Media et al: Move along, nothing to see here (but a train wreck of consequences from a stolen election)...

Good one! Keep 'em coming!
Happy New Year!

Oh, what evidence would that be?

:0)

Many thanks for the jar, RYKAHNE!🙂

:0)

I gotta say vBackman, in this particular meme, you've given me an entirely different perspective on how widespread voter fraud looks! (especially from behind! 🤨😏🤨)

Glad you are paying attention while the lame-stream leftists are turning a blind eye to it all, Elvis....

Yep! While I think I almost always notice all your excellent memes, for some reason these two memes of yours particularly caught my eye. Not sure why though...

Probably 'cause you aren't a he, him, they, their, call me ma'am kinda guy! You are one of those Binary, Cisgender, Heterosexual, Hated by the Left regular guys. Your cross to bear, Elvis, lmao....

The only voter fraud evidence I've seen has been 1) individuals and 2) and in favor of Trump.

There is no wide spread voter fraud evidence.

If you have evidence, you should get it to Lt. Governor Dan Patrick of Texas. He's still offering reward money for this evidence.

He's only paid out once. $25,000. To a liberal who found conservative voter fraud.

Just a little FYI

Accusations and finger pointing are evidence now?

Well you libs did to Trump sooooooo

AND there it is... you voted a failed business celebrity into office because you were butthurt and wanted to return to the good 'ol days when you could segregate blacks and hate everyone who don't look or smell like you,... in a white dominated Govt!
You will always lose that battle because America... ain't White anymore!
Deal with it.

"wanted to return to the good 'ol days when you could segregate blacks and hate everyone who don't look or smell like you,... in a white dominated Govt!
You will always lose that battle because America... ain't White anymore!
Deal with it."

And yet you seem to think that I'M the one preoccupied with race...

Despite my never having brought race into the conversation...

And you completely dodging the question...

Typical leftist.

AND... you're right back at "Leftist", because I don't agree with you...
Thanks for making everything you just posted "irrelevant".
BTW... you didn't ask a question dummy.
LOL
Typical racist troll. You're just pissed you can't tell what race I am so just keep shitting the bed like a true right-wing insurrectionist.
TRump was the mistake... had you voted in another Bush, you could have gotten your way but you got greedy and FAILED!
lol... must suck to be you.

Please please stop! I'm laughing so hard I'm starting to choke...

Look, I’m no political genius, and I’m sure as heck not into politics. I really don’t care if they’re extreme leftists or googolplex rightists. But I have absolutely no idea why people are saying it was rigged. I’m not trying to be a one sided political believer, but where’s the good evidence? It’s at more of a thumbprint, when I’m looking for an eye witness. Absolutely no offense, but I’m just really curious.

For those of us who do not superficially accept what the left dishes out, it is clear as a bell that it was stolen from the evidence that has come out. We keep up with it. Democrats are dirty and manipulate the truth. We don't buy into it. It is what they do to achieve their Globalist goals.

If you merely Google 2020 election fraud, you get the Yahoo, BBC, CNBC and liberal outlets spouting their agenda as first responses. Liberals control the biased media, Facebook, Twitter and you need to question why they routinely take down opposing viewpoints & censor the TRUTH. When you realize this reality, you question rather than blatantly accept what is dished out. It is the same with the Covid jab...they put out false info to encourage the masses to go along with it.

Look for the TRUTH as we are dealing with people who hate America and the good men who support and make our country great, Veitnamchimp. You may be young but you should hopefully be able to see the damage that Biden and his mental midgets have done to our country in less than a year. I encourage you to educate yourself and be a deep thinker, use common sense instead of emotion & let your conscience be your guide as if you do, you'll become a conservative. imgflip.com/i/5wmp33

https://hereistheevidence.com/

https://evidence2020.wordpress.com/2020/11/24/compilation-evidence-of-election-fraud-against-trump-voters-primary-sources-partially-vetted/

"https://hereistheevidence.com/"

loololololol i bet this will be an inciteful, non-biased, definitely not beyond parody website.
this literally reminds me of that https://isitchristmas.com/ site, or the http://hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/

damn where was this site when the supreme court was looking into it?

I'm glad I don't do bad things to ever be in need of a jury of my peers (if that included you, syn) as I would definitely not get a fair shake.

"I'm glad I don't do bad things"

like drone strikes

Most is compiled and ordered here:
https://hereistheevidence.com/

Did any of that impress a court judge?

It didn't, did it?

The cases were thrown out for Standing (if you understand what that means). The merits of the cases were never reviewed.

I don't think YOU understand what it means. Out of 70 cases, maybe 5 of them had a standing issue. There was no legally admissible evidence, THAT was the issue in all 70 cases. There was no merit to discuss. That's what the judges wrote in their rulings.

Like I believe you read the rulings in 70 cases. I know not all were thrown out for Standing, but the vast majority were. So the evidence has not been vetted in a Court of Law. You like to make it sound as if it has. It's just another lie you like to carry on. You're just a hyper partisan. Facts and mature discussion escape you.

