Stop The Insanity of Vaccine Tyranny....

5s078v.jpg (click to show) New government approved treatment

LOVE it, Dr.S....💛

I wore a mask at Target today. Three of my lungs collapsed as I got carbon monoxide poisoning from breathing in my own bacteria. A brave patriot wearing an Affliction shirt, a MAGA hat, and sweet wrap around sunglasses saved me by giving me CPR. I thanked him and asked if he was a doctor and he said "who needs doctors when we have our fellow Americans, the ones who are here legally I mean." I hugged him and threw my mask on the ground. The Star Spangled Banner played on the speaker system as everyone in the store ripped off their masks and threw them on the ground, chanting "down with communism!" God, Jesus, and all the angels looked down upon us from Heaven and clapped.

The survival rate depends on a number of factors, including your age. It's different for different groups. More importantly, the fact that the survival is high nationally does not mean that it won't kill *you,* or that the probability of you surviving it is the same as the national rate. A basic tenet of statistics is that the probability that an event will occur has nothing to do with whether or not it actually occurs.

But it is your life. Do you.

Have you listened to the Doctors, nurses and health care professionals who have given up their jobs rather than take the jab? They are the ones who know what is going on in the hospitals. What about those injured by the vaccine and with so many more dead than we ever would allow in the past?
SWINE FLU PROGRAM IS HALTED IN 9 STATES AS 3 DIE AFTER SHOTS
https://www.nytimes.com/1976/10/13/archives/swine-flu-prograrm-is-halted-in-9-states-as-3-die-after-shots.html

Watch videos of Dr. Mercola, Dr. Peter McCullough, Robert W Malone, MD and the Frontline Doctors
‘Vast majority of deceased are vaccinated people’; ‘Very significant discrepancy’ between vaccine efficacy studies done in Israel vs US, UK
(https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/frontlinenews/watch-vast-majority-of-deceased-are-vaccinated-people-very-significant-discrepancy-between-vaccine-efficacy-studies-done-in-israel-vs-us-uk/

You are a smart guy, deadbox, but you not up to snuff on this one. The Doctors have no ulterior motives in this unlike Dr. Fauci (caught in lies while under oath) and others supporting Big Pharma and not PEOPLE who are being effected now and potentially well into the future. The health of Americans should always more important than money.

So much out there if you take the time to delve into it. Sharyl Attkisson is a good lady as you know. Check her out... https://sharylattkisson.com/2021/10/exclusive-summary-covid-19-vaccine-concerns/

Thank you for the compliment and the link. I appreciate the former and found the latter to be informative. It seems that you and I are in agreement about most things.

I think the central matter here is individual rights and liberty versus government responsibility. I was vaxxed in January. At the time, it was an optional opportunity and the right decision for my situation. I do NOT expect others to base *their* decision on *my circumstances.* I do not regret my decision, but I am not certain I would make the same decision today. I understand that potential side effects are a possible consequence of that decision.

I also understand the position of governments and large organizations. If we accept the fatality rate of .8% based on your number above, that's still nearly 660,000 people. That's too large a number to walk away from, even if that percentage is accurate. The government has to take some action.

If a child or teen gets COVID and dies (no matter how unlikely we might regard this) because one of their classmates or a teacher spreads the virus, they open themselves up to massive liability. School vaccination mandates are over 100 years old.

That said I am not in favor of nationwide mandates.

If someone chooses not to get the vaccine, that is their right. At the same time, that decision will have consequences that could include the inability to continue their career in the same way or place or the inability send their children to public school. That sucks, but consequences often do.

I think the main thrust of my comment was aimed at the statistics. I am in no way supportive of a national vaccination mandate. Masks, maybe, as they are temporary and non-invasive. I am not a statistics expert, but I have had enough education and experience with statistics to know that it is very easy to both misrepresent data and misinterpret data presented statistically.

Everyone has to choose their own consequences, just as we have to vet our sources. Again it sucks, but that's the world today.

