In other words people just don't trust the government.

Democrats insisted on executing a civil war, showing their willingness to murder their fellow citizens to keep their slaves.

Now, they have crippled many police departments, and are in the process of scaring off all legitimate patriots in the military. They seem to be trying to turn this country into the Wild West, either through race wars, or class wars, but clearly, they want more guns out there than ever before.

I suppose one way to destroy America's sovereignty is to create a scenario where Democrats can justify calling in an outside military force to quell the "uprising". And the useful idiots that support them? They believe that January 6th was a real insurrection.

Quite the imagination you have there

I never said I believed that January 6th was an actual insurrection- the imagination is all yours.

Which, of course, is no surprise at all.

Civil War wasn't about slavery it was about states rights. If the federal government had compensated the slave owners for their losses they would have voluntarily freed the slaves themselves.

OK, so we're agreed that the Democrats were holding human beings as slaves for their own profit.

And in a way, it was about "States' Rights"- Democrat states "right" to make other people slaves merely for the color of their skin. The only place you will find that the Civil War was primarily about something other than slavery is sitting in front of a liberal teacher- the writings of the time say otherwise. While we can find Democrats of the time trying to couch their evil in "States' Rights", they were liars then, just as they are liars today.

Democrats, then as now, LOVE to divide people by whatever means possible. They gave us segregation, Jim Crow laws, the KKK, and the Civil War.

Disagree with them? RaCiST!! Still disagree with them? WhItE SuPrEmAcISt!!!! Want to justify murdering your own baby because you just wanna live your best life? "It'S jUsT a CLumP oF CeLLs!!!

You missed the point. No where in the constitution was the federal government given the power to determine anything about slavery. It had to be amended to free the slaves. They didn't do that originally, they just passed a federal law. They could have avoided civil war if they had done it properly.

"They could have avoided civil war if they had done it properly."

I think you underestimate the evil of the Democrat Party. They have been lawbreakers from the beginning, and still are. The Rule of Law is a joke to them.

In other words, passing laws has never stopped them. When they formed the KKK and tortured and murdered people, there were already laws on the books regarding that- didn't stop them. And it is the same today. Democrats want to pass more gun laws, which their constituents will ignore those in the same way they ignore the 20,000~ gun laws already on the books.

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

The illegality of slavery is certainly implied in the very purpose for the Constitution in the first place. Not unlike every doctrine that is taught in legitimate churches, such doctrines had to be defined in order to deal with errant teachings. So too with the Constitution- errant behavior not originally specifically mentioned had to be addressed. In most cases, for both situations, the errors come from liberals.

And this is also much like the liberal's stance on abortion. Every rational human being understands that life begins at conception. They know they cannot win the debate by saying that some lives should not be protected, so they play around with labels in order to dehumanize the unborn life. And the extreme ruling on Roe v Wade is one of the best examples of how low they will sink to do so. They found the "right" to murder their own children in the "penumbra" that emanates from somewhere behind the actual words of the Law of the Land. They have long known that without an activist ruling like RvW, that if the issue of abortion was decided where it should be, at the citizen level, they would lose much of what they have been clinging to.

Such insanity is difficult to understand- they are fighting like rabid dogs for the "right" to murder their own children, primarily for financial reasons. Which brings us full circle to why they fought to preserve slavery- financial reasons.

And evil.

I agree with most of that.