"So you get to tell someone else what they are or aren't?"
As usual, you misunderstand how reality works. I don't get to decide anything- their actions/viewpoints reveal who they are. While I could always be wrong, expressing an opinion based on the evidence is not telling anyone who they are/are not. And you are being petty and infantile to not see the difference.
Kind of how liberals try and portray themselves as the compassionate ones, while murdering unborn children for the fun of it, and then trying to dehumanize the unborn to assuage their guilty consciences. And their general approach to handling the US border, illegal aliens, social policy, monetary policy, etc., has a proven track record of failure- there is nothing compassionate about any of that. Many predicted the economic scenario we are in currently, in 0bama's 3rd Term, and there is nothing compassionate about record high inflation, which harms the poorest the most.
As with any movement, political, ideological, religious/spiritual, they are rarely monolithic, but there are still generally accepted traits that are good markers.
You, for instance, possess the markers of today's liberalism: nasty, combative, basically stalking those whose viewpoints you hate, hatred of God, hatred of the Constitution- especially Free Speech, hatred of good, love of that which God hates- things which also naturally harm a society, etc. No one would ever be confused about which side you represent- your words and actions are there for all to see. Does me calling you a liberal make you one, or does the views you hold make it so?
This medium is, at best, imprecise, given how 80%+ of communication comes in the form of non-verbal queues, but given enough time and enough examples, much is revealed. Unfortunately, when some of us speak openly of what is revealed, we find our comments censored.
Some people do not like how they look in the light of day, metaphorically speaking.
And with little wonder why . . .