Yes, we agree on most things so I was surprised to see you had taken the jab, deadbox. There is another very smart conservative on here who also took the jab. I respect both of you and your right and freedom to make your own decisions; I do not respect liberty-destroying mandates complete with punishments such as job loss & punitive restrictions of other freedoms for Americans who choose 'not' to take the experimental jab. We are losing our rights on a daily basis and I cannot believe so many Americans are so accepting of it. America is not about imposed consequences for an experimental jab that may lead to potential long-term health issues. Period.

The media has censored so much information about this risky vaccine. I post only to educate other Americans who might not have done the research. It is heartbreaking for me to see the numbers of people impacted by this jab and to know that the numbers are most likely much higher than reported. We have a media that has an agenda. They control what we easily can access. If you delve in deeper, you will see the skewed statistics (yes, I hate statistics, too....truly my worst subject by far in college but I compensated by marrying a brilliant numbers man who keeps me straight). You will also see the lies as Doctors are testing their vaccinated patients and finding problems.

My own brother took the vaccine voluntarily and another family member was mandated to take it. I truly hope you will be ok and if you have children, PLEASE DO NOT CONSIDER giving them the jab as that would be one of the worst forms of child abuse, IMO. I don't think you know but I followed you about two years ago so we usually think quite similarly, deadbox. We don't think alike on vaccines but let's get back to our basic freedoms and hold the other side accountable for their tyranny against Americans (and most definitely conservatives & Trump supporters).

Can't speak for deadbox but I have spoken with nurses, doctors, and healthcare professionals I know personally and there is a pretty clear consensus. (Get vaxxed). I'm curious though... What exactly makes you believe the people quitting their jobs are the ones in the know? How do you know the opposite isn't true?

'Vast majority of deceased are vaccinated people’.. Without more context that doesn't necessarily mean anything. If 100% of a population is vaccinated, 100% of covid deaths will be among vaccinated people.

Lots of info on this stream that will possibly shed some light.. There are many many pages already assembled in the stream, so please scroll through all pages and read the topic titles, and then start somewhere on a deep dive..

https://imgflip.com/m/COVID_Truth

Eh... not impressed. The first meme I saw on there the other day when I looked at it involved something about the covid vaccine "shedding".... Based on what I've read so far vaccine shedding is scientifically impossible with mRNA vaccines.

Thanks for the invite bruh.

LOL

Science-denying nutcases.

Science-denying nutcases - " men can get pregnant"

Your argument there isn't science - its grammar. Nobody is claiming a male can get pregnant. But a biological female//male gender can. You are intentionally using gender in place of sex to score points. Sad.

Science is absolute on this and I don't care how you want to spin it or split hairs. Women get pregnant men do not. Simply by stating "men can get pregnant" (Healthline states that -Yes, it’s possible for men to become pregnant and give birth to children of their own.) is cringe worthy. This is a social justice statement that spits in the face of science. Science doesn't acknowledge feelings, its based in facts... i really don't understand how the left that claims to embrace science , completely disregard biology because of social implications.

Thanks for the facts mixed with common sense....both of which allude the "Progressives", King....

I love how these shit eating libtards keep saying "trust the science" and then hold people's feelings above the science they claim to believe in.

I'm a metrics guy. Suicide rate is something to look at. Some papers say that gender affirmation surgery helps, some say it doesn't. The one from the heritage foundation says suicide rates are higher than their peers after...but doesn't define peers - is peers the general population or other trans people? What is the comparison between people who wanted treatment and didn't get it and those who did get treatment?

How much of the suicide rate is due to latent mental issues, or caused by the way society treats trans people? Then there is the assault and sexual assault rate. Trans people are victims very often.

Its complicated, and I don't want to add to the stress of someone in a hard spot. Especially where it doesn't cost me much. Call you by your gender instead of sex? Sure, why not?

At the moment those hospitals doing gender affirmation surgeries or treatments require a psychologist recommendation (and often more than one) that this is the best option. At the moment, and barring something definitive in another direction, I think that is as good as it gets.

you know what? I agree with your last comment . personal preferences are fine, and I'll even abide by them. I won't go out of my way to offend someone if they ask me not to personally.. the only problem I have is when laws start changing to temper the outcry of the smallest fraction of the population and when facts are swept away to save people's feelings. whether the facts support or diminish my opinions- like Dave Chappelle said "everyone right now came into being through a females legs" that is a fact that no one should be angry about, women are the temples of creation, men will never be that. That fact is being attacked by the lgbtq community because it offends trans women, whom are biologically men.

