Never ask a woman her age

Because pushing their ideology to confused people about who they are is greater than money. It's a primary stepping stone on the way to merging humans with A.I. (look to WEF and Klaus Schwab to their ideas for humanity). It will be much easier for people to accept: 'Hey, if I can pick my own gender, why not be a robot?'

That first sentence says it all.

Back up to that middle part. . .then why the hell are nosy women asking me how much I made every payday?

They're gold diggers.

Or closest feminists.

Gold Diggers is the more likely one.

Ah yes, the company that platformed transphobic comedians and stood by them when they received backlash from their own employees is hemorrhaging money for...

*Checks notes*

Being too woke.

Netflix is the company that gave us Cuties and then tried to defend it, gave us that godawful She-Ra Reboot, race swapped Ciri in the Witcher, gave us the Woke live action Cowboy Bebop reboot, race swapped a major character on the CGI Saint Saiya remake despite the original havin' strong female characters, race swapped and gender swapped the last pagan king of Norway, and greenlit the live action adaptation of He's Expecting instead of adaptations of thousands of better manga.

Since when are conservatives going to let facts get in the way of their rich and fulfilling fantasy lives?

Says the asshole who defends Groomers and Facebook.

Groomers, huh?

Would that be like the husband of a sitting Representative that exposed himself to girls?

Or would that be the sitting Representative that's currently being investigated for paying to have a minor moved across state lines he could have sex with her? Oh, and pay her too?

Groomers like Bobert and Gaetz?

Or maybe you mean like former speaker Dennis Hastert?

Like him?

Maybe you should start demanding that the actual groomers and pedos in the Republican party resign?

If Bobert, Gaetz, and Dennis Hastert were groomers and pedos, they'd be behind bars right now. Same for the other two people you mentioned. Like all Democrats, you accuse Republicans of what your side is doin'. It was the Left that opposed the Parental Rights Bill, not the Republicans. It was Joe Biden who nominated a Judge who was lenient towards Pedophiles to the f**kin' Supreme Court.

You mean like these guys are?

Hastert served 13 months in jail, and Bobert went to jail for 2 days (and was given probation for 2 years). Gaetz is currently being investigated.

I am not accusing. I am stating facts.

Hard. Facts.

Not your feelings and what you've been told to believe.

Facts.

Justice Brown was not "lenient in pedos." That was a made-up fantasy pushed by the GQP in an attempt to stop her appointment to the court. And you fell for it.

And this "Parental Rights Bill" is just another paranoid fantasy from the Right. The GQP keeps going on and on about pedos and grooming... yet they shield the pedos and their enablers within the party.

Look at Rep Jim Johnson. Covered up sexual abuse at the school he worked at.

Every accusation the Republican party makes is really just a confession.

Hard facts are there is no dearth of politicians of both sides who have been accused and some convicted of immoral acts. Any Republican you name could be matched by a democrat politician.

As should Democrats who claim to have better morals. Politicians are mostly an immoral group regardless of their party affiliation.

It’s the Dems that want to groom kindergartners and promote transgender and gay lifestyles to them.

Wrong. Justice Brown gave a man who was charged, arrested, and found guilty of possessin' child porn less than the minimum sentence. That's leniency towards Pedos. Gaetz is bein' investigated, but bein' investigated does not equate to guilt, especially when it's done by the FBI. The same FBI that ignored Hillary's illegal server but went after Trump because of a f**kin' lie. If the Republicans did shield pedos and enablers, Hastert and Bobert wouldn't have been convicted in the first f**kin' place. The allegations against Jim Johnson haven't been proven, which means that allegations are all you have. The Parental Rights Bill ain't paranoid fantasy, as lesson plans that involves discussin' sexuality with kids (which they shouldn't be concerned about at that age) and tellin' 'em not to tell their parents proves that the Teachers Unions are Groomin' are kids.

Judges Bianco and Brasher and Carl Nichols - ALL TRUMP APPOINTEES to the circuit appeals courts- have sentenced child porn offenders less than the minimum sentencing guidelines.

So...

I guess that means once again the GOP is not only harboring pedos and groomers but promoting them?

That only proves that Trump appointed three closet RINOs to Appeals Courts.

uh huh.Yeah. That's it.