I actually did. And you should too. Because the judges were very clear on the fact that they were throwing the cases out for lack of legally admissible evidence.

I don't believe you. I don't believe you read 70 rulings. It doesn't even make sense. If judges are throwing a case out for lack of standing, the do not review the merits of the case. Standing means that the person or group who is bringing the case to court do not have standing to do so. That they are not an aggrieved party to the action. You pretend you don't understand this. If you don't have standing your evidence does not get reviewed. You're full of it, that you read 70 rulings.

Read the rulings. The judges said that the case HAS NO MERITS AT ALL.

I don ot have to believe the judges "by law". What are you thinking, that I can be arrested and brought up on charges if I refuse to believe a judges rulings? What an idiotic thing to say. What they say goes until an appellate court or the SCOTUS over rules them. This just lends to why your point of view is so impoverished.

And SCOTUS very publicly announced that they weren't interested in reviewing the case, deferring back to the judges who have already weighed in. You are stuck with their rulings. Which, if you read them, said that the case did not have merit.

Don't believe you. The only thing that doesn't have merit is anything you have to say.

Just read the rulings. You don't have to believe me but you DO, by law, have to believe the judges. What they say goes.

Don't worry. This will come back again once we can scrape the Democrats from power.

It won't. Several of those 70 judges weren't even Democrat appointees. Even if you took power for long enough to appoint enough judges that there were no Democratic judges anymore, you still have a bunch of judges you completely failed to convince! And it will go nowhere AGAIN!

This has nothing to do with who's in power, and everything to do with a lack of evidence on your part.

You read the rulings (no I don't believe you did). Most cases were dismissed for Standing.

It really isn't even close to being most.

But really, all you needed was for one judge to move you forward. Just one. It wasn't like they took a vote of judges and the majority sets the rulings - one judge would have brought the whole case forward. And you didn't convince any. And lack of evidence was the stated reason why in all the rulings.

It will. There's plenty of evidence. Your thoughts on the matter are worthless.

Post it.

70 judges said there isn't. And their thoughts on the matter is what counts.

So you say. Aside from your ramblings you present not a stitch of evidence. AND even if true, their legal opinions can be over turned. But you have no credibility.

Read the rulings. I've been telling you to for years.

This is too big for a single judge to solve. The awareness of society is necessary. The judges want to sleep peacefully.

You had 70 judges and you couldn't get passed the initial stages with ANY of them!

Justice advances slowly.

South Philly judge of elections admits he took bribes to stuff the ballot box for Democratic candidates.

I wonder how many more judges there are like him and we haven't caught them yet.

https://www.inquirer.com/news/voter-fraud-philadelphia-ward-leader-judge-of-elections-domenick-demuro-guilty-plea-20200521.html

No, it moved at lightning pace to give you a fair shake before the certification process and you couldn't get ONE SINGLE VOTE stricken down as fraudulent. Never mind the millions you'd need - you couldn't get ONE.

70 chances. Not one fraudulent vote proven.

If what you say is true, the more suspicious it is. How is it possible that not a single illegal vote has been proven, when there are always illegal votes.

https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/05/09/database-swells-to-1285-proven-cases-of-voter-fraud-in-america/

Because your evidence is garbage and everyone's been saying so from the beginning.

So no intelligent rebuttal... Figures.

I did not mean you, I mean anyone in general. The evidence is not mine, it is simply there, for anyone.

But it's not. The judges ruled that you had no evidence of the bare minimum legal standard. The evidence is NOT there. It wasn't there for the judges, and the judges are the important ones, therefore the evidence is not there for anyone.

Do not worry about it, I have not presented anything to any court, if it seems that everything is going in your favor, do not be so nervous.

Many people distrust the security of this electoral system. That has to change, and these judicial processes must serve to improve the system.

Then what are you talking to me for? The entire point of the court system is that's where these things are settled. I'm a layman. Present your evidence to a court or drop the whole thing: those are your only options. Gabbing on about it to strangers on the internet is a pure waste of time - I am not a federal judge.

It's not my evidence, it's just the evidence, I have not created it, it is simply there, and anyone can be interested in it

Well, I'm not. You know why? Because the judges said it wasn't enough to form the basis of a case.

And if a professionally trained judge said the evidence was garbage, why would I spend my own time on it?

Trump said it was rigged, even BEFORE the election.
And it's true as he tried to steal it by trying to persuade certain states to overturn their results, then with his lame coup de grasse.

Contesting AFTER someone's brother did what? is one thing, claiming months BEFORE is a whole other breed of doggie.

Who is "we"?
She is "she"

You should look into Georgia, who oversaw his own election there and threw out a couple of hundred thou registrations over dotted "i"s - and without notification.

You should also look to which of his duties have been altered and curtailed by the Georgia legislature this year in response to him not illegally throwing out votes and handing the the state over to Trump as per his demands.

Excellent example you brought up of the GOP altering rules to suit themselves - a double pronger, no less.

Nice attempt to twist the meaning of the meme...but fail again.