I can't speak for others, but that wasn't what offended people about what Chappelle said. The jokes... Whatever. I think those were just par for the course.

What I thought was lame was his fake earnest moment at the end

His accusation that trans people are punching down in his people. So I guess there aren't any black trans people, or do they just not count? It also seems to assume that black people are being attacked for no reason. Pretty sure that isn't the case.

And any sincerity there may have been in that request was ruined by "I'm not going to tell trans jokes anymore"... At the end of a special where he made trans jokes? It wasn't live, including them was a choice.

Brain differences - there seems to be back and forth on that, but I don't have time to deconflict a bunch of studies... So, moving on...

You think I'm using a dirty leftist dictionary, so point me to the dictionary I should use. Surely there most be a non woke dictionary to reference.

Languages change. I'd advise fighting back with substance on why it shouldn't change to accommodate gender identity, because I'm thinking the mockery is going to backfire.

All reconstructive surgery could be called mutilation. Born with a club foot or cleft lip - surgery can help that to a degree by changing what toy were born with. Moving skin from one part is the body to another. They take toes and turn them into thumbs ffs.

How is it disrespectful to *normal* men and women?

Also putting someone's face back together after they kiss a windshield is the same to you as Mutilation? You better rethink your definitions - Oct Melody even agreed with me that the two things of reconstruction and genital alterations are completely different.

Your misunderstand. I'm saying mutilation is subjective. Some reconstructive surgery is about bringing the form to where it should be.

I don't consider any of those to be mutilation. Nor do I consider gender confirmation surgery to be mutilation. I don't want it, but I also don't want piercings or full body tattoos.

well I can't argue that some reconstructive surgeries fall into the mutilation realm, I am sure you seen that living Barbie Doll and Ken dude... that shit is freaky. I always fall back to the suicide rates though in the trans community , when I define the mental disorder that (imo) they are cursed with, no one else has a 40 % suicide rate, which does not reduce in anyway after genital reconfiguration. Instead of promoting those action - we should be trying to help them with meds , ssri meds, anti depressants and the such- I want to save their lives I don't want to see people committing suicide .

I don't think you are using a "dirty leftist dictionary" I think you are not doing any research that doesn't align with your views. Dressing up as someone you are not isn't disrespectful? I guess you are cool with black face too huh? lmfao

I personally am not offended by blackface, no. But I do understand why it is offensive to others.

Wearing blackface isn't pretending to be black. It is generally done in mockery.

I can't know someone elses experiences. Someone tells me in their heart of hearts they are transgender and are prepared to deal with ridicule that entails? I'm inclined to believe them. Why else would they endure? Why would they go through the psychological evaluations required to get surgery or hormone blockers approved? To go through surgeries?

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1357650X.2018.1497044 - its long as hell but it is informative and doesn't pander to any one side of the political spectrum. If you need to save time and a ton of reading scroll down to behavioral assessment and then scroll down to summary.

That was good...a lot, but good. I'm going to have to reread it.

yea I had to pause a few times to rest my eyes, it is a ton of info if you read it from top to bottom.

Sounds like you are the one who is emotional.

I'd be a lot more sympathetic to your issue with the fact that the gender v sex thing snuck up on you if I didn't have a sneaking suspicion that your real issue isn't with way gender identity is being described by doctors and researchers. Your issue is the fact that they and allies are pushing for equal treatment and reasonable concessions. It's that the people you think should be ashamed are being told they don't need to be.

See, IDC if different words had been used. If the way that trans men were described was "tomboy" or even some of the words now considered gauche, it doesn't change the underlying truth, whatever that truth might be.