Smart money says that you, Modda, and Whistlelock are usin' a few bad apples to smear Republicans. Smart money also says that Democrats are the party of "Rules For Thee, None For Me". Why else would Whistlelock bring up Bianco and Brasher and Carl Nichols (all RINOs) givin' child porn offenders light sentences, yet claim that KBJ, who also gave child porn offenders less than the minimum sentence, bein' lenient on Pedos is a myth?

They are so desperate to be marginalized.

Ironic that you have the Confederate Flag on Robin Hood's rags, considerin' that the Democrats created both the Confederacy and the Ku Klux Klan.

Weird how it shows up a GOP rallies and the conservatives are fighting to keep the Confederacy statues.

Republicans are tryin' to preserve the history that is bein' destroyed when the Confederate statues are removed, especially when it's done by an angry mob. Not to mention that the decision to take down a Confederate Statue is always made without the townsfolk havin' a say in the matter. As for a few Southerners wavin' a Confederate flag at GOP rallies, that's just a few Southerners wavin' a Confederate flag.

My point is that you used the Confederate flag to paint Republicans as racist when you're a member of the party of Jim Crow and the Ku Klux Klan, both of which were created after the Confederacy (which was founded by slave ownin' Democrats) was defeated.

There was no Party Switch. The Democrats just changed their tune, goin' from bein' the Party Of Slavery to bein' the Party Of Jim Crow to bein' the Party Of Bad Policies. Orval Faubus, the Democratic Governor of Arkansas, ordered the National Guard to block the Little Rock Nine from goin' to school in defiance of the Supreme Court. Bull Connor, a Democrat, authorized the use of dogs and firehouses against the Civil Rights Movement. George Wallace tried to block desegregation. Joe Biden, who is currently in the White House, referred to desegregated schools as "Racial Jungles". JFK supported the Civil Rights Movement, but he was an outlier. Republicans voted in favor of the Civil Rights Bill and the only Democrat who defected to the Republicans made an about face on the issue of Civil Rights.

Truth is not your friend is it trigger

Southern Democrats put them up. Get a grip. You realize it’s not 1865 right?

Them are all Southies, fella.

Truman was a Democrat who desegragated the Military and introduced a Civil Rights plank in the 1948 DNC Conventions, starting a mass exodus of Southerners who first tried creating their own Dixiecrat splinter before joining the GOP when that failed.

JFK supported the Civil Rights Movement? Yeah, just kept doing nothing about it, leaving it all to LBJ to do, who pushed through the Civil Rights Bill, despite the efforts of Southies.

Truman, like JFK, was an outlier. Nothin'. JFK was prepared to federalize the Alabama National Guard if need be and his Administration got more heavily involved with the negotiations between the white business community and the SCLC. As for the "Southies", bein' from the South does not change the fact that they were Democrats.

JFK was a friggin manipulative liar who screwed over so many people with his unkept 'promises' that the list of people who wanted to kill him is pages long! From the Mafia to the CIA and a whole mess of others, the question is more who DIDN'T want him dead. Who tha heck cuts deals with mobsters to get elected? Not even Trump with Giuliani was able to do that, AND THEY'RE FROM NYC!

That's the point, Kennedy was prepared to do a lot of things. He just never did them becuse he was too busy humping Marilyn and whomever else in the Lincoln room. And his crooked family is trying to give him the credit for LBJ doing it all instead. JOHNSON! That's like the Anti-Christ saying, "Yeah, Jesus done ditched you 2000 years ago, ya buffoons, so I'm here to keep his promises for ya!"

My folks have been Democrats since the 60s, and they ain't from the South. In fact, if they tried to approach the KKK - never mind join, just walk up to, THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN LYNCHED.

NEWS FLASH: There was NEVER a switch, there have been Republicans in the South since the party began, and even worse. Lily-White Movement. Since the 1880s. Google.

#therewasneveraswitch

Wrong again. Not a big surprise, considerin' that you use Leftist propaganda to perpetuate a myth.

Yeah

Hahaha the parties never switched, that’s how leftists want to tell it.

The parties never switched, that’s a lie. Sorry truth hurts don’t it. Both parties have changed but democrats in the south were anti civil rights as are democrats today. Put on your mask and sit down.

Southern democrats wave it too, just not the woke jokes you are bowing to.

