You're right, the odds of getting the virus are far less in some parts of the country than others. Yet for some reason, the pro-Fauci, pro-double-mask wearing crowd seems (or seemed... I haven't paid any serious attention to them in a long time) to think we need a federal mask mandate, or some kind of federal standards to deal with the virus.
I can still hear the echoes of the agitated progressives' chants for Trump to impose a mask mandate on the entire country. And as usual he was skewered by the low-brow clearly biased Trump-hating media, libtards of all stripes, and of course Big Tech (which tells most libtards what they know) for not doing so.
Fast forward to a meme like yours, and I find it humorous that someone who clearly hates all things Trump, essentially makes Trump's point for him.
I suppose it's just another example of forming one's opinions based on political expediency, as opposed to basing them on a solid philosophical foundation (like being against govt over-reach, as an example.)
Now, off on a tangent... along with your comment, a quick scan of your memes indicates that you can't make a point FOR something without using hatred for Christians, and/or Republicans, and/or Trump, as some sort of failed mechanism to draw a contrast. I think there are two problems with that. First and most obvious is that a point should be able to stand on its own, don't you think? The second is that that approach sure seems like an obsessive attitude of hatred, which if I'm not mistaken is something you accuse those you disagree with of having, right?
And fwiw, I'm not a Christian, nor a Republican. I just think if a point can't be made without attacking something/someone else, it's probably a pretty weak point.