Its not in there

I agree that these are two different issues, however, they are linked. I'm gonna remember what you said now in about 6 months when the "minor attracted people" aka pedofile movement starts gaining real momentum and the left throws themselves behind that. At that time you are going to change your tune, and I will be there to tell you, told you so. Because whenever the left says something doesn't exist, they will be pushing it soon. See you then.

With that being said, please tell us what your stance on pedofilia is currently

Like the vast majority of people, my stance is that having sex with children is wrong and should be illegal.

Good, I'm very happy to hear you say that. I will hold you to that. As someone who is raising two kids this is issue number one with me. However, I did notice that you simplified that to the extreme and just left it at having sex with children. Please elaborate as to which aspects of pedofilia you do find acceptable.

"However, I did notice that you simplified that to the extreme and just left it at having sex with children"

That's what you were referring to, I assumed

"Please elaborate as to which aspects of pedofilia you do find acceptable"

Are there other aspects?

"I'm gonna remember what you said now in about 6 months when the "minor attracted people" aka pedofile movement starts gaining real momentum and the left throws themselves behind that"

People have tried that for decades and it never gets any mainstream support for obvious reasons

"At that time you are going to change your tune, and I will be there to tell you, told you so"

And I heard a number of conservatives say that if same-sex marriage was legalized, Christians would be thrown in jail for not agreeing with it. There has not being a single case since 2015 of a Christian in the United States being thrown in jail for not agreeing with same-sex marriage. It's always paranoid nonsense.

"Because whenever the left says something doesn't exist, they will be pushing it soon"

Or they say it doesn't exist because it actually doesn't exist

Way to not answer the question

And I hope you're right. We will see

Awesome dodging you just did there!

Right. He boiled down all of pedofilia to simply having sex with children. Which I'm still waiting for a response to. But I'm the one whose dodging here

Except that would pretty much cover it given that that's the core and the rest is basically variations of it.

It's like you're asking if someone is a vegetarian then asking what condiments do they prefer on their burgers. If burgers ain't on their menu, the question is irrelevant.

No, that is just the worst act of it. Explicit photos, sexualized internet messages, touching themselves in public, voyeurism, etc. The answer I am looking for is pedofilia is wrong in all aspects. I'm just making sure he isn't leaving the door open to go back on that if the political winds change.

Um, spare me the details please?

Again, that IS the core of it. The rest simply doesn't exist without it. PERIOD.
Your Stone Soup would-be argument has no - wait for it - foundation.

Oh, and save the Pre-Cog predictions for those who aren't strangers on the web you do not know, k?

Didn't want to list the specifics, but it's an evasive answer. Period. I didn't ask for your input, I'm not even sure if I have seen one of your memes but you always seem to find mine. And I can have any pre conceived notions I want based on my interactions with you. If you stop interjecting yourself, then I probably wouldn't have them. K.

"I'm not even sure if I have seen one of your memes but you always seem to find mine"

Um, who ARE you again?
Heck, the only one that comes to mind when I looked at your name now is kevdex10.
Nothing personal (and I mean NOTHING), you're just another in a lagoon of indistinct Alt Righties here. I'm not exactly keeping a chart to tell apart otherwise identical memers.

Can we call this a wrap? This repetition begins to bore me a lot?

We have this conversation every time. You know nothing about me, but every so often bring up details of other encounters we've had. But yes I too am bored with this. That's a wrap

Hate to rain on your ego, but, um, who are you again, for real?
A look at your profile indicates something of a lack of activity spread thinly over 4 yrs, so hate to say it, but your impact has been somewhat minimal a lot, and that includes on me.

Yup you got me. You have WAY more free time on your hands. Didn't realize just how important you think you are. I don't think I have much of an ego. Seems like you do though. Weren't you getting lost. Like hours ago

All the stuff you listed falls under the "sex with children" umbrella, so yes, all of that is wrong as well and should be illegal

⏹️ "Kevdogg91 0 ups, <1h

Yup you got me. You have WAY more free time on your hands. Didn't realize just how important you think you are. I don't think I have much of an ego. Seems like you do though. Weren't you getting lost. Like hours ago"

▶️ "Kevdogg91 1 up, 4h

Didn't want to list the specifics, but it's an evasive answer. Period. I didn't ask for your input, I'm not even sure if I have seen one of your memes but you always seem to find mine. And I can have any pre conceived notions I want based on my interactions with you. If you stop interjecting yourself, then I probably wouldn't have them. K."

▶️ "Modda 1 up, 4h, 1 reply

"I'm not even sure if I have seen one of your memes but you always seem to find mine"

Um, who ARE you again?"
Heck, the only one that comes to mind when I looked at your name now is kevdex10.
Nothing personal (and I mean NOTHING), you're just another in a lagoon of indistinct Alt Righties here. I'm not exactly keeping a chart to tell apart otherwise identical memers.

Can we call this a wrap? This repetition begins to bore me a lot?"

▶️ "Kevdogg91 1 up, 4h

We have this conversation every time. You know nothing about me, but every so often bring up details of other encounters we've had. But yes I too am bored with this. That's a wrap"

▶️ "Modda 0 ups, 2h, 1 reply

Hate to rain on your ego, but, um, who are you again, for real?
A look at your profile indicates something of a lack of activity spread thinly over 4 yrs, so hate to say it, but your impact has been somewhat minimal a lot, and that includes on me."

I remember first hearing about NAMBLA in the early 80s, thinking it was a sick joke I was missing the punchline on (heard it through the HC Punk scene), then wondering what this world was coming to.
Don't even know if they still exist, but they sure didn't exactly catch on. And I doubt Punkers single handedly stopped them...

A number of pro-pedophilia organizations have existed in the US and other countries. Not a single one has ever gained mainstream acceptance or approval. Most are now defunct.

I tend to avoid the subject, so have no idea what's going on out there other than bumping into the occasional story.

Actually it's been the reverse, with most countries raising marriage and consent ages over the years, as well as illegalizing and prosecuting pedophilia. The more traditional/conservative ones lagging, of course.

Exactly

But conservatives aren't the same everywhere

a Japanese conservative isn't the same as an American one

You're kidding, right?
Bx, NY, NY, USA, remember? I grew up around people with 'old country values' that make these so-called Conservatives here look like the drugged out perverted Hippies that they are.
Did you know the Mullet was once a rad style worn by the likes of Bowie and Punks and whatnot? This was decades before it became a 'traditional' Redneck style, and the rest of them are longhairs since the 70s.
Any fella wanna get freaky with a woman? South and Midwest are where to go. They're actually almost scary, at least in terms of marriage. It's like they have no concept of the word "no." According to an infamous informal poll in the 70s among touring Rock stars, women from Utah were the wildest. On Earth. UTAH!

The only thing 'conservative' about these fakers is their hankering for segregation.