And yet the first amendment protects their right to fly it. Ask them to describe what it means. I bet their interpretation is different than yours. Why does your interpretation take precedent? Thats the point of the first amendment. You don’t have to agree. You somehow believe that everyone has to live by your definition. That makes you a tyrant and a dictator.

I get that your mind requires this issue be overly simplified so you can understand it. Lincoln fought to save the Union and was a Republican that’s a fact.

So, if racists created the Confederacy, the KKK, and the "Confederate" flag (it's not really, but that's a different issue), why would a non-racist want to keep them around in the public square?

We don't have statues to King George nor do we wave British flags around to "remember history." We don't have statues to Hitler. Or Admiral Yamamoto (the admiral who ordered the attack on Pearl Harbor). Texans don't yell "Remember General Santa Anna!"

So, this idea that you're pushing about how you "just want to preserve the history" is bullshit.

Only racist who want to keep the implied threat of slavery around fight to preserve public statues of traitors to the United States. Only racists wave that flag.

And while you may not think you're a racist, the racists proudly displaying those flags think you are.

Time to speak up. Time to demand that symbols of racism and oppression be removed from the public spaces. You want to remember history? Great. So do I. And that's in history books. And museums.

And remind me...who is demanding that kids not be taught about slavery?

Oh, the Republicans in Texas.

Huh.

History Books can be rewritten. Exhibits can be removed from museums. It's called historical revisionism. If that was not the goal of the Left, then they wouldn't be tryin' to rewrite History with the 1619 Project.

Republicans ain't opposed to teachin' kids about slavery. They are opposed to Critical Race Theory, to kids bein' shamed for bein' born White, to teachers sayin' that the White kids in the class are evil and racist because White People owned slaves prior to 1865. There's an obvious difference

Nobody wants a Confederate flag in the public square. The state of Mississippi changed their flag for that reason. However, they were petitioned to do the deed, hence why most Republicans did not make such a big deal about it. You want a statue removed or a flag changed, that's the legal way to do so. The Left, on the other hand, did not go the legal route. Instead, they intimidated Southern politicians into havin' the Confederate statues removed or violently tore them down.

If the goal of the left was to remove symbols of oppression, why did they not remove statues of Lenin, whose regime killed anyone who did not support their revolution, yet tore down statues of the Foundin' Fathers, who were responsible for freein' America from British Tyranny. If the goal of the Left was to remove symbols of racism, then why did they tear down statues of Abe Lincoln, who freed the slaves, and Fredrick Douglas, an African American who was an avid supporter of abolition?

Hitler ordered the deaths of millions of Jews and Gypsies. That is why there are no statues of him. The soldiers and generals who served in the Confederate Army, on the other hand, served honorably, despite the leaders of the nation they fought for bein' founded and led by slave owners. When you tear down a statue, you remove their stories, both the good and the bad.

Wrong. You're a Pinko who spends too much time on Twitter.

Why did they not remove statues of Lenin from where? What part of Russia do you live?

There are cities in the US that have statues of Lenin

The statue of Lenin is in Seattle of course. Modda wouldn’t know that because he never leave his borough in New York.

100% C O R R E C T

Nice try, Vlady, nice try,,,

Nope. It's typical Leftist mental gymnastics.

Says the libtard who doesn't hesitate to cancel someone over a ten-year-old Tweet.

Gotta preserve history by protecting shitty statues that were propped up in the 50s and 60s but god forbid schools teach kids about slavery.

There's a difference between teachin' kids about slavery and tellin' White kids that they're inherently evil and racist because White People owned slaves prior to 1865.

Wrong. See the above comment.

I'll take shit that doesn't happen for 500.

You're now at -1000 Points. If Mental Gymnastics were an Olympic Sport, you'd have won a Gold Medal for that comment.

If a white person feels persecuted learning real American history, that's entirely on them.

Facts don't care about your feelings.

Yet you want to keep the statues of what you call evol Demoncratz (despite there being no Democrats in the Confederacy) up that make those poor victims of being identified as slavery supporters up?

