Imgflip Logo Icon

Remember - this virus is soooo bad, it has literally killed less than 1/20 of 1 percent of the population.

Remember - this virus is soooo bad, it has literally killed less than 1/20 of 1 percent of the population. | WE ARE IN A PANDEMIC! YEAH! LOCK US DOWN! HOW BAD?!?! IT'S REALLY REALLY BAD!!! IT HAS KILLED 0.00077 % OF US!! WAIT... WHAT? | image tagged in memes,what do we want 3,covid-19,so you have chosen death | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
874 views 54 upvotes Made by LetsGo_Elect_Brandon_JR 3 years ago in politics
What Do We Want 3 memeCaption this Meme
88 Comments
6 ups, 3y
made w/ Imgflip meme maker
That Fauci is such a liar. In the US the death rate is more like 1.5%
4 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Don't be like Herman Cain:

1 up, 3y
Lol well played
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
THERE IS NO PANDEMIC! MATHEMATICAL SCIENCE: THERE IS NO PANDEMIC.  HERMAN CAIN DIED OF A SMALL VIRUS BASED PROBLEM. | image tagged in herman cain | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
The USA's population is 332,915,073. Not 350,000,000.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
So 332 Mill + 11.2 Mill + two years of easy access illegal immigration... You're right up near 350 Million. But keep trying to split hairs to feel better about being duped into the narrative.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Have you found any data showing how many of these undocumented people are infected or are you just saying that every one of them are in the clear? Also, being close to 350 Million is, in my view, being at 347 million at the bare minimum. Adding 11.2 million to 332 million brings you just past the 344 million mark.
0 ups, 3y
344 + whatever happened in last two years. Easily 347 Million - considering their numbers are what they could observe and doesn't include the fly under the radar. Then in the last two years you had less border security due to covid then Biden's 2021 was the largest influx of illegal immigrants in 40 years.

We are easily right near the 350 Million mark.

Whether or not they have COVID - doesn't matter. They are here and should be included in the calculation.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
You're not counting the 18+ million Illegal Immigrants.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Hmm, I see.....

Proof?
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
https://www.migrationpolicy.org/data/unauthorized-immigrant-population/state/US

In 2019 - we had an estimated 11.2 million. Over the last three years, encounters of illegal immigrants have increased dramatically - 1.6 million this year, with encounters not catching 100% of immigrants, that's easily 2 million illegals that came each year. Especially in 2020 when COVID had short staffed border control agents.

11.2 million + how every many imported in two years - is roughly 350 million people.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Alright, maybe the population is near the 350 million mark. If you ask me, though, I don't think every single undocumented immgrant doesn't have COVID. If you ask me, I believe, once an undocumented person has been found and detained, they should be tested for COVID to make sure they are not at risk of infecting other agents or their own families. Also, I apologize for replying late, I've had things to do this afternoon.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
I feel that way too about testing for covid - but none of the 400 kids in a 260 max limit shelter are being regularly or even imboundedly being tested.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
That is something that should be fixed. Who knows how many of these kids are already sick?
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
It's definitely something the president or vice president should visit and see for themselves, but they've seen pictures and are briefed at least.
0 ups, 3y
Oh, definitely. This should've been fixed the second COVID was discovered in the US back in 2020.
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
More than 824,000 Americans as of today, and we're only at the first part of this surge. 824,000 Americans is about 2 WW2s or 15 Vietnams (only about 1.2 Civil Wars, though).
1 up, 3y
Ok - so US population is 350 Million. 1 percent of that is 3.5 million. 10 percent of that is 350 thousand.

So that's 0.0021 1/5 of 1%.

Which means 99.979% of our population has not died from it.

You sure you're not bought into the scare tactics?
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
0 ups, 3y
True story
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
And that is 60,830.
Even if one person died you should get the vax.
Because nobody's political standing is worth someone's life.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Tell that to the people who got vaxxed and died because of the vaccine. Neat how you want to save lives by vaccine but don't take into account the vaccine does kill people too.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Do you an underlining health condition?
Does you fam have a history of underlining health conditions?
Have you had any surgery's that could change your immune system?
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Yes, I do. So does my mom and dad. And various siblings.

No surgeries. I am not afraid of a vaccine. I'm fully vaxxed. I'm not for scare tactics and narratives that aren't supported by the death toll though. I'm not for mandating vaccines or vaccine passports either.

I'm for freedom of choice. I'm confident my vaccine will help me enough - if I even ever get COVID. There are others who think they can survive covid and probably will according to the death count. That's their perogative.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Then what is your point?
I'm saying that you should get the vaccine to keep others safe.
Expanding on that point, I think the government should try to keep there citizens safe. It wont be perfect but no matter what they must try, nobody has the right to refuse the vaccine and never has.
0 ups, 3y
Everyone has the right to refuse a vaccine. Depending on how authoritarian you prefer to live - different countries will have different outcomes of that choice.

That's my point - freedom of choice. A vaccine was the right choice for me - but not the right choice for my g/f. I've never once tried to make her feel bad about that choice.
3 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Oh, boy are you wrong.

Again, it's killed 0.077% of the world population. Not 0.00077%.

And this tactic to use the entire world population has been used as early as March of 2020 to downplay the severity of the virus. Do you know what that percentage was then? Even smaller. Much smaller.

In fact:

March 2020 we had 3,100 deaths worldwide or 0.00004% of the total population dead.

