Imgflip Logo Icon

Public Service Announcement

Public Service Announcement | FRIENDLY REMINDER; THE PEOPLE 
TAKING YOUR 
FREEDOMS AWAY 
ARE NOT
REPUBLICANS | image tagged in mandates | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1,199 views 88 upvotes Made by AvgJoe 2 years ago in politics
31 Comments
10 ups, 2y,
2 replies
Obviously. Though Liberal side wants to push or make Republicans look like bad guys despite Democrats having oppose every Major Civil Rights movement in history since its founding in 1829 and has a long history of discrimination.

People tend to forget Republican party was made in 1854 as an anti-slavery party. Republicans also fought for civil rights for black people after slavery was abolish. Who started the KKK? Democrat party member Nathan Bedford Forrest.

President Woodrow Wilson also shared many views of the Klan and he too was a democrat. He made the movie 'Birth of the Whitehouse' which was also originally known as 'The Clansman'

1964 Democrats fought against the Civil Rights Act and forced it into a delay, before Republicans got enough notes to get it to pass.

You might be wondering.. 'Well yea, that is all in past.'

But is it? I mean.. Biden is pretty racist too today. He nominated a woman on Supreme Court primary for her color(and probably also mainly due to her leniency to pedos, but that is another story.) He sign into effect outlawing lynching to appease woke media. I mean.. Lynching was a Democrat thing, but I digress. Most notably the way he speaks. Ah.. What was it? That time during Presidential Election? I do recall him telling black voters if they vote for Trump, then they weren't black and later apologizing for it.. But I mean... Really? Oh that is just recent episodes too. You can forget what he said much later in military about certain kids that got him that glare/mean-mug look from that African American Soldier. Even much prior to that in his younger days he oppose sending his kids to public school with color people cause he called it a Racial Jungle.
3 ups, 2y
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Discrimination is more of a Liberal thing. Apparently you didn't read or blatantly ignoring stuff Biden been doing.

I bet you support Transgenders in Women's sports too. Which is discriminating already to women if so. (Transgenders should have their own sport division to compete in, but I digress, that would make sense.)

I hope you aren't going to justify the passing of Florida Bill as Discrimination either.
2 ups, 2y,
3 replies
It is liberal, thank you for saying so!

I do not support transgenders in women’s sports. I’m not an “either or” type of person. Maybe you are. I would agree to transpeople having their own division. That does make a kind of sense. But right now, those people are a minority in that category and may not be afforded even that opportunity so I cannot support outright denial of their ability to compete WITHOUT providing them an alternative.

The Parental Rights in Education law is discriminatory. Just because Democrats passed hundreds if not more discriminatory laws does not change that fact.
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Fry is not sure... | So you'd be fine with high school kids competing against elementary school kids. | image tagged in fry is not sure | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
Nice strawman. Here is why it fails.

I believe my argument in terms of unfair advantage of transwomen in women's sports was:

"I do not support transgenders in women’s sports." and "I cannot support outright denial of their ability to compete WITHOUT providing them an alternative."

Since high school kids have their own schools apart from elementary schools... under my parameters for requiring for opportunities; it is impossible to conclude I would be fine with such a thing.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
1 up, 2y
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
It is not discriminatory. The bill was established to prevent sexualize talk or gender identity K - 3. It should be common sense that such should not be addressed to a class of young kids to begin with.

It was made to protect children as at that age their mentality is not well develop to fully comprehend such things.

It is simple. People don't want kids at those age ranges learning about heterosexuals themes, surely they don't want them learning about homosexual things either. Let children grow and develop or reach a puberty age where such information should be better divulge to them.
2 ups, 2y
If they are not old enough to comprehend, then why ban the subject of orientation or identity to protect them?

But we do discuss “heterosexual” themes with children without going into explicit detail. And yes, I find this most interesting that the law deems this completely inappropriate no matter the orientation. Which means that students cannot discuss their parents or their feelings with the teacher without the teacher throwing up a social wall around themselves in terms of discussion. We already have such legislation in regards to politics and religion which I believe to also be absurd. Now we cannot discuss with young children why some of their peers have two moms, and two dads, and not just from separated families. In fact, we cannot discuss families at all by then laws vagueness or overreaching policy.

The discrimination factor comes more in the form of gender identity. But I digress, limiting the freedom of speech of individuals based on senseless and victimless reasons will not allow the law to continue to stand constitutionally.

The mere fact that people continue to say this law isn’t about discrimination but protecting students from discussing implicit sexual acts, when the bill does not do this (because it would be redundant given this is already law) proves there is a deceitful nature to the bill’s intent.
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
Wait, you think parents SHOULDN'T know what they are teaching their own children?!?!?
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
They absolutely should! And there is no school board that I know of that would dare prevent them from knowing that.

Having said that, parents shouldn’t dictate the curriculum. If they did, then all their precious little snowflakes would have participation trophies. Excuse me, straight As.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
"They absolutely should!"
Sooo then you DO support this new FL law!

"And there is no school board that I know of that would dare prevent them from knowing that."
You need to get over yourself- your range of experience is clearly limited, given the hurdles that parents are having to jump just to be heard by their local school boards. Have you seen the video where they cut the mic as the parent was reading from an approved book? You are not all-knowing after all? Another idol comes crashing down- 2022 just plain sucks!