First off, it's spelled evil. Second, the Democrats founded the Confederacy. The Democrats opposed the abolition of slavery. Southern Democrats were the ones who wanted to negotiate peace with the Confederacy. The Ku Klux Klan was founded by Democrats. If there were no Democrats in the Confederacy, then why the Hell did the Democrats politically dominate the South after the Civil War? Read a history book. Third, I am fine with statues of Jefferson Davis and the other slave owners who founded the Confederacy removed, so long as it is done legally. Not by intimidatin' politicians or by an angry mob, but by petitionin' Mayors and Governors.

"First off, it's spelled evil."

First off, it's spelled, "evil."

News flash, "evol Demoncratz" was spelled that way because I spelled it that way because I wanteded to.

As for the rest, hey, I'm all for standing by your lies, but historical ignorance is no excuse.
First off, you don't know diddly about Dixie history,
Second off, if you hate it so, why do you want to celebrate it in effigy and against the wishes of the public in public spaces, no less?

No, it was not.

Still a few southerners wavin' a Confederate Flag, asshole.

Those are some fine upstanding gents serving as gleaming examples of the wonderous aspects of genetic distillation waving your traitor flag, aren't they?

Well, just some of them, and on both sides!

Hey, that template's great, btw

"But Dolfald Trumpler denounced him after only two weeks of heavy pressure from even his own handlers!"

I ask the same question about you.

No, they did not.

Yes, they did. Read the damn history books.

No, they did not

The South has changed. Its values have changed. Southerners care more about a candidate's policies than somethin' as superficial as skin color.

They don't. Southerners do. Racist Southerners. And, taking their cue even in Canada now, racists throughout America do.

I've known plenty of Republicans, and I've not seen a Confederate flag in my entire life anywhere but on the screen and in books. Not even a bumper sticker, nothing. Frig, I've even seen the flag of the Isle of Man of all places at a house, but never a Confederate one in the flesh. I've seen and lived near actual White Southerners as well - a family used to live around the block when I was a kid even. No Confederate flags though.

Republicans have always been racist, you know, like people tend to be, only most don't go around lynching people. Look at St Jesus White Savior of Slaves Lincoln's own words. This wasn't some secret side, this was typical of the times.

Segregation, mind you, wasn't restricted to the South, it was throughout the US before, nay, Canada too, oh, and Mexico, even Puerto Rico, where my mother told me of how her family was a member of un "Asociacion" ("Association" in English) which was only for Whites and went to chaparoned balls again, also Whites only. Never mind that it was rather apparent that my grandmother had a degree of Taino features as do my aunt and uncles (albeit only slightly with them. My ma looks more like my grandfather round the eyes), but that stuff was stressed back then, and yet they were nowhere near as racist as folks here.

We moved to an Italian neighborhood in the Bronx when I was 8 - not highly recommended for PRs (as seen on tv!) then. My friends used to say how they were going to become Republicans because they were gonna work Wall Street and wanted to pay taxes. Racist Italian Republicans, not a single Confederate flag anywhere to be seen.

Republicans came about as an abolitionist party, but were also federalists, for big centralized gov't, and favored the gov't backing of business. Sound familiar?

Democrats were more about individualism and State's Rights. Sound familiar?
They have always been more diffused about idealogy than having a central one, thus they've always been more open to change.
As a party they were not pro-slavery per se, they just viewed it as a state issue to be settled at that level, not by the federal goverment. So that's what that rep emerged from.

There was never a party switch, it was only the membership that did. Democrats were open to progress, Republicans were not. Thus those who wanted an ossified monolith flocked to the GOP, because that's conservatism

No, we don't agree.
There is no such thing as a Democrat state or a Republican state. All states have a mixture of those and the other parties and the number of non-registerd to any has been on the rise while the major parties in particular are hemorrhaging members at a rapid clip.

LOOK! More mass evacuations/migrations!

Hey, you might be on to something, an Invasion of the Body Snatchers situ going on might explain the switch in D & R species.... R not always eve existing,,,

"why did u post that 1860 electoral map showing just that?"

The US Presidential Election of 1860 and the Confederacy were 2 different things.

Again. The. Confederacy. did. not. permit. political. parties. hence. they. had. none. period.

"when u say california u think dem, when u say NY u think dem, when u say texas u think republican, when u say utah u think republican, when u say floriduh u think republican..."

