% of the total black prison population have committed violent crimes.

"OMG.

I said my first comment had a typo, but you’re taking numbers and putting them in categories that they don’t belong in.

Let’s try one more time, but I’ll use more accurate numbers:

Blacks make up 13.4% of the population.
They also get 38.9% percent of the abortions. That’s 2.902x the abortions than their population percentage.

Whites make up 58.9% of the population. They also get 31.7% of the abortions. That’s 0.538x the abortions than their population percentage.

2.902 = 290.2%
0.538 = 53.8%
290.2% is 5.394 times more than 53.8%

My percentage conversions are not irrelevant and my math is correct.

I said it was 5x as many, when it is actually 5.394x, so my original statement of it being a conservative estimate was right."

Actually you said "I don’t want a simple error confusing the entire issue." and deleted your original comment with said error which is still visible in the reply.

You stated 3x0.5 = 6, 5>6... So that was the error you were referring to. This is the first time you mentioned a typo in regards to your first post, but have stated you had a (meaning singular) error in a previous post... you had two.

Are you now retconning that you meant to say 0.5 x as many instead of 5x many? You would think one would say they meant to say HALF instead of 0.5 if they did. So I don't believe you had a typo but were merely called out and are now ridiculously backpedaling and moving goal posts. Nor did you attempt to trade 0.5 to 5 until after I called it a liberal estimate.

Which you go on to repeat here with the so-called typo again.

"My claim of ‘5 times as many’ was a conservative estimate."

Again, you did not say 0.5 until you were corrected and are taking some infantile stance over your overestimation.

Whether your math is correct or not is irrelevant as well. (it wasn't, but it's getting better. I know we had this same argument over percentages and decimals in regards to covid cases. You were wrong there, too.)

It's irrelevant because they only are being used to justify you can do math, after showcasing a failure to do so.

And now you’re just copy and pasting instead of explaining what 5 times what is.

We know it’s not abortions as it’s confirmed that blacks only have 1.2 times as many abortions as whites.

So your 5 times is a liberal estimate.

But do go on copying and pasting.

It makes your argument so much more credible.

“But go on trying to say that 5x is a liberal estimate when it is lower than the 5.394x it actually is.”

But it isn’t.

Whites get 31.7% abortions while blacks got 38.9%

38.9 divided by 31.7 equals 1.2

So blacks only get 1.2 times more abortions than whites.

5.394 times isn’t anything close to the correct estimate. Liberal or otherwise.

(P.S. You never answered what 5 times what is. As I assume it was 5 times more than whites, which I just proved was wrong with very simple math, your ongoing copy/pastes and fraction and percentage conversions remain irrelevant. And yes, they are a waste of your time. Especially when you’re wrong.)

“But go on trying to say that 5x is a liberal estimate when it is lower than the 5.394x it actually is.”

But it isn’t.

Whites get 31.7% abortions while blacks got 38.9%

38.9 divided by 31.7 equals 1.2

So blacks only get 1.2 times more abortions than whites.

5.394 times isn’t anything close to the correct estimate. Liberal or otherwise.

All you had to do was explain where you got 5 times as many. Instead you got defensive, sputtered conversions to explain your estimates before finally remembering you meant black people get 5 times many abortions as white people in relation to each of their respective population.

Which I don’t think you actually said, and lead to my initial question; which I was finally able to get through your calculations.

And while I appreciate the accuracy and showing your work, I would rather you state your conclusions rather than leaving what 5 times actually was…

Given it had been stated that blacks have 1.2 times more abortions than white people, then 3 times as many as their population dictates and etc.

Better.

Still, that doesn’t explain how you originally said 5 times as much when it was 3 times.

5 > 3… so it was a liberal estimate.

How are they not relevant?

"“…done little to impact the overall population growth…”

Do you really think that millions of aborted black babies would have had ‘little impact’ on the population?"

Yes. They're still growing and are not stagnant nor decreasing. That is what little impact means. It doesn't mean zero, it means little.

It was relevant given the OP’s claim that abortion is being used as population control over black people, while abortion has done little to impact the overall growth of the black population.

First, 3 x 0.5 = 1.5.

Second 5 < 6.

Third… you first stated it to 5 times, now stating it’s 3 times.

5 > 3… so it was a liberal estimate.

Except you never said 0.5 x higher.

You said 5.

“And if 34% (it’s actually 37%) of abortions are from less than 15% of the population, that means they are getting 5x as many as their population should be.”

Your percentage conversions are irrelevant. You were just wrong.

You said it was 5 times as many when it was 3 times as many. You overestimated. And therefore we’re liberal in your guess.

Don’t sweat it. Being liberal in your numbers doesn’t necessarily make you politically liberal.

Nope. Lack of fathers.

You guys define everything by skin color except when it’s inconvenient.

And of course you blame white privilege for all those ills. Nice how your little narrative always works in your favor. 15% has 34% of the abortions because that’s who it’s targeted for by the left.

hmmm, lemme check.
Actually that's you who just did that. TWICE.

⏺️ "Modda

Poverty levels seem be the biggest factor, as well as age, marital status,,,"

▶️ "Bluessol

You guys define everything by skin color except when it’s inconvenient."

⏺️ "Modda

"Poverty levels seem be the biggest factor, as well as age, marital status,,," is a skin color to you? Did you get that from Joe Biden's autobiography?"

▶️ "Bluessol

And of course you blame white privilege for all those ills. Nice how your little narrative always works in your favor. 15% has 34% of the abortions because that’s who it’s targeted for by the left."

Are you confused to whom you're replying to or is it just to yourself yet again as always?
You CAN scroll up if you need to clarify things to yourself.

You’re the one who is easily confused. Maybe it’s all those alts you have to run to feel supported and safe.

Do you really require a repost of your confusion? It's right above your comment, can't be that hard to miss yet again. How confusing can that possibly be?

And around it goes

At least I can admit when I was wrong.

You were very wrong here and chose to just troll.

That’s not the sign of an independent thinker.

But it is the sign of a hypocritical fool with just a dash of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

That’s just pathetic.

Democrats want to keep black people on the democrat plantation