"Having said that, parents shouldn’t dictate the curriculum."
This is a Constitutional Republic- the government is ours, therefore, the schools are ours. Parents most certainly should dictate the curriculum.

"If they did, then all their precious little snowflakes would have participation trophies. Excuse me, straight As."
Dictating the curriculum is not the same thing as dictating the testing process, nor the accountability factor. But that was one of the most beautiful non sequiturs I have seen in some time.
1 up, 2y,
1 reply
“Sooo then you DO support this new FL law!”

No, because I can support parents knowing what teachers their students without discriminatory laws.

“Have you seen the video where they cut the mic as the parent was reading from an approved book?”

This law would not have prohibit that book that she read because that was a middle school. And I said, parents should not dictate curriculum. So, your points are moot.

“Parents most certainly should dictate the curriculum.”

No, they should not. Otherwise liberal parents would be saying math is racist, or fundamentalists would suppress teaching evolution, and everyone wants to re-write history. No, at some point someone has to do right by the kids and preparing children for the real world is a responsibility. One not taken lightly nor is the pay satisfactory despite the years of qualifications it takes to secure that kind of job!

As I said, parents should not dictate curriculums, then all their precious little snowflakes would have participation trophies. And nothing more.

“Dictating the curriculum is not the same thing as dictating the testing process, nor the accountability factor.”

But the curriculum is the foundation of the testing. So it absolutely does. There is no point in setting a standard if parents want a buffet of choices in terms of what a public school is.

I honestly don’t know what your point is other than you have a very low opinion of public schools.

And you know what? That’s a reasonable opinion. I just disagree with your reasons.
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
So you also hide behind the liberal mods, getting comments deleted you cannot handle?
0 ups, 2y,
1 reply
I’m genuinely sorry your comments got deleted.

Stick to facts and less name calling and you’ll go far without mod interference.

Hence why I don’t bother with petty analysis of people I reply to. I tried to steer you back to the argument and not myself.

You can do better.

Your words and ideas matter.

So do mine.
0 ups, 2y
Unfortunately for my comments, but fortunately for my integrity, I do not submit to the liberal definition of "name-calling", nor of their interpretation of what constitutes harassment and insults.

As I pointed out in the one comment, you do much the same, albeit with more subtlety. While that would be a good tactic to learn, I am not interested in the subterfuge required to accomplish this.

I took a closer look at whom the mods for this stream are- one appears to be remotely conservative based on their memes, all appear to be children, relatively speaking. I have no plans on changing my approach based on the opinions of those lacking life experience.

You claim to be a republican conservative. There was nothing in my replies to you that deserved shutting down Free Speech. Aside from making real threats, there should be no such censorship. If you were truly a conservative, you would know this.
5 ups, 2y,
1 reply
good one ..you should share this template
3 ups, 2y
Thanks. Here’s the template imgflip.com/memegenerator/381612298/Sign-girl
4 ups, 2y,
1 reply
It never is
3 ups, 2y
2 ups, 2y
Don't trust any politician!!!
2 ups, 2y,
1 reply
What the left sells is the idea that the government offers things to the people. But what they actually do is empower the government itself and make the people dependent on that power, the government and the deep state, represented in multiple private corporations. And within the right there are people who want the same as the left. Simply having power and taking freedoms away from people.
3 ups, 2y,
1 reply
You’re not wrong.

There are Republicans who sell, “the idea that the government offers things to the people. But what they actually do is empower the government itself and make the people dependent on that power, the government and the deep state, represented in multiple private corporations.”

Republicans have been doing this for decades to appeal to fundamentalist groups and keep private corporations in power by way of tax exemptions and funneling money that should be going into public schools into private schools.

Everyone knows the purpose of private schools, charter schools, is to continue discriminatory and segregated polices and keep fundamentalists groups happy. Even if it sacrifices individual constitutional rights.

This money keeps those apathetic politicians in power. Criminalizing senseless and petty things into the prison industrial complex for cheap labor or worse keep undesirables out of society rather than rehabilitate them back into functioning society.

Keeping the rich rich and the poor worse. Using the middle-class and conditioning to fear these undesirables no matter how worse things get. Because when things get worse, they search for a new problem and use that to get elected, pass discriminatory bills, rinse and repeat. Decades later, we say those bills caused todays problems and get repealed. If not by conscience then by constitutional review. And we just say, oh well. Like no one warned us that this would happen.

But people did.

And we called them woke, liberals, traitors, hippies, and other non-sensical names. At the time. But in the end, they were right. But we move on to the next debate. Never caring about what we lost or what was gained. The cycle repeats and we continue to blame people for not having morals or being accountable to societal norms despite those norms frequently being looked back on in shame if not completely dismissed or forgotten.
2 ups, 2y
Everyone should read this:
"Political Ponerology: A Science on the Nature of Evil Adjusted for Political Purposes"
[deleted]
0 ups, 2y
Facts my stream is https://imgflip.com/m/BUCKS-MEMES
2 ups, 2y
I was really hoping after the Defense of Marriage Act collapsed that my party would put their discriminatory policies behind them.

I guess I’ll have to go back to being independent.

Shame.
1 up, 2y,
2 replies
5 ups, 2y
3 ups, 2y
No just Rinos.
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
FRIENDLY REMINDER; THE PEOPLE TAKING YOUR FREEDOMS AWAY ARE NOT REPUBLICANS