No, I don't.
And neither does Arnold Schwarzenegger, George Pataki, Rudy Giuliani, Michael Bloomberg... and my neighborhood. Oh, and Brack Obama in his 2004 DNC Convention speech. And again, last I checked, my parents were never Southern segregationists, although during 4th grade Easter break, we did drive to Florida. So who knows *shrugs shoulders*

Note the year, 1856, and compare this to the 1860 one.
NEWS FLASH: No mass evacuation and migrations required matching the election results.

I kinda get the feeling that you're shilling?

If you can't tell apart a map of the results of an election in the USA from a map of the Union & Confederacy, then that's for you to figure out.

Repeating the same faux confusion repeatedly won't validate the point you're not making no matter how many times you repeat it.

You CAN look these simple facts up. For example, I found out about the Copperhead Democrats and War Democrats factions of the North during the Civil War just last week, and by accident while looking something else up, no less.
You have the advantage in that you already have them to look up. I would suggest that you do so. Likewise with this Democrat or Rebublican State False Dichotomy nonsense. But then again, you already know the answers and this pretend befuddledness is by design. At least I hope it is.

This begins to bore me a lot?

I kinda get the feeling that you're shilling?

If you can't tell apart a map of the results of an election in the USA from a map of the Union & Confederacy, then that's for you to figure out.

Repeating the same faux confusion repeatedly won't validate the point you're not making no matter how many times you repeat it.

You CAN look these simple facts up. For example, I found out about the Copperhead Democrats a War Democrats ust last week, and by accident while looking something else up. You have the advantage in that you already have them to look up. I would suggest that you do so. Likewise with Democrat or Rebublican state nonsense. But then again, you already know the answers and this pretend befuddledness is by design. At least I hope they are.

Simple facts? All you've done is deny that your party was responsible for the Confederacy and the KKK and try to perpetuate a myth that exists to excuse why the Democrats no longer dominate the South.

Who created both the Confederacy and the Ku Klux Klan?

The breakaway states of the South did.

The Confederacy had no parties, Jefferson Davis forbade it from its inception. It's just that simple. The Democrats wouldn't have created the Confederacy just to exclude themselves from their own entity.

In fact, Democrats cleaved over the issue of slavery, with a northern splitoff fielding their own separate candidate for the 1860 Election, as seen on the map. Even further, the northern faction split during the war, War Democrats favoring Lincoln's military policy, Copperheads were against.

BUT WAIT! THERE'S MORE! The Border States. Southern Slave States which stayed with the Union instead of joining the Confederacy. They were allowed to keep their slaves. By Lincoln. He even exempted them from his bogus unenforcable hypocritical Emancipation Proclamation.

Likewise, the Ku Klux Klan was founded by Southerners, ex Confederate soldiers. They didn't polish off their party registration cards to do it.

Arguing within the lying parameters of these MAGAt lies does nothing but reinforce them. "Yeah, maybe, but things changed in 1964, A DANG CENTURY LATER! so now they're different" doesn't dispute the lie, it VERIFIES it.

There was never a switch.

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. The South broke away because Democrats, who politically dominated the South and supported the creation of new slave states, were pissed over Lincoln, an abolitionist, winnin' the 1860 Election. The Ku Klux Klan was created by Democrats after the Civil War. If they weren't, then why did they seek to overthrow Republican state governments in the South. As for the Border States, the reason they were excluded from the Emancipation Proclamation (which was enforced by Union Soldiers seizin' plantations as they marched deeper into Confederate territory) was that outlawin' Slavery in those states would've caused those states to join the Confederacy, effectively cuttin' off important supply lines (one of the reasons the Confederacy lost was that the Union had better logistics).

Um, wrong.
Kindly read the oother posts.

Wrong. The Democrats of the past wouldn't line up with me. Nobody wants a return to slavery and no Republican wants to bring back Jim Crow.

Jim Crow 2.0? There is nothin' racist about makin' it harder for Democrats to stuff the ballot box. In fact, you're the damn racist for assumin' that African Americans can't get an ID. You must have your head buried deep in the sand under that rock you're livin' under if you think that the 2020 Election bein' stolen is a "conspiracy theory" when the evidence that has been found since the 2020 Election proves that Trump was the legitimate winner.

Spare us the Leftist Propaganda and go back to Twitter.

Triggered? Last time I checked, Republicans weren't the ones screamin' at the top of their lungs about Elon Musk buyin' Twitter.