July 2020 we had 578,935 deaths worldwide 0.0082% of the total population dead. (This is already above where you think we are at 0.00077%)

December 2020 we had 1,588,558 deaths worldwide 0.023% of the total population dead.

March 2021 we had 2,686,183 deaths worldwide 0.038% of the total population dead.

July 2021 we had 3,995,864 deaths worldwide 0.057% of the total population dead.

December 2021 we had 5,249,192 deaths worldwide 0.075% of the total population dead.

Today it's January 2022 and we have 5,460,165 deaths worldwide, 0.078% of the total population dead.

But you don't care. You certainly don't care about the math so why should I expect you to care about 5.5 million people?
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Nah. You are.
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
If the total dead from covid is less than 1/20 of 1% then it would be less than 0.05%.. However, as the virus has killed 77% of 1/1000 of the population it would be 0.077% which is much greater than 0.05% by 0.27%.

7,000,000,000 = 100%

70,000,000 = 1%

1%/20 = 0.05%

So 70,000,000/20 = 3,500,000. Meaning you are saying that only 3.5 million. However, because the number dead when these calculations began was 5.4 million, as you were informed when you made such calculations proves you are still in error.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
I say you're wrong because I'm decimalistically (making up words here) representing it and calling it a percent. Because 0.01 represents 1 percent. 0.001 represents 1/1000 and 0.00077 represents 77 percent of 1/1000th which is what COVID has done.

Percentages can be presented in percentage or in decimal. Each method presented is just as valid.
1 up, 3y,
2 replies
Except 0.077% is also a decimal and a percentage.

0.00077 is just wrong.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
0.00077 is the amount of deaths represented by a decimal. So no it isn't. It's wrong to say 0.00077 percent - because of 1.00 representing 1 percent.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
So, you're admitting you were wrong because you did say 0.00077 percent.

What you should've said, if you wanted to show the decimal percentage was 0.077%.
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
I said that a long time ago... "So I shouldn't have added percent" to my data. But I was representing 1.00 as a Total Population. Not 1 percent of a population. Which means - I'm still right. I just shouldn't have added percent because of how people use the phrase percent.

I should have specifically stated 1.00 represents 1 population. Such that my 0.00077 etc was an accurate setup. But I didn't state that and you've since thought I was wrong - because of how you did the equation.

What I've been saying for awhile now is we are saying the same thing.
0 ups, 3y
Or you could've just said 0.077% was correct. Oops, typo. :D
0 ups, 3y
In most statistical representations, percentages are what we're looking at. Sometimes even percentages with decimals.

Not just decimal value.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
If you look at 1.00 representing 1 population (of 7 Billion) - then 0.00077 is an accurate decimal to represent the deaths.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
0.00077 when converted into percentage is 0.077%.

Which was what you meant because you applied the percentage.
0 ups, 3y,
3 replies
But if 1.00 represents everything - 0.077% percent would be 7.7%. Which is where I got confused. I used 1.00 to represent it all, where your math would use 100.00 to represent it all.

All we did is use different starting points, to come to the same values.
1 up, 3y
Nobody uses 1 to represent a whole.

Only 100%.
0 ups, 3y
It's a lot like saying that you solved the following formula like this:

(54 ÷ 7000) x 100 = ?

YOUR ANSWER: (0.0077) x 100

While correct, it is still incomplete.
0 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Where you got confused is you didn't multiply your final result by 100 to transform the decimal into a percentage.

Then you doubled down on being right despite your simple error.

Now you're saying you don't need to add the percentage modifier if the represented whole is 1 and not 100. Which is still wrong, because in a percentage, 100 is understood to be the whole percent.

Modifying 100% can increase or decrease the value and understanding. For example:

200% (x2 of 100%) So when you say something is two times the amount, you say it's increased to 200% or had an increase of 100%. The grammar also matters to be understood.

If you said 0.00077 of the population has died from covid, without a reference to 1 being the whole, as you're doing which is unorthodox, it would still be misunderstood by the laymen to be a percentage rather than an incomplete decimal value.

So the correct term to represent the percentage is 0.077% not just 0.00077
0 ups, 3y
Nice dig up for that meme!
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Because I wasn't representing 100.00 as 100%. I repsented 1.00 as 1 population.

0.077 of 100 is the same as 0.00077 of 1.00

Again - same thing.
2 ups, 3y
This reminds me of this scene:
0 ups, 3y
The 1/20th is a typo in my meme title. It was supposed to say 1/10th. Which is true - the 20 is a typo.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
825k Americans dead and 5.44 MILLION dead worldwide... YUPTOTALYNOTDEADLY
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
99.923% of the population still alive and kicking. I look at the bright side
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
is this funny to you? is it funny that HEY WELL AT LEAST WERE NOT ALL DEAD LOL XD??? is it funny that almost 5 and a half million people are dead?
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Where did I lol there? I didn't. Why are you so upset about 99.923% being alive still? Is that not enough dead for you?
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
BrUh, i dont feel like listing to your bull shit right now. Good night :)
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
*listening to my BS ;-)
1 up, 3y
(f**king auto-correct XD)
Show More Comments
What Do We Want 3 memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 3
  • Dr. Fauci
  • Dr. Fauci
  • Dr. Fauci
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    WE ARE IN A PANDEMIC! YEAH! LOCK US DOWN! HOW BAD?!?! IT'S REALLY REALLY BAD!!! IT HAS KILLED 0.00077 % OF US!! WAIT... WHAT?