I could point you to a study that found that many trans people have areas of their brain that developed in ways that more closely match their internal identity rather than their biological sex. One I read that showed sex specific sensory responses similarly often match gender instead of biology. I could probably find the article that talked about the fact that they don't try to fix people who are trans anymore because they found that it was ineffective and harmful. Or the study that theorized on causes - certain hormone fluctuations in the mother or other conditions leading to the brain developing that way.

Science develops new tools and sees the world better. The fact that some of what they see doesn't please you doesn't matter. Facts don't care about feelings.

Complete nonsense - Except for the simple difference in size, there are no meaningful differences between men’s and women’s brain structure or activity that hold up across diverse populations. Nor do any of the alleged brain differences actually explain the familiar but modest differences in personality and abilities between men and women. The only people using grammar incorrectly are the leftist trying to say "men can get pregnant" . Men can not get pregnant, trans men can ,yes - however that is because they are women pretending to be men. Saying "men " can get pregnant is scientifically false and in no way correct in any manner spoken. Trying to blur the lines between men and women and transmen and trans women is horrific, nonscientific, and most of all a complete disrespect to normal men and women. dressing up, getting operations to mutilate your genitals , and taking pills to halt sexual development does not a gender make.

A zombie concept
Still, “sexual dimorphism” won’t die. It’s a zombie concept, with the latest revival using artificial intelligence to predict whether a given brain scan comes from a man or woman.

Computers can do this with 80% to 90% accuracy except, once again, this accuracy falls to 60% (or not much better than a coin flip) when you properly control for head size. More troublesome is that these algorithms don’t translate across populations, such as European versus Chinese. Such inconsistency shows there are no universal features that discriminate male and female brains in humans – unlike deer antlers.

Neuroscientists have long held out hope that bigger studies and better methods would finally uncover the “real” or species-wide sex differences in the brain. But the truth is, as studies have gotten bigger, the sex effects have gotten smaller.

I'll buy that. I thought the idea was neat, but it isn't necessary and doesn't change where I stand.

fair enough.

Nobody says that, unless they mean intersex or trans.

It isn't science, it's business.

You tell yourself that.

Science isn't magic and it isn't magically science because you say it is. Kinda like how you people believe that your sex can be changed daily and the sane people have to listen to you idiots claim it's science.

*gender fluid has entered the chat

Science is still science whether or not you believe it.

LoL

What are you talking about? And how about climate, viruses, vaccines and the age of the earth?

trust me I have plenty of disagreements with my conservative brothers and sisters, I am consistently trying to explain how vaccines benefit society , as for the age of the earth , that is an issue with the evangelicals with that f**king creationist bullshit.. ugh. Climate change is a natural phenomenon - currently the earth is at the end of an ice age, the earth is warming naturally, and unnaturally from a bit of pressure from countries like China and India that creates 80% of the total waste in the ocean. claiming humans are the entire cause of global warming is as bad as claiming the earth is flat.

That isn't mutually exclusive.

I've assembled a vast amount of information into a stream that you might wish to review. I update it with new content regularly. The content isn't a joke, nor "fake" in any form or fashion.

Here's the main landing page: https://imgflip.com/m/COVID_Truth

Here's the first item posted on the stream, and I think vBackman might have mentioned something similar to you:

https://imgflip.com/i/5o2a6k

direct link to the video:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jXfmhulYzIAs/

WRONG

You mean "a lie". The vax isn't experimental, and you just made up the survival rate.

Experimental is a matter of opinion. It normally takes way longer to "approve" any medicine or vax, so many consider the approval sus.
As for the survival rate, just look up the fatality rate (.02% to .03% depending on your reliable source, many unreliable ones omitted the decimal) and subtract it from 100%.

Still fake (understated) death rate not from an official source. And the vaccine's been tested and approved, so...

https://www.webmd.com/lung/covid-recovery-overview#1 CDC posted that covid 19 has a 97 -99.75% survival rate.

So you're still exaggerating the survival rate.

I gave you the CDC numbers, you stupid cane toad.

While it is true that it takes longer to approve a vaccine, it is also true that the developers had a headstart on the vaccine because the mRNA technology has been under development since the SARS virus back in 2004. So it is not completely accurate (or honest imo) to claim that this was the fastest